Toronto Raptors

Eastern Conference

Toronto
Raptors

HC Darko Rajakovic

49-40
L1

ROSTER — IMPACT RANKINGS

Scottie Barnes
Forward-Guard Yr 4 87G (87S)
+12.1
18.6 pts
7.4 reb
6.1 ast
33.9 min

This late-season stretch was defined by Scottie Barnes fully embracing the role of primary offensive hub, yielding wildly volatile results. When fully engaged, he was an absolute maestro. Look no further than Mar 29 vs ORL, where he racked up 23 points and 15 assists to post a staggering +26.7 impact score by picking apart the defense with surgical precision. Even when his jumper abandoned him, as it did on Mar 11 vs NOP, he still salvaged a +3.1 impact despite scoring just 9 points because his relentless effort provided massive non-scoring value, generating a +22.7 defensive score. Yet, that two-way focus frequently vanished. During Mar 08 vs DAL, he tallied 17 points, but hidden costs dragged him down to a dismal -6.3 overall impact when a porous -6.1 defensive rating completely erased his offensive contributions. Barnes clearly has the vision to run a modern offense, but his tendency to oscillate between dominant orchestration and passive execution remains maddening.

Immanuel Quickley
Guard Yr 5 70G (70S)
+9.6
16.4 pts
4.0 reb
5.9 ast
31.9 min

This mid-season stretch was defined by erratic shooting that forced Immanuel Quickley to evolve from a pure scorer into a gritty, high-volume facilitator. He reached his absolute offensive ceiling on 02/22 vs MIL, erupting for 32 points and nine assists on blistering 11-for-19 shooting to generate a massive +30.6 impact score. That dominant rating stemmed directly from his lethal perimeter shot-making and his ability to cleanly dissect the defense as a lead ball-handler. When his jumper abandoned him, he simply found alternative ways to keep his team afloat. Despite a miserable 4-for-14 shooting night on 03/03 vs NYK, Quickley still scraped out a +2.5 impact score by pivoting to a traditional point guard role and dishing out 12 assists to generate non-scoring value. Occasionally, the offensive futility was too heavy to mask with passing. His absolute floor arrived on 03/15 vs DET, where a disastrous 1-for-12 shooting performance and forced, contested attempts dragged him down to a -3.3 impact score.

Brandon Ingram
Forward Yr 9 82G (82S)
+9.6
20.9 pts
5.4 reb
3.6 ast
33.6 min

This late-season stretch was defined by a maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between unstoppable offensive brilliance and complete disappearing acts. When his jumper abandoned him during the 03/22 vs PHX matchup, Ingram looked entirely disengaged. He forced contested looks to finish with just six points, yielding a brutal -16.5 Impact score because his poor shot selection and lazy defensive rotations actively bled points. Yet, he could effortlessly flip a switch and dominate. He torched the defense on 04/09 vs MIA for 38 points, seven rebounds, and seven assists, generating a massive +39.6 Impact score by pairing his elite shot-making with sharp passing and relentless hustle. He even found ways to salvage rough shooting nights through sheer grit, notably during the 03/28 vs NOP contest. Despite managing only 13 points on 5-of-13 shooting, he scratched out a +5.1 Impact score by locking down on the perimeter and fighting for extra possessions. To be a reliable primary option, Ingram must bring that gritty secondary effort every night rather than letting his engagement fluctuate with his shooting percentage.

RJ Barrett
Forward-Guard Yr 6 64G (64S)
+8.4
19.8 pts
5.5 reb
3.4 ast
31.2 min

This late-season stretch was defined by RJ Barrett's maddening duality as a high-volume wing. He vacillated wildly between hyper-efficient rim pressure and momentum-killing tunnel vision. When his jumper abandoned him on 03/25 vs LAC, he stubbornly forced up a 5-for-19 shooting dud, missing all seven of his three-pointers to drag his impact down to a dismal -4.0. That same erratic shot selection plagued him during the 04/01 vs SAC matchup. He tallied 20 points that night, but posted an ugly -8.0 Impact score because his scoring came at the steep cost of inefficient volume and forced looks. Yet, Barrett remains a genuine game-changer when he channels his aggression into the dirty work. Look no further than the 04/09 vs MIA contest, where he shot a mediocre 6-for-15 from the floor but still registered a massive +22.4 Impact by making timely hustle plays and suffocating his matchups with pure defensive effort.

