2025-26 Season
SION JAMES
2025-26 Season
SION JAMES
James produces at an poor rate for a 22-minute workload.
James produces at an poor rate for a 22-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 17 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Sion James's first 28 games were defined by the harsh reality of overexposure, as a scorching start in a limited bench role quickly devolved into a brutal slump when he was thrust into the starting lineup. Early on, he looked like a genuine sparkplug. His 10/26 vs WAS performance highlighted this early magic, as he poured in 13 points on sharp 3-for-4 perimeter shooting to generate a stellar +9.7 Impact score. But the promotion to the starting five shattered his rhythm and exposed his offensive limitations. During an 11/08 vs MIA start, he hit double digits with 10 points but still posted a disastrous -12.4 Impact score, as his forced 1-for-5 shooting from deep and empty defensive rotations dragged the unit down. He occasionally found ways to salvage his floor time through sheer grit, like his grueling 42-minute shift on 11/15 vs MIL. Despite scoring just 12 points on ten shots and missing five threes in that contest, his relentless work on the glass for seven rebounds earned him a season-high +12.7 Impact score. Ultimately, James is a high-energy rotation piece who creates value through hustle, but asking him to shoulder a starter's burden only hurts his overall effectiveness.
Sion James spent the middle of the 2025-26 season mired in a brutal offensive slump that often rendered him a liability on the floor. There was a fleeting moment of hope on 12/24 vs WAS, where he tallied 13 points and generated a +9.9 Impact rating by attacking the defense and keeping the ball moving. That aggression vanished almost immediately. Thrust into the starting lineup on 12/30 vs MIL, he played 29 empty minutes and posted a dismal -11.5 Impact, dragging the offense down by missing all three of his field goal attempts. He occasionally found ways to survive through sheer grit when his jumper completely abandoned him. On 01/11 vs UTA, James managed a +1.9 Impact despite scoring just four points because he relentlessly crashed the glass for seven rebounds and set up teammates with five assists. Conversely, even when he managed a higher scoring output on 01/16 vs LAL with nine points and eight boards, he still posted a -3.6 Impact. That negative mark reveals the hidden cost of poor efficiency, as he forced bad looks, bricked six of his ten shot attempts, and stalled the team's overall rhythm.
This stretch was defined by a brutal offensive slump that quickly banished Sion James to the bench. He actually opened the period as a starter on 02/20 vs CLE, generating a +7.6 impact score despite scoring just 5 points because he crashed the glass for 6 rebounds and kept the offense humming with 7 assists. The playmaking completely vanished after that. Look at his disastrous outing on 02/22 vs WAS, where he went scoreless on 0-for-3 shooting and posted a staggering -15.2 impact score due to a total lack of offensive creation. Even when his shot occasionally fell, hidden costs dragged down his overall value, like on 03/10 vs POR where he tallied 11 points and 7 rebounds but still managed a -0.7 impact score because he handed out just one assist and stalled the second-unit ball movement. He spent the rest of the spring forcing bad shots and struggling to justify his rotation minutes.
This late-season stretch was defined by extreme volatility, with Sion James oscillating wildly between game-wrecking defensive energy and total offensive invisibility. He engineered a brilliant rotation shift on Mar 19 vs ORL, posting a massive +16.5 impact score despite scoring just six points because his off-the-charts hustle (+7.3) and flawless shooting execution completely tilted the floor. Even when his perimeter stroke was dialed in, hidden costs occasionally dragged him down. During the Mar 29 vs BOS matchup, he scored 11 points but still recorded a slightly negative -0.2 impact because a glaring lack of secondary effort plays neutralized his offensive production. Yet, James could still salvage his minutes through sheer defensive grit when his jumper completely abandoned him. On Apr 07 vs BOS, he managed a +2.0 impact score despite scoring just two points on 1-for-7 shooting because he provided absolute clamps at the point of attack, generating a +10.2 defensive rating by blowing up dribble hand-offs. He remains a chaotic bench piece who can swing a game with his willpower just as easily as he can derail it with passivity.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. James has posted negative impact in 81% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 28% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games James locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
Small downward trend. First-half impact: -4.8, second-half: -6.8. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.
In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 17 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
84 games played