TOR

2025-26 Season

JAMISON BATTLE

Toronto Raptors | Forward | 6-7
Jamison Battle
3.3PPG
1.5RPG
0.4APG
8.8MPG
-7.4 Impact

Battle produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-7.4
Scoring +3.5
Points Scored 3.3 PPG = +3.3
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.9
Creation +0.1
Assists & Self-Creation 0.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.1
Turnovers -0.7
Turnovers 0.3/g (live + dead blend) = -0.7
Defense -0.4
Steals 0.1/g = +0.2
Blocks 0.0/g = +0.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -0.6
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Rebounds 1.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.6
Contested Shots 0.8/g = +0.2
Deflections 0.3/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +3.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.0
Net Impact
-7.4
3th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 9th
4.3 PPG
Efficiency 93th
64.7% TS
Playmaking 2th
0.5 APG
Rebounding 5th
1.9 RPG
Defense 6th
+2.9/g
Hustle 15th
+7.6/g
Creation 2th
+0.75/g
Shot Making 52th
+5.95/g
TO Discipline 84th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jamison Battle’s first 21 games were defined by extreme, boom-or-bust shooting variance from the deep bench. When his jumper was falling, he looked like a lethal weapon. On 10/31 vs CLE, he caught absolute fire, draining all six of his three-point attempts for 20 points in just 15 minutes. That flawless perimeter execution and immediate offensive gravity earned him a stellar +11.2 Impact score, completely masking his lack of playmaking and rebounding. However, when the shots stopped dropping, his on-court value plummeted. Look no further than 12/19 vs MIL, where a scoreless five-minute stint yielded a disastrous -17.4 Impact score. Because he provides almost zero secondary skills—mustering just two rebounds and one assist in that outing—empty shooting nights turn him into a glaring liability. He rescued his numbers slightly on 12/24 vs MIA with a perfect 3-for-3 mark from deep and a +5.9 Impact score, but the reality remains clear: Battle is a one-trick pony who either shoots the lights out or actively hurts his team.

Jamison Battle spent the middle of the season clinging to the fringes of the rotation, bleeding value during brief, chaotic cameos. The tone was set early on 12/27 vs WAS. He clanked all three of his shots and grabbed zero rebounds in ten minutes that night to post a brutal -15.5 Impact score. Even when handed a rare spot start on 01/15 vs IND, he managed just five points and one assist in 20 minutes. That invisible offensive output crippled the starting unit, resulting in a dismal -11.1 Impact. He finally stopped the bleeding on 02/22 vs MIL, logging five points and three rebounds in just nine minutes. That perfect 2-for-2 shooting night, combined with his active work on the glass, yielded a neutral -0.0 Impact score. It was a rare bright spot for a deep bench forward who usually sinks lineups through empty possessions.

Jamison Battle spent this late-season stretch firmly entrenched in garbage-time purgatory, struggling to generate any positive momentum off the bench. His absolute floor arrived on 03/13 vs PHX, where he logged nine minutes of pure cardio while posting a disastrous -17.7 Impact score. When a rotation player registers just one missed shot, a single rebound, and one assist in nearly a quarter of action, that severe negative impact reflects a complete lack of defensive engagement and off-ball utility. Even when his jump shot finally caught fire, the underlying metrics refused to bite. During a season-high 23 minutes on 03/23 vs UTA, Battle poured in 17 points on sharp 4-for-7 perimeter shooting, yet still finished with a -1.3 Impact. Those buckets were ultimately empty calories, dragged into the red by defensive lapses and an inability to string together stops when the opposing second unit attacked him. He saw extended run again on 03/18 vs CHI, but a clunky 6-point night on 2-for-6 shooting yielded a -6.1 Impact, highlighting exactly why his playing time evaporated to mere seconds by April.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Battle has posted negative impact in 93% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 70% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 41 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 71 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. McConnell 20.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
R. Dillingham 15.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
A. Simons 14.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Sheppard 13.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Filipowski 13.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Porter Jr. 13.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
W. Riley 12.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Nembhard 12.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Champagnie 12.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 3
Q. Grimes 12.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

W. Riley 17.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 6
R. Dillingham 16.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 4
B. Sheppard 16.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Q. Grimes 16.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
T. Salaün 14.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Nesmith 14.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
P. Williams 13.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3
K. Filipowski 13.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Champagnie 12.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 5
E. Harkless 12.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

67
Games
3.3
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.4
APG
0.1
SPG
0.0
BPG
51.8
FG%
43.8
3P%
64.3
FT%
8.8
MPG

GAME LOG

67 games played