Jakob Poeltl
Center Yr 9 53G (51S)
+4.2
10.2 pts
6.9 reb
1.9 ast
24.2 min

Jakob Poeltl’s late-season stretch was a Jekyll-and-Hyde act of interior dominance followed by baffling passivity. When fully engaged, he was a battering ram in the paint. Just look at 03/20 vs DEN, where he bullied his way to 23 points and 11 rebounds on 10-of-14 shooting. That generated a massive +22.8 Impact score, driven by relentless rim finishing and sheer rebounding effort. Even when his scoring dipped, like his 8-point outing on 04/03 vs MEM, he still posted a +3.5 Impact by keeping the offense flowing with 4 assists and fighting for 7 boards. However, empty calories plagued his performance just two days later on 04/05 vs BOS. Despite scoring a highly efficient 14 points on 7-of-9 shooting, he registered a -2.7 Impact because he grabbed a pathetic two rebounds, completely failing to secure the defensive glass or anchor the middle. When he plays with force, he is a highly effective traditional big, but when he floats, his on-court value evaporates.

Sandro Mamukelashvili
Forward-Center Yr 4 87G (13S)
+3.4
10.7 pts
4.9 reb
1.8 ast
21.3 min

Sandro Mamukelashvili morphed into a highly disruptive, floor-stretching weapon during this late-season stretch. He consistently turned high-energy bench minutes into massive positive swings. He briefly lost his rhythm early on, posting a brutal -11.1 impact on Mar 11 vs NOP because he exclusively hunted three-pointers and abandoned his offensive versatility. He quickly recalibrated. Exploding in a spot start on Mar 23 vs UTA, the big man dropped 23 points to generate a staggering +21.0 impact score. Relentless activity on the margins and elite hustle metrics (+8.1) amplified his scoring that night. Even when his jumper vanished, he found ways to contribute. During an ugly five-point showing on Apr 09 vs MIA, elite defensive positioning (+5.0) and high-energy hustle plays (+2.3) kept his overall impact positive (+1.1) despite a severe drop in shooting efficiency.

Collin Murray-Boyles
Forward Yr 0 64G (22S)
+2.0
9.1 pts
5.2 reb
1.9 ast
22.4 min

A mid-season demotion to the second unit defined this stretch for Collin Murray-Boyles, paradoxically unlocking his most efficient basketball. Take his gritty performance on 04/07 vs MIA. He scored a meager 6 points, but his relentless work on the glass yielded 8 rebounds and drove an Impact: +5.9 score by simply keeping possessions alive. Two days later on 04/09 vs MIA, he erupted as a bench sparkplug, dropping 17 points on flawless 7-for-7 shooting to generate a staggering Impact: +20.7. Contrast that peak with his final days as a starter, like the disastrous outing on 02/08 vs IND. He was a total ghost during his eight minutes on the floor, failing to record a single rebound or assist to earn a dismal Impact: -10.3. When he stops forcing the issue and embraces the dirty work, he transforms into a terrifyingly effective rotation big.

Ja'Kobe Walter
Guard Yr 1 79G (24S)
-1.5
7.8 pts
2.6 reb
1.2 ast
21.5 min

Ja'Kobe Walter's late-season run was defined by a drastic role elevation, transforming from a lost bench piece into a lethal spot-starter. Early on, he looked completely unplayable, posting a brutal -10.5 Impact score on 03/03 vs NYK while failing to score a single point. Everything clicked when he earned a starting nod on 03/23 vs UTA, erupting for 21 points on blistering 6-of-8 shooting from deep to generate a massive +13.6 Impact score. His sudden ability to stretch the floor with decisive, high-efficiency shot selection completely opened up the offense. Even when his jumper abandoned him, he learned how to win his minutes, logging a +7.3 Impact score on 04/03 vs MEM despite scoring just seven points on 2-of-9 shooting. He salvaged that rough offensive night by crashing the glass for eight rebounds and making the gritty hustle plays that keep a rotation afloat. Walter finally stopped forcing the action and simply started playing winning basketball.

