GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Jalen Johnson 34.8m
22
pts
7
reb
8
ast
Impact
+12.4

Smothering isolation defense (+4.8 Def) was the hallmark of his night, routinely shutting down the opponent's primary wing creator. However, his overall impact was suppressed by clunky spacing and forced drives into heavy traffic. He accumulated raw stats efficiently but struggled to elevate the lineup's overall offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.2%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg -16.4
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +16.0
Creation +4.2
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +2.1
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Trae Young 34.3m
22
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.1

Poor shot selection from deep torpedoed his overall value (-2.9 Total) despite high-level playmaking. Opponents capitalized on long rebounds from his missed pull-up jumpers to ignite their transition game. He tried to compensate with active hands in the passing lanes (+4.2 Hustle), but the inefficient volume scoring was too costly.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 11/13 (84.6%)
Advanced
TS% 55.8%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg -19.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring +14.6
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 69.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
20
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.1

Stretched the floor to its breaking point with lethal pick-and-pop execution from beyond the arc. His rim protection (+2.8 Def) deterred several drives, effectively shrinking the paint for opposing slashers. The combination of deep spacing and interior deterrence drove a highly impactful two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.3%
USG% 23.6%
Net Rtg -15.4
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +14.6
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +7.0
Defense -2.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
S Dyson Daniels 22.7m
4
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.9

Generated absolute chaos defensively with elite deflection numbers and loose ball recoveries (+5.2 Hustle). Unfortunately, his offensive passivity completely stalled the half-court execution, allowing defenders to play five-on-four. The resulting scoring droughts heavily outweighed his spectacular effort plays.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -3.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.2
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
16
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.2

Found immense success cutting back-door against a sleeping defense, generating a flurry of easy finishes at the rim. His aggressive rim pressure (+13.5 Box) forced early rotations and put the opponent in foul trouble. Maintained solid positional discipline on defense to protect his positive offensive output.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg -28.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +11.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Luke Kennard 30.4m
6
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-11.7

Bleeding points in transition and failing to connect on his signature catch-and-shoot looks resulted in a disastrous overall shift (-15.9 Total). The defense actively targeted his lack of lateral quickness on switches, forcing continuous breakdowns. When his perimeter shot isn't falling, his inability to pressure the rim makes him a severe liability.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.3%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
18
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.2

Dominated the interior with a relentless diet of hard rolls and explosive finishes through contact. His activity on the offensive glass (+4.4 Hustle) generated crucial extra possessions that broke the opponent's back. Showed excellent discipline in drop coverage to anchor a highly successful stint on both ends.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.3%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg -29.7
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +4.7
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 57.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
10
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-4.0

Endured a catastrophic shooting night that consistently killed offensive momentum and bailed out the defense. He miraculously kept his overall impact near neutral by playing absolutely maniacal perimeter defense (+10.5 Hustle, +4.3 Def). His relentless screen navigation and ball pressure almost entirely offset his offensive zeroes.

Shooting
FG 2/15 (13.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 28.3%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg -1.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring -0.2
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +3.1
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.1

Was a complete non-factor offensively, failing to register a single shot attempt while disrupting the unit's spacing. Opponents aggressively helped off him to crowd the paint, stalling the entire offensive engine. His brief stint was defined by a lack of assertiveness that dragged down the lineup's efficiency.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.0%
Net Rtg -48.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.7

Provided a brief burst of functional length, executing his defensive rotations cleanly to avoid giving up easy looks. Stayed completely out of the way offensively, acting strictly as a spacer and screener. A perfectly neutral cameo that bought the starters valuable rest without sacrificing the lead.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +50.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
TOR Toronto Raptors
S Scottie Barnes 31.9m
22
pts
6
reb
9
ast
Impact
+15.5

Dominated the interior matchups by aggressively attacking mismatches in the post. His massive box score impact (+20.9) was fueled by highly efficient rim pressure rather than settling for jumpers. Active hands in the passing lanes (+4.7 Hustle) created easy transition opportunities that blew the game open.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.8%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +12.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +18.4
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +1.8
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S RJ Barrett 30.0m
25
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+19.8

Phenomenal shot selection translated into a highly efficient scoring night that anchored the offense. He consistently beat closeouts to collapse the defense, generating high-value looks at the rim. A strong defensive effort (+3.9) fighting through screens ensured he was a massive net positive on both ends.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.0%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg +3.2
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +22.8
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +10.2
Defense -1.8
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
13
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
-3.9

Perimeter inefficiency completely tanked his overall value (-5.1 Total) despite high energy metrics. Forcing contested threes early in the shot clock led to long rebounds and opponent fast breaks. He tried to compensate with aggressive on-ball pressure (+4.2 Hustle), but the offensive dead possessions were too costly.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 0/7 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.2%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg +12.9
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Brandon Ingram 26.9m
16
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.8

Impact cratered by offensive stagnation and poor spacing when he operated as a mid-range hub. His inability to stretch the floor allowed the defense to pack the paint, completely stalling the half-court engine. Solid individual defensive metrics (+4.8) couldn't salvage a heavily negative overall shift.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 46.2%
USG% 29.3%
Net Rtg +20.9
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.9m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +8.5
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -11.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jakob Poeltl 22.4m
14
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.5

Elite finishing around the basket drove a massive offensive rating during his shifts. However, his overall impact was muted by struggles in drop coverage (-1.2 Def) against the pick-and-roll. Opposing guards consistently exploited his positioning to generate uncontested floaters.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.9%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -5.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +12.8
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +6.7
Defense -5.8
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Gradey Dick 24.0m
21
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+17.1

Completely warped the opposing defense with relentless off-ball movement that generated clean catch-and-shoot opportunities. His gravity opened up driving lanes for teammates, amplifying his massive box score contribution (+18.5). Held up surprisingly well at the point of attack (+2.8 Def) to cement a stellar two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 77.7%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +29.1
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.0m
Scoring +17.6
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +4.4
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Ochai Agbaji 19.9m
4
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.4

Operated strictly as a defensive specialist, using his length to disrupt perimeter actions (+4.0 Def). His offensive limitations kept his overall impact neutral, as defenders routinely sagged off him to clog the driving lanes. A few timely extra-effort plays (+4.0 Hustle) kept his shift from slipping into the negative.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +34.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Jamal Shead 19.3m
10
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+0.3

Dictated the tempo perfectly during his minutes, utilizing hard drives to collapse the paint and spray out to shooters. His relentless ball pressure (+4.0 Hustle) forced opposing guards into rushed decisions and late-clock situations. A highly disciplined floor game maximized his positive impact without requiring high usage.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.0%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg +22.3
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
7
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.1

Struggled to anchor the rebounding glass, giving up crucial second-chance opportunities that dragged down his net score. While he connected on his limited offensive touches, his inability to contain stronger forwards in the post proved detrimental. The resulting defensive rotations left shooters wide open on the weak side.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +60.9
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -4.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
4
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.6

Provided a sturdy interior presence by setting bone-crushing screens that freed up the primary ball handlers. His positive defensive impact (+2.0) stemmed from excellent verticality at the rim, altering several shots without fouling. Stayed within his role to deliver a highly efficient, low-mistake stint.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.3

Failed to make a dent offensively, as his inability to create separation resulted in stagnant possessions. A lack of secondary effort plays (+0.2 Hustle) meant he couldn't salvage his quiet shooting night through grit. Opponents successfully targeted his closeouts, leading to a slightly negative overall shift.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +16.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.1m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0