MIL

2025-26 Season

ANDRE JACKSON JR.

Milwaukee Bucks | Guard | 6-6
Andre Jackson Jr.
2.2 PPG
1.3 RPG
0.9 APG
7.8 MPG
-1.7 Impact

Jr. produces at an below average rate for a 8-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.7
Scoring +0.8
Points 2.2 PPG × +1.00 = +2.2
Missed 2PT 0.7/g × -0.78 = -0.5
Missed 3PT 0.9/g × -0.87 = -0.8
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +0.9
Assists 0.9/g × +0.50 = +0.5
Off. Rebounds 0.3/g × +1.26 = +0.4
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense -0.7
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.0/g × +0.90 = +0.0
Def. Rebounds 1.0/g × +0.30 = +0.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +0.7
Contested Shots 0.7/g × +0.20 = +0.1
Deflections 0.6/g × +0.65 = +0.4
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +0.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −2.2
Net Impact
-1.7
45th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 236 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 3th
3.7 PPG
Efficiency 8th
44.1% TS
Playmaking 20th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 22th
2.1 RPG
Rim Protection 49th
0.11/min
Hustle 32th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 24th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Andre Jackson Jr.'s first twenty games of the 2025-26 campaign were defined by erratic decision-making and offensive dead weight. Even when handed an extended 29-minute run on 11/22 vs DET, his passive offense and poor shooting dragged the unit down to a staggering -7.9 impact despite logging season-highs of 6 points, 4 rebounds, and 5 assists. He passed up open looks and crippled his team's spacing, turning what should have been a productive night into a severe net negative. The offensive frustration peaked on 02/01 vs BOS. In just eight minutes, he bricked a flurry of attempts to finish 0-for-5 from the field, yielding a brutal -4.1 impact by completely killing the offensive flow. Yet, a genuinely useful player exists beneath the chaos if he accepts his limitations. During a 12-minute shift on 12/06 vs DET, Jackson generated a stellar +4.3 impact with just 4 points. By operating purely as a low-usage connector, he made quick, decisive reads that kept the offense humming instead of forcing the issue.

A chaotic blend of out-of-control drives and erratic shot selection defined this deeply frustrating slump for Andre Jackson Jr. Even when he finally found the bottom of the net on 03/29 vs LAC, his 13 points were entirely eclipsed by a disastrous -9.3 impact score. Why the massive negative? Costly live-ball turnovers and disjointed offensive reads actively harmed his team. He was similarly destructive on 12/14 vs BKN, posting a -6.6 impact score purely due to errant perimeter chucking. Yet, amidst the offensive wreckage, he occasionally generated value without scoring. During his 03/25 vs POR appearance, Jackson managed a +1.5 impact score despite tallying just 8 points because of smothering point-of-attack defense and relentless loose-ball recoveries. Unfortunately, those brief flashes of grit were too often buried under an avalanche of bad decisions.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Jr. has posted negative impact in 75% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 10% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Jr. doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -1.8, second-half -1.7. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Collins 18.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
C. Cunningham 16.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3
D. Jones Jr. 14.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. LeVert 12.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Miller 11.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 2
D. Robinson 10.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Lopez 9.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Buzelis 9.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Bryant 9.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 3
N. Queta 9.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. Cunningham 19.1 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 9
C. Bryant 14.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
J. Collins 11.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 4
D. Garland 11.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Jones Jr. 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Mathurin 8.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 1.24
PTS 11
K. Sanders 8.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 2
K. Dunn 8.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Buzelis 8.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 3
J. Miller 8.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

44
Games
2.2
PPG
1.3
RPG
0.9
APG
0.4
SPG
0.0
BPG
33.3
FG%
28.3
3P%
70.0
FT%
7.8
MPG

GAME LOG

44 games played