Jamal Shead
Guard Yr 1 89G (16S)
-4.9
6.8 pts
1.8 reb
5.4 ast
23.3 min

This stretch of the season was an offensive wasteland defined by severe passivity and erratic finishing, dragging down Shead's overall value despite occasional flashes of elite playmaking. His struggles peaked on Mar 05 vs MIN, where he posted a disastrous -17.2 impact score due to errant finishing at the rim and a brutal string of live-ball turnovers. Even when he piled up raw counting stats, his absolute refusal to look at the basket carried heavy hidden costs. During a start on Mar 23 vs UTA, Shead dished out 14 assists but still registered a -13.1 impact score because his severe lack of scoring gravity allowed defenders to sag off and clog passing lanes. He finally flipped the script on Mar 29 vs ORL. Earning another start, he generated a massive +21.6 impact score by pairing 12 points and 10 assists with suffocating point-of-attack defense that completely rattled the opposition. Unfortunately, that brilliant two-way performance was the exception rather than the rule, as his overall inability to space the floor routinely handicapped the second unit.

Trayce Jackson-Davis
Forward Yr 2 19G
-5.1
1.7 pts
1.7 reb
0.4 ast
4.7 min

This stretch of the season was defined by Trayce Jackson-Davis vanishing into the darkest corners of the bench. He actually started this block with a massive surge on 02/08 vs IND, racking up 10 points and 10 rebounds in just 16 minutes to generate a stellar +15.2 Impact score. That brief flash of dominant rebounding and efficient interior finishing quickly faded into a string of erratic garbage-time appearances. By the time he hit the floor on 03/11 vs NOP, he posted a brutal -9.5 Impact score in a measly three minutes because he forced three terrible, rushed shots (0-for-3 FG) instead of letting the offense flow. Things hit rock bottom on 03/23 vs UTA. Jackson-Davis logged seven minutes of pure cardio, grabbing a single rebound while putting up zeros across the rest of the box score to earn a staggering -17.4 Impact score. When a big man stops crashing the glass and starts rushing contested looks in limited minutes, his on-court value evaporates entirely.

Alijah Martin
Guard Yr 0 23G
-5.4
2.2 pts
0.9 reb
0.5 ast
6.3 min

Alijah Martin spent this seven-game stretch clinging to the absolute fringes of the rotation, struggling to find any rhythm in sporadic bursts of playing time. His only real spark arrived on 03/29 vs ORL, where he logged 13 minutes and tallied 8 points alongside 4 rebounds. That brief flash of aggressive shot creation and glass-crashing earned him a +6.5 impact score, an extreme outlier in an otherwise bleak run. The rest of the stretch was an offensive wasteland, bottoming out completely on 04/10 vs NYK. Despite getting an extended 12-minute look against New York, Martin forced terrible shots to go 1-for-5 from the field, resulting in a disastrous -14.6 impact score. Even in shorter stints, like his four empty minutes on 04/01 vs SAC, his total inability to connect on attempts or generate meaningful floor spacing dragged his impact down to -12.2. When an end-of-bench guard fails to score in five out of seven appearances, the underlying metrics will ruthlessly punish their lack of offensive utility.

A.J. Lawson
Guard Yr 3 31G
-5.4
3.6 pts
1.5 reb
0.4 ast
8.9 min

This late-season stretch was defined by erratic minutes and a desperate struggle to stay on the floor. On 04/12 vs BKN, Lawson managed a stretch-high 10 points on crisp 4-for-6 shooting, yet still posted a -0.3 Impact score. Why the negative mark? He offered absolutely zero peripheral production, grabbing no rebounds or assists while bleeding value through poor defensive rotations. Conversely, his longest run came on 04/10 vs NYK. He shot a miserable 1-for-5 from the field over 22 minutes of action. Despite the broken jumper, he actually salvaged a +3.2 Impact score by crashing the glass for six rebounds and injecting much-needed hustle. Unfortunately, he immediately reverted to empty minutes on 04/18 vs CLE, forcing bad shots to finish with a brutal -11.7 Impact score.

