Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
TOR lead PHI lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHI 2P — 3P —
TOR 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 166 attempts

PHI PHI Shot-making Δ

Embiid 9/17 +1.0
Maxey Hard 10/16 +11.6
George Hard 5/13 -0.8
Edgecombe Hard 5/7 +7.8
Oubre Jr. 3/7 -0.7
Grimes Hard 2/3 +1.8
Walker 2/3 +1.4
Barlow Open 2/3 +0.6
Lowry Hard 0/3 -2.7
McCain Open 1/1 +0.6

TOR TOR Shot-making Δ

Quickley Hard 8/18 +0.3
Barnes 5/16 -5.9
Ingram 5/15 -5.0
Lawson 5/9 +2.3
Murray-Boyles Open 6/9 -0.6
Mamukelashvili Open 3/7 -2.7
Dick Hard 1/6 -4.7
Shead Hard 1/5 -2.8
Martin Hard 1/3 -1.2
Battle Hard 1/2 +0.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHI
TOR
39/74 Field Goals 37/92
52.7% Field Goal % 40.2%
16/36 3-Pointers 6/37
44.4% 3-Point % 16.2%
21/23 Free Throws 22/25
91.3% Free Throw % 88.0%
68.4% True Shooting % 49.5%
47 Total Rebounds 48
5 Offensive 15
31 Defensive 23
22 Assists 29
1.38 Assist/TO Ratio 3.22
16 Turnovers 9
4 Steals 7
2 Blocks 2
24 Fouls 19
38 Points in Paint 54
5 Fast Break Pts 15
10 Points off TOs 19
11 Second Chance Pts 19
21 Bench Points 37
33 Largest Lead 4
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Tyrese Maxey
33 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 34.9 MIN
+30.79
2
Collin Murray-Boyles
12 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 31.8 MIN
+19.0
3
Joel Embiid
27 PTS · 8 REB · 4 AST · 35.7 MIN
+16.81
4
VJ Edgecombe
15 PTS · 2 REB · 8 AST · 33.5 MIN
+13.34
5
Immanuel Quickley
18 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 32.2 MIN
+12.77
6
Brandon Ingram
17 PTS · 10 REB · 7 AST · 34.4 MIN
+12.2
7
A.J. Lawson
14 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 17.2 MIN
+9.89
8
Scottie Barnes
15 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 35.2 MIN
+8.16
9
Paul George
15 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 28.6 MIN
+7.28
10
Alijah Martin
6 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 12.6 MIN
+7.03
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:05 T. Watford REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 115–102
Q4 0:08 MISS O. Agbaji 25' 3PT 115–102
Q4 0:12 J. Mogbo REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 115–102
Q4 0:16 MISS K. Lowry 29' 3PT 115–102
Q4 0:25 A. Bona REBOUND (Off:1 Def:1) 115–102
Q4 0:29 T. Watford BLOCK (1 BLK) 115–102
Q4 0:29 MISS A. Martin 28' step back 3PT - blocked 115–102
Q4 0:42 O. Agbaji REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 115–102
Q4 0:42 MISS A. Bona putback Layup 115–102
Q4 0:43 A. Bona REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 115–102
Q4 0:46 MISS K. Lowry 28' 3PT 115–102
Q4 0:59 A. Martin Free Throw 2 of 2 (6 PTS) 115–102
Q4 0:59 A. Martin Free Throw 1 of 2 (5 PTS) 115–101
Q4 0:59 J. Edwards personal FOUL (1 PF) (Martin 2 FT) 115–100
Q4 1:13 J. Battle REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 115–100

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

TOR Toronto Raptors
S Scottie Barnes 35.2m
15
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.3

Elite defensive disruption was completely undone by an abysmal offensive showing and poor shot selection. He consistently settled for heavily contested perimeter looks instead of leveraging his size in the paint. The defensive versatility was brilliant, but the bricked jumpers stalled out multiple transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 5/16 (31.2%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.2%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg -18.3
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Brandon Ingram 34.4m
17
pts
10
reb
7
ast
Impact
+12.2

High-volume playmaking and defensive rebounding barely kept his head above water amidst a brutal shooting slump. He forced too many contested mid-range pull-ups, clanking away valuable possessions. However, his willingness to crash the glass and find cutters mitigated the damage of his cold hand.

