GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MEM Memphis Grizzlies
S GG Jackson 30.1m
30
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+12.7

An absolute offensive masterclass fueled a massive positive impact, as he scored at will from all three levels. He paired the scoring explosion with relentless energy on the offensive glass, generating crucial second-chance opportunities. His ability to isolate and punish mismatches on the wing completely broke the opponent's defensive scheme.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 7/9 (77.8%)
Advanced
TS% 75.2%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg -14.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Offense +18.2
Hustle +5.3
Defense +3.2
Raw total +26.7
Avg player in 30.1m -14.0
Impact +12.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Cedric Coward 27.2m
15
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.6

Settling for heavily contested looks from deep severely limited his offensive efficiency. He competed hard on the defensive end, using his length to disrupt passing lanes and contest at the rim. However, a pattern of ill-advised early-clock jumpers prevented him from being a net positive.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.8%
USG% 26.2%
Net Rtg -41.8
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Offense +4.8
Hustle +2.9
Defense +3.4
Raw total +11.1
Avg player in 27.2m -12.7
Impact -1.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Javon Small 26.8m
14
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.2

Bleeding points on the defensive end completely erased a relatively productive scoring night. He was repeatedly blown by at the point of attack, forcing the defense into scramble mode and leading to open corner threes. The sheer volume of missed outside shots also stalled out several promising offensive possessions.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -45.4
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Offense +7.0
Hustle +0.7
Defense -2.4
Raw total +5.3
Avg player in 26.8m -12.5
Impact -7.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
9
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.2

A high volume of clanked perimeter shots negated the value of his otherwise solid defensive positioning. He was consistently late on closeouts, allowing spot-up shooters to find a rhythm early in the game. Despite decent hustle numbers, the offensive inefficiency and spacing issues dragged his overall impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -12.7
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Offense +5.6
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.5
Raw total +9.9
Avg player in 26.1m -12.1
Impact -2.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Rayan Rupert 24.8m
4
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.7

Poor shot selection and an inability to finish through contact cratered his offensive value. He struggled to navigate screens defensively, frequently dying on picks and leaving his big men out to dry in drop coverage. A disastrous stretch of forced mid-range jumpers completely stalled the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 28.6%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg -55.0
+/- -30
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Offense -0.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.0
Raw total +0.8
Avg player in 24.8m -11.5
Impact -10.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Toby Okani 28.4m
7
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

Inconsistent finishing around the basket mitigated the value of his otherwise solid rebounding effort. He showed flashes of excellent switchability on defense, staying attached to guards on the perimeter. Ultimately, a few costly live-ball turnovers in transition tipped his overall impact slightly into the negative.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 43.8%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -23.7
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Offense +6.7
Hustle +2.4
Defense +2.1
Raw total +11.2
Avg player in 28.4m -13.2
Impact -2.0
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
8
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.3

An abysmal shooting performance from beyond the arc tanked his offensive rating, as defenders simply dared him to shoot. He surprisingly salvaged his night with excellent weak-side rim protection and disciplined closeouts. The stark contrast between his elite defensive rotations and his offensive bricklaying defined his outing.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.8%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg -15.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Offense -1.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense +6.2
Raw total +7.1
Avg player in 22.3m -10.4
Impact -3.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
Adama Bal 20.1m
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-16.4

A complete disaster on both ends of the floor, characterized by blown defensive assignments and offensive hesitation. He looked lost navigating pick-and-rolls, repeatedly taking poor angles that led to easy layups. Forcing bad passes into traffic further compounded a highly detrimental stint.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -45.3
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Offense -5.6
Hustle +0.4
Defense -1.9
Raw total -7.1
Avg player in 20.1m -9.3
Impact -16.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
5
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.4

Struggled to stay in front of quicker guards, constantly requiring help defense that compromised the team's shape. His offensive contributions were minimal, mostly consisting of passive perimeter ball swings that ate up the shot clock. A lack of physicality on the boards allowed opponents to extend possessions during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -12.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Offense +2.8
Hustle +0.7
Defense -1.5
Raw total +2.0
Avg player in 20.0m -9.4
Impact -7.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.0

Offensive ineptitude severely handicapped his team, as he failed to convert on multiple high-value looks near the rim. The opposition completely ignored him off the ball, destroying the team's spacing and clogging driving lanes. Despite decent effort fighting over screens, his inability to score made him unplayable.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/6 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 15.1%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -39.8
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Offense -7.4
Hustle +2.4
Defense +0.7
Raw total -4.3
Avg player in 14.2m -6.7
Impact -11.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
TOR Toronto Raptors
S RJ Barrett 29.1m
25
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+12.2

Aggressive downhill drives generated constant rim pressure, forcing the defense to collapse and scramble. He paired this offensive onslaught with exceptional effort on 50/50 balls, winning multiple extra possessions. His ability to fight through screens on the perimeter rounded out a dominant two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 28.4%
Net Rtg +40.5
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Offense +15.9
Hustle +5.2
Defense +4.7
Raw total +25.8
Avg player in 29.1m -13.6
Impact +12.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Ja'Kobe Walter 27.8m
7
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.6