Gradey Dick
Guard-Forward Yr 2 79G (1S)
-5.7
5.8 pts
1.9 reb
0.6 ast
13.6 min

This stretch of the season was defined by a brutal crisis of confidence, as Gradey Dick bounced erratically between empty rotation minutes and the absolute end of the bench. Even when given a massive leash on 03/23 vs UTA, his 13 points and six assists masked a negative -0.6 Impact score. He bricked four of his five attempts from beyond the arc that night, eating up possessions with hollow volume rather than efficient execution. Conversely, his rare bright spots came when he stopped forcing the issue, like his quiet outing on 02/08 vs IND. He managed only eight points in 16 minutes, yet posted a +2.4 Impact by taking smarter shots and bringing enough defensive energy to survive his shift. Sadly, those moments of poise were buried under disastrous cameos where he simply chucked the basketball. Look no further than 03/25 vs LAC, where he hoisted four wild attempts in just four scoreless minutes to earn a catastrophic -13.7 Impact. He is pressing far too hard, turning brief opportunities into glaring liabilities.

Jonathan Mogbo
Forward Yr 1 43G
-6.8
1.5 pts
1.6 reb
0.6 ast
5.9 min

Jonathan Mogbo spent this late-season stretch marooned in deep-bench obscurity, logging brief, actively harmful minutes. The lone bright spot arrived on 03/22 vs PHX, where he earned 17 minutes and posted a +7.6 impact score by hitting three of his five shots and injecting some rare two-way hustle. But giving him a longer leash usually ended in disaster. Take his outing on 04/10 vs NYK, where he matched that 17-minute workload and tallied six points alongside five rebounds. Despite the decent box score, he registered a dismal -7.8 impact score because his floor time was completely hollow and his defensive awareness vanished. The absolute floor hit on 04/09 vs MIA. In just three minutes of action, Mogbo managed to rack up a staggering -11.0 impact score, offering zero points, rebounds, or assists while the opposition scored at will. When a fringe rotation guy cannot survive a brief cameo without hemorrhaging value, he belongs in warmups.

Jamison Battle
Forward Yr 1 67G (2S)
-7.5
3.3 pts
1.5 reb
0.4 ast
8.8 min

Jamison Battle spent this late-season stretch firmly entrenched in garbage-time purgatory, struggling to generate any positive momentum off the bench. His absolute floor arrived on 03/13 vs PHX, where he logged nine minutes of pure cardio while posting a disastrous -17.7 Impact score. When a rotation player registers just one missed shot, a single rebound, and one assist in nearly a quarter of action, that severe negative impact reflects a complete lack of defensive engagement and off-ball utility. Even when his jump shot finally caught fire, the underlying metrics refused to bite. During a season-high 23 minutes on 03/23 vs UTA, Battle poured in 17 points on sharp 4-for-7 perimeter shooting, yet still finished with a -1.3 Impact. Those buckets were ultimately empty calories, dragged into the red by defensive lapses and an inability to string together stops when the opposing second unit attacked him. He saw extended run again on 03/18 vs CHI, but a clunky 6-point night on 2-for-6 shooting yielded a -6.1 Impact, highlighting exactly why his playing time evaporated to mere seconds by April.

Ochai Agbaji
Guard Yr 3 42G (13S)
-7.5
4.3 pts
2.3 reb
0.7 ast
15.5 min

Ochai Agbaji’s mid-season stretch was defined by maddeningly erratic bench production, operating as a wildly volatile swingman whose value lived and died by his jumper. When his shot was actually falling, he looked like an elite rotation piece. He poured in 18 points on a blistering 8-for-9 shooting performance on 03/09 vs MEM, earning a stellar +10.4 Impact score through sheer offensive efficiency. Yet, that same aggression frequently burned his own team when his touch vanished. Look at 03/18 vs OKC, where he managed 10 points but required nine field goal attempts and six three-point heaves to get there. His inefficient shot selection stalled the second-unit offense, resulting in a damaging -6.0 Impact score despite the double-digit scoring total. Even when he crashed the glass to compensate for a cold night, his lack of scoring gravity severely cramped the floor. On 02/11 vs IND, Agbaji grabbed 6 rebounds and dished 2 assists, but his scoreless outing on 0-for-3 shooting dragged his Impact score down to a dismal -8.6 because defenders completely ignored him on the perimeter.

