TOR

2025-26 Season

COLLIN MURRAY-BOYLES

Toronto Raptors | Forward | 6-7
Collin Murray-Boyles
8.4 PPG
4.9 RPG
1.8 APG
22.0 MPG
+3.5 Impact

Murray-Boyles produces at an above average rate for a 22-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+3.5
Scoring +5.6
Points 8.4 PPG × +1.00 = +8.4
Missed 2PT 2.0/g × -0.78 = -1.6
Missed 3PT 0.6/g × -0.87 = -0.5
Missed FT 0.7/g × -1.00 = -0.7
Creation +2.4
Assists 1.8/g × +0.50 = +0.9
Off. Rebounds 1.2/g × +1.26 = +1.5
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 1.1/g × -1.95 = -2.1
Defense +2.1
Steals 0.9/g × +2.30 = +2.1
Blocks 0.9/g × +0.90 = +0.8
Def. Rebounds 3.7/g × +0.30 = +1.1
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.6
Contested Shots 5.3/g × +0.20 = +1.1
Deflections 2.7/g × +0.65 = +1.8
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +11.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.1
Net Impact
+3.5
85th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 46th
8.4 PPG
Efficiency 80th
61.1% TS
Playmaking 57th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 61th
4.9 RPG
Rim Protection 77th
0.18/min
Hustle 92th
0.15/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 43th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Collin Murray-Boyles's first twenty games were a wildly erratic rollercoaster defined by the stark contrast between his defensive ceiling and his offensive indiscipline. When he embraced his physical tools, he was an absolute revelation. Look no further than 11/02 vs MEM, where he posted 15 points and 9 rebounds alongside a staggering +15.8 impact score by using textbook verticality and switchability to completely neutralize the interior. He could even tilt the floor without scoring. On 11/29 vs CHA, he managed a +3.1 impact with just a single point by entirely abandoning his scoring role to anchor the defense and make crucial hustle plays. Yet, when he drifted away from the basket, the results were disastrous. During a brief stint on 11/26 vs IND, he generated a brutal -6.0 impact in merely 8 minutes because he settled for forced, out-of-rhythm perimeter shots that killed the offense. He is a tantalizing talent, but he must realize his true value lies in bruising screens and rim deterrence rather than contested jumpers.

Moving from a bench piece to a full-time starter transformed Collin Murray-Boyles into an indispensable two-way anchor. Look no further than his brilliant performance on 01/07 vs CHA, where he scored just four points but generated a massive +14.1 impact score. He controlled the game entirely through non-scoring value, dominating the glass with 15 rebounds and executing elite defensive rotations. When he actively hunted his own offense, the results were devastating. On 01/05 vs ATL, he poured in 17 points and dished 7 assists, earning a staggering +19.2 impact score by putting on an absolute clinic in rim-running and finishing through contact. Yet, there were still nights where hidden costs ruined his effectiveness. During the 01/16 vs LAC matchup, he managed a respectable 11 points but posted a -3.4 impact score because he rushed his reads in traffic and forced ugly attempts.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Murray-Boyles has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~5 points between games.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 79% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Murray-Boyles consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +1.6, second-half: +5.3. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 53 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Johnson 66.2 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
K. Towns 58.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
J. Embiid 50.8 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 10
G. Yabusele 48.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
W. Carter Jr. 47.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
V. Wembanyama 44.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
A. Drummond 41.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
I. Zubac 39.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
A. Bona 39.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
J. Huff 37.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Johnson 46.7 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 13
A. Drummond 46.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
G. Yabusele 45.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
J. Embiid 44.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.33
PTS 15
O. Okongwu 44.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 14
V. Wembanyama 44.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
W. Carter Jr. 42.4 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11
K. Towns 42.4 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
I. Zubac 42.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
A. Bona 41.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

53
Games
8.4
PPG
4.9
RPG
1.8
APG
0.9
SPG
0.9
BPG
57.2
FG%
34.0
3P%
64.6
FT%
22.0
MPG

GAME LOG

53 games played