Brutal perimeter shooting dragged down his offensive efficiency, but he salvaged his night with sheer effort. He thrived as a point-of-attack pest, hounding ball-handlers and blowing up dribble hand-offs. The relentless defensive energy and rebounding from the guard spot kept his overall impact firmly in the green.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 33.9%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +59.6
+/- +39
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Offense +6.8
Hustle +5.0
Defense +6.7
Raw total +18.5
Avg player in 27.8m -12.9
Impact +5.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Brandon Ingram 26.1m
17
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+8.4

Efficient shot creation fueled a highly positive offensive showing, allowing him to dictate the tempo in the half-court. His length disrupted passing lanes on the other end, translating to solid defensive value. A steady diet of mid-range pull-ups kept the defense off-balance all night.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.0%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg +49.1
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Offense +15.4
Hustle +2.3
Defense +2.9
Raw total +20.6
Avg player in 26.1m -12.2
Impact +8.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Scottie Barnes 23.3m
10
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
-1.8

Passive offensive stretches severely limited his overall impact, allowing the defense to sag and clog the driving lanes. He anchored the defensive rotations beautifully as a weak-side helper, shutting down the paint. However, his reluctance to hunt his own shot ultimately dragged his net rating into the red.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg +26.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.3m
Offense +1.6
Hustle +1.4
Defense +6.0
Raw total +9.0
Avg player in 23.3m -10.8
Impact -1.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jakob Poeltl 22.8m
8
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.5

Scoring volume dipped from his recent tear, but his value remained elite through relentless screen-setting and rim protection. He completely neutralized dribble penetration by dropping perfectly in pick-and-roll coverage. The high-level dirty work kept the offensive flow moving even when he wasn't taking the shots.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg +31.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Offense +10.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.3
Raw total +19.1
Avg player in 22.8m -10.6
Impact +8.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
Jamal Shead 23.2m
11
pts
1
reb
6
ast
Impact
+8.7

Masterful floor generalship defined his minutes, as he consistently manipulated the defense to create high-value looks for teammates. He was an absolute menace in the passing lanes, turning deflections into immediate transition opportunities. Breaking down the primary defender at the point of attack set the tone for the entire unit.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 90.5%
USG% 13.1%
Net Rtg +38.5
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Offense +8.2
Hustle +6.1
Defense +5.2
Raw total +19.5
Avg player in 23.2m -10.8
Impact +8.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
19
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.3

Elite interior finishing drove a massive offensive rating, punishing mismatches on the low block with excellent footwork. He capitalized on every defensive rotation by finding the soft spots in the zone for easy dump-offs. While his defensive impact was quieter, his sheer scoring gravity tilted the floor.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 70.3%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg +45.6
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.0m
Offense +17.3
Hustle +2.7
Defense +1.1
Raw total +21.1
Avg player in 23.0m -10.8
Impact +10.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
10
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.8

Stretching the floor as a trailing big opened up crucial driving lanes, even if his own outside shots weren't falling at his usual clip. He made up for the shooting dip by crashing the glass hard and keeping plays alive with timely tip-outs. His mobility on the perimeter allowed the defense to switch comfortably late in the shot clock.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 65.4%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg +2.3
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Offense +8.0
Hustle +3.2
Defense +1.3
Raw total +12.5
Avg player in 20.9m -9.7
Impact +2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
A.J. Lawson 12.6m
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.6

Capitalized on his limited run by providing immediate defensive resistance against opposing wings. He stayed disciplined on closeouts, running shooters off the line without fouling. A couple of well-timed backdoor cuts showcased his offensive awareness and efficiency.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 29.6%
Net Rtg -22.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Offense +2.6
Hustle +2.8
Defense +4.1
Raw total +9.5
Avg player in 12.6m -5.9
Impact +3.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.8

Failed to make a tangible mark during his brief stint, struggling to find a rhythm within the offensive flow. He was repeatedly targeted in isolation, forcing defensive rotations that compromised the shell. The lack of offensive aggression made it easy for defenders to cheat off him.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +7.2
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.5m
Offense -1.2
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.3
Raw total -0.9
Avg player in 8.5m -3.9
Impact -4.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.8

Broke out of a severe shooting slump by attacking closeouts rather than settling for contested jumpers. His off-ball movement forced defensive miscommunications, creating gravity that benefited the entire lineup. He still gave some of that value back by getting caught ball-watching on the weak side defensively.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 42.1%
Net Rtg +21.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.0m
Offense +6.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.5
Raw total +6.0
Avg player in 7.0m -3.2
Impact +2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.5

Maximized a very short leash by executing his role perfectly as a rim-runner. He sealed his man early in transition to generate an easy deep-post touch. The flawless execution in limited minutes provided a quick, positive jolt to the frontcourt rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.5%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +16.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.7m
Offense +4.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.6
Raw total +5.1
Avg player in 5.7m -2.6
Impact +2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.6

A complete zero offensively, he operated purely as a spacing liability during his short stint. He did manage to salvage some value by anchoring the paint and contesting shots well at the rim. Ultimately, the inability to threaten the defense allowed opponents to load up on the primary scorers.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg +16.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.7m
Offense -1.4
Hustle +0.4
Defense +2.1
Raw total +1.1
Avg player in 5.7m -2.7
Impact -1.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.2

Barely saw the floor but managed to convert his only opportunity within the flow of the offense. He provided adequate spacing from the corner, preventing his defender from helping in the paint. A perfectly neutral stint where he neither hurt nor significantly helped the overall scheme.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg +9.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.5m
Offense +2.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.3
Raw total +2.3
Avg player in 4.5m -2.1
Impact +0.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0