Garrett Temple
Guard-Forward Yr 15 24G
-8.3
0.7 pts
0.4 reb
0.4 ast
3.1 min

Garrett Temple's late-season stretch was defined by microscopic minutes and entirely negative returns. During a brief seven-minute stint on 03/18 vs CHI, he managed just two points and two assists while generating a brutal -11.8 Impact score, dragged down by missing both of his three-point attempts and bleeding overall value on the floor. Even when his shot actually fell, the underlying metrics remained grim. On 03/22 vs PHX, Temple logged a stretch-high eight minutes and hit his only three-pointer for five points, yet still posted a -5.9 Impact score due to his inability to anchor the defense or secure more than a single rebound. The veteran guard routinely checked in just to burn the clock, putting up empty cardio in outings like the 03/29 vs ORL matchup where he went completely scoreless to earn a -8.5 Impact score in three minutes. Ultimately, he served strictly as a warm body at the end of the rotation.

Markelle Fultz
Guard Yr 8 5G
-11.2
0.8 pts
0.2 reb
1.6 ast
7.1 min
L
@ CLE CLE
102 TOR CLE 114
CLE @ CLE
102 114
Sun, May 3
Playoffs Analysis
-12
W
vs CLE CLE
110 CLE TOR 112
CLE vs CLE
112 110
Fri, May 1
Playoffs Analysis
+2
L
@ CLE CLE
120 TOR CLE 125
CLE @ CLE
120 125
Wed, Apr 29
Playoffs Analysis
-5
W
vs CLE CLE
89 CLE TOR 93
CLE vs CLE
93 89
Sun, Apr 26
Playoffs Analysis
+4
W
vs CLE CLE
104 CLE TOR 126
CLE vs CLE
126 104
Thu, Apr 23
Playoffs Analysis
+22
L
@ CLE CLE
105 TOR CLE 115
CLE @ CLE
105 115
Mon, Apr 20
Playoffs Analysis
-10
L
@ CLE CLE
113 TOR CLE 126
CLE @ CLE
113 126
Sat, Apr 18
Playoffs Analysis
-13
W
vs BKN BKN
101 BKN TOR 136
BKN vs BKN
136 101
Sun, Apr 12
Analysis
+35
L
@ NYK NYK
95 TOR NYK 112
NYK @ NYK
95 112
Fri, Apr 10
Analysis
-17
W
vs MIA MIA
114 MIA TOR 128
MIA vs MIA
128 114
Thu, Apr 9
Analysis
+14
W
vs MIA MIA
95 MIA TOR 121
MIA vs MIA
121 95
Tue, Apr 7
Analysis
+26
L
@ BOS BOS
101 TOR BOS 115
BOS @ BOS
101 115
Sun, Apr 5
Analysis
-14
W
@ MEM MEM
128 TOR MEM 96
MEM @ MEM
128 96
Fri, Apr 3
Analysis
+32
L
vs SAC SAC
123 SAC TOR 115
SAC vs SAC
115 123
Wed, Apr 1
Analysis
-8
L
@ DET DET
116 TOR DET 127
DET @ DET
116 127
Tue, Mar 31
Analysis
-11
W
vs ORL ORL
87 ORL TOR 139
ORL vs ORL
139 87
Sun, Mar 29
Analysis
+52
W
vs NOP NOP
106 NOP TOR 119
NOP vs NOP
119 106
Sat, Mar 28
Analysis
+13
L
@ LAC LAC
94 TOR LAC 119
LAC @ LAC
94 119
Wed, Mar 25
Analysis
-25
W
@ UTA UTA
143 TOR UTA 127
UTA @ UTA
143 127
Mon, Mar 23
Analysis
+16
L
