2025-26 Season
GARY HARRIS
2025-26 Season
GARY HARRIS
Harris produces at an poor rate for a 14-minute workload.
Harris produces at an poor rate for a 14-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 17 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Gary Harris spent the first sixteen games of the season fading into offensive irrelevance at the end of the bench. When a veteran guard refuses to look at the rim, the hidden cost is a stagnant half-court offense forced to play four-on-five. Look at the 12/06 vs PHI disaster. Harris logged 21 empty minutes, attempting just a single shot for zero points and dragging his team down with a catastrophic -16.7 Impact. Even his highest-scoring night on 11/15 vs CHA yielded a negative return. Despite an efficient 10 points on 4-of-5 shooting in 23 minutes, his complete lack of playmaking—registering zero assists—kept his overall Impact at a negative -1.7. He occasionally salvaged his shifts through peripheral hustle. During a scoreless outing on 11/30 vs BKN, he crashed the glass for 5 rebounds and dished 4 assists to keep his Impact at a manageable -3.3, but grit alone cannot mask his vanishing scoring touch.
This 16-game stretch was defined by Gary Harris becoming an absolute offensive ghost off the bench. Look no further than his brutal outing on 12/12 vs BOS, where he logged 33 minutes but failed to score a single point on 0-for-3 shooting, resulting in a disastrous -14.6 Impact score. When a veteran guard plays over a half-hour without generating any scoring gravity, the floor shrinks for his teammates, heavily penalizing his overall value. He occasionally found a brief rhythm, like on 12/27 vs MEM when he tallied a stretch-high 8 points on perfect 3-of-3 shooting. That rare burst of efficiency earned him a +3.8 Impact score, revealing that he can still be a net positive when he actually looks at the rim. Unfortunately, those moments were fleeting anomalies in a sea of passivity. By the time he posted zero points and zero field goal attempts in 11 minutes on 12/22 vs MIN for a -12.1 Impact score, it was obvious his extreme reluctance to shoot was bleeding the second unit dry.
Gary Harris spent this brutal midseason stretch tumbling out of the starting lineup and fading into offensive irrelevance. The veteran lost his starting job shortly after a dismal outing on 01/24 vs DEN, where he logged 28 minutes but managed just four points on 1-for-5 shooting. That inefficient performance and total lack of playmaking earned him a -7.0 impact score. His subsequent move to the second unit offered no relief. During the 01/28 vs PHI matchup, Harris posted a staggering -14.3 impact in just 14 minutes off the bench because he failed to attempt a single shot, actively hurting his team by running empty cardio. Even when he finally found the basket later in the year, the underlying metrics remained grim. He scored a stretch-high seven points on 04/07 vs BKN, yet still recorded a -2.1 impact because the hidden cost of his clunky 3-for-9 shooting dragged down the offensive flow.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Harris has posted negative impact in 96% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Average defender. Harris doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.
Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -7.2, second-half -6.7. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.
In a rough stretch — 26 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 26 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 64 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
48 games played