@ PHX PHX
98 TOR PHX 120
PHX @ PHX
98 120
Sun, Mar 22
Analysis
-22
L
@ DEN DEN
115 TOR DEN 121
DEN @ DEN
115 121
Fri, Mar 20
Analysis
-6
W
@ CHI CHI
139 TOR CHI 109
CHI @ CHI
139 109
Wed, Mar 18
Analysis
+30
W
vs DET DET
108 DET TOR 119
DET vs DET
119 108
Sun, Mar 15
Analysis
+11
W
vs PHX PHX
115 PHX TOR 122
PHX vs PHX
122 115
Fri, Mar 13
Analysis
+7
L
@ NOP NOP
111 TOR NOP 122
NOP @ NOP
111 122
Wed, Mar 11
Analysis
-11
L
@ HOU HOU
99 TOR HOU 113
HOU @ HOU
99 113
Tue, Mar 10
Analysis
-14
W
vs DAL DAL
92 DAL TOR 122
DAL vs DAL
122 92
Sun, Mar 8
Analysis
+30
L
@ MIN MIN
107 TOR MIN 115
MIN @ MIN
107 115
Thu, Mar 5
Analysis
-8
L
vs NYK NYK
111 NYK TOR 95
NYK vs NYK
95 111
Tue, Mar 3
Analysis
-16
W
@ WAS WAS
134 TOR WAS 125
WAS @ WAS
134 125
Sat, Feb 28
Analysis
+9
L
vs SAS SAS
110 SAS TOR 107
SAS vs SAS
107 110
Wed, Feb 25
Analysis
-3
L
vs OKC OKC
116 OKC TOR 107
OKC vs OKC
107 116
Tue, Feb 24
Analysis
-9
W
@ MIL MIL
122 TOR MIL 94
MIL @ MIL
122 94
Sun, Feb 22
Analysis
+28
W
@ CHI CHI
110 TOR CHI 101
CHI @ CHI
110 101
Thu, Feb 19
Analysis
+9
L
vs DET DET
113 DET TOR 95
DET vs DET
95 113
Wed, Feb 11
Analysis
-18
W
vs IND IND
104 IND TOR 122
IND vs IND
122 104
Sun, Feb 8
Analysis
+18
W
vs CHI CHI
107 CHI TOR 123
CHI vs CHI
123 107
Thu, Feb 5
Analysis
+16
L
vs MIN MIN
128 MIN TOR 126
MIN vs MIN
126 128
Wed, Feb 4
Analysis
-2
W
vs UTA UTA
100 UTA TOR 107
UTA vs UTA
107 100
Sun, Feb 1
Analysis
+7
L
@ ORL ORL
120 TOR ORL 130
ORL @ ORL
120 130
Fri, Jan 30
Analysis
-10
L
vs NYK NYK
119 NYK TOR 92
NYK vs NYK
92 119
Wed, Jan 28
Analysis
-27
W
@ OKC OKC
103 TOR OKC 101
OKC @ OKC
103 101
Mon, Jan 26
Analysis
+2
W
@ POR POR
110 TOR POR 98
POR @ POR
110 98
Sat, Jan 24
Analysis
+12
W
@ SAC SAC
122 TOR SAC 109
SAC @ SAC
122 109
Thu, Jan 22
Analysis
+13
W
@ GSW GSW
145 TOR GSW 127
GSW @ GSW
145 127
Wed, Jan 21
Analysis
+18
L
@ LAL LAL
93 TOR LAL 110
LAL @ LAL
93 110
Mon, Jan 19
Analysis
-17
L
vs LAC LAC
121 LAC TOR 117
LAC vs LAC
117 121
Sat, Jan 17
Analysis
-4
W
@ IND IND
115 TOR IND 101
IND @ IND
115 101
Thu, Jan 15
Analysis
+14
L
vs PHI PHI
115 PHI TOR 102
PHI vs PHI
102 115
Tue, Jan 13
Analysis
-13
W
vs PHI PHI
115 PHI TOR 116
PHI vs PHI
116 115
Sun, Jan 11
Analysis
+1
L
@ BOS BOS
117 TOR BOS 125
BOS @ BOS
117 125
Sat, Jan 10
Analysis
-8
W
@ CHA CHA
97 TOR CHA 96
CHA @ CHA
97 96
Thu, Jan 8
Analysis
+1
W
vs ATL ATL
100 ATL TOR 118
ATL vs ATL
118 100
Tue, Jan 6
Analysis
+18
W
vs ATL ATL
117 ATL TOR 134
ATL vs ATL
134 117
Sun, Jan 4
Analysis
+17
L
vs DEN DEN
106 DEN TOR 103
DEN vs DEN
103 106
Thu, Jan 1
Analysis
-3
W
vs ORL ORL
106 ORL TOR 107
ORL vs ORL
107 106
Tue, Dec 30
Analysis
+1
W
vs GSW GSW
127 GSW TOR 141
GSW vs GSW
141 127
Sun, Dec 28
Analysis
+14
L
@ WAS WAS
117 TOR WAS 138
WAS @ WAS
117 138
Sat, Dec 27
Analysis
-21
W
@ MIA MIA
112 TOR MIA 91
MIA @ MIA
112 91
Wed, Dec 24
Analysis
+21
L
@ BKN BKN
81 TOR BKN 96
BKN @ BKN
81 96
Sun, Dec 21
Analysis
-15
L
vs BOS BOS
112 BOS TOR 96
BOS vs BOS
96 112
Sun, Dec 21
Analysis
-16
W
@ MIL MIL
111 TOR MIL 105
MIL @ MIL
111 105
Fri, Dec 19
Analysis
+6
W
@ MIA MIA
106 TOR MIA 96
MIA @ MIA
106 96
Tue, Dec 16
Analysis
+10
L
vs NYK NYK
117 NYK TOR 101
NYK vs NYK
101 117
Wed, Dec 10
Analysis
-16
L
vs BOS BOS
121 BOS TOR 113
BOS vs BOS
113 121
Sun, Dec 7
Analysis
-8
L
vs CHA CHA
111 CHA TOR 86
CHA vs CHA
86 111
Sat, Dec 6
Analysis
-25
L
vs LAL LAL
123 LAL TOR 120
LAL vs LAL
120 123
Fri, Dec 5
Analysis
-3
W
vs POR POR
118 POR TOR 121
POR vs POR
121 118
Wed, Dec 3
Analysis
+3
L
@ NYK NYK
94 TOR NYK 116
NYK @ NYK
94 116
Sun, Nov 30
Analysis
-22
L
@ CHA CHA
111 TOR CHA 118
CHA @ CHA
111 118
Sat, Nov 29
Analysis
-7
W
vs IND IND
95 IND TOR 97
IND vs IND
97 95
Thu, Nov 27
Analysis
+2
W
vs CLE CLE
99 CLE TOR 110
CLE vs CLE
110 99
Tue, Nov 25
Analysis
+11
W
vs BKN BKN
109 BKN TOR 119
BKN vs BKN
119 109
Sun, Nov 23
Analysis
+10
W
vs WAS WAS
110 WAS TOR 140
WAS vs WAS
140 110
Sat, Nov 22
Analysis
+30
W
@ PHI PHI
121 TOR PHI 112
PHI @ PHI
121 112
Thu, Nov 20
Analysis
+9
W
vs CHA CHA
108 CHA TOR 110
CHA vs CHA
110 108
Tue, Nov 18
Analysis
+2
W
@ IND IND
129 TOR IND 111
IND @ IND
129 111
Sun, Nov 16
Analysis
+18
W
@ CLE CLE
126 TOR CLE 113
CLE @ CLE
126 113
Fri, Nov 14
Analysis
+13
W
@ BKN BKN
119 TOR BKN 109
BKN @ BKN
119 109
Wed, Nov 12
Analysis
+10
L
@ PHI PHI
120 TOR PHI 130
PHI @ PHI
120 130
Sun, Nov 9
Analysis
-10
W
@ ATL ATL
109 TOR ATL 97
ATL @ ATL
109 97
Sat, Nov 8
Analysis
+12
W
vs MIL MIL
100 MIL TOR 128
MIL vs MIL
128 100
Wed, Nov 5
Analysis
+28
W
vs MEM MEM
104 MEM TOR 117
MEM vs MEM
117 104
Sun, Nov 2
Analysis
+13
W
@ CLE CLE
112 TOR CLE 101
CLE @ CLE
112 101
Fri, Oct 31
Analysis
+11
L
vs HOU HOU
139 HOU TOR 121
HOU vs HOU
121 139
Wed, Oct 29
Analysis
-18
L
@ SAS SAS
101 TOR SAS 121
SAS @ SAS
101 121
Mon, Oct 27
Analysis
-20
L
@ DAL DAL
129 TOR DAL 139
DAL @ DAL
129 139
Sun, Oct 26
Analysis
-10
L
vs MIL MIL
122 MIL TOR 116
MIL vs MIL
116 122
Fri, Oct 24
Analysis
-6
W
@ ATL ATL
138 TOR ATL 118
ATL @ ATL
138 118
Wed, Oct 22
Analysis
+20