Shooting
FG 5/15 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg -14.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +4.1
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +12.7
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
18
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+14.4

A horrific night from beyond the arc nearly erased the value of his aggressive downhill drives. He kept firing despite the cold streak, leading to empty possessions that fueled opponent run-outs. Only his pesky on-ball defense and interior finishing kept him from falling into the negative.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg -19.5
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +4.7
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+11.6

Dominated the dirty work with elite hustle metrics and suffocating interior defense. He consistently beat his man to loose balls and converted high-percentage looks around the rim. His relentless motor on the offensive glass created crucial second-chance opportunities that broke the opponent's spirit.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -6.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.8m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +8.9
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 35.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jamal Shead 30.3m
3
pts
1
reb
6
ast
Impact
-4.4

Incredible hustle and point-of-attack defense couldn't fully compensate for his offensive invisibility. He was a terror in the passing lanes, but his inability to knock down open perimeter shots allowed the defense to sag off completely. The playmaking was solid, yet the lack of scoring gravity stalled half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 27.6%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -8.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.3

A sharp regression in scoring efficiency and missed perimeter assignments tanked his overall value. He struggled to anchor the backup frontcourt, frequently getting outmuscled on the block by stronger bigs. The lack of his usual offensive punch left the second unit searching for answers.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/5 (40.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.5%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg -24.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
A.J. Lawson 17.2m
14
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.3

Caught fire from the perimeter to provide a massive, unexpected scoring jolt off the bench. He stretched the floor beautifully and attacked closeouts with decisive energy. This sudden offensive explosion completely tilted the momentum during the non-starter minutes.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.2%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +5.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.1

Injected timely offensive life into the second unit despite minor defensive miscommunications. He capitalized on broken plays, finding soft spots in the zone to convert efficiently. The quick burst of scoring broke a stagnant stretch, providing just enough lift to secure a positive rating.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -39.1
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Gradey Dick 11.7m
4
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.2

A catastrophic shooting night from deep completely neutralized his primary value as a floor spacer. Opponents quickly realized he was cold and began aggressively stunting off him to crowd the paint. Compounding the offensive woes, he was repeatedly targeted and blown by on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.1%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -42.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring -0.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.6

Faded into the background during his stint, failing to generate enough volume to impact the game positively. He was too passive when the ball swung his way, passing up decent looks to reset the offense. The lack of aggression allowed the defense to rest while he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg -48.0
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.9m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.0

Relied entirely on veteran defensive positioning to carve out a positive impact without taking a single shot. He expertly navigated screens and communicated switches, stabilizing the backline. His cerebral approach to team defense proved valuable in a short burst.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.9

Maximized a tiny window of playing time by finishing his lone opportunity and playing disciplined defense. He didn't force any action, simply taking what the defense gave him in the flow of the offense. A quick, mistake-free shift that kept the team in the green.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

Offered virtually nothing during a brief appearance, missing his only look and failing to record a single hustle stat. He was a step slow on defensive rotations, allowing easy middle penetration. A completely flat stint that dragged down the lineup's overall energy.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHI Philadelphia 76ers
S Joel Embiid 35.7m
27
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
+19.9

Dominated the interior with a massive defensive presence that completely altered the opponent's shot profile at the rim. His two-way physical imposition fueled a massive positive swing, anchoring the drop coverage with elite rim protection. The combination of paint deterrence and steady offensive gravity dictated the game's entire tempo.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 37.3%
Net Rtg +19.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Scoring +21.1
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +10.2
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -14.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 7
S Tyrese Maxey 34.9m
33
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+36.2

An absolute offensive masterclass defined by relentless downhill attacks and elite shot-making from deep. He single-handedly broke the opposing defensive shell, generating massive box-score value that dwarfed his modest hustle metrics. His ability to hit contested pull-up jumpers in isolation broke the opponent's back and fueled a massive run.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 6/9 (66.7%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.5%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg +17.3
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +28.7
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +7.9
Hustle +2.2
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S VJ Edgecombe 33.5m
15
pts
2
reb
8
ast
Impact
+5.0

Lethal perimeter spacing drove a highly efficient offensive outing that masked an otherwise quiet defensive showing. He stretched the defense to its breaking point by punishing late closeouts from the corners with a quick release. The sheer gravity of his outside stroke opened up driving lanes for the entire unit.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 5/6 (83.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 107.1%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg +8.7
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +13.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Paul George 28.6m
15
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+2.7

A heavy regression in shooting efficiency dragged down his overall impact, particularly struggling to connect from beyond the arc. Despite generating solid hustle metrics, the inability to find his usual scoring rhythm stunted the offense's ceiling. He settled for tough, contested perimeter looks rather than attacking the paint to draw contact.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.3%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg +11.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Dominick Barlow 25.3m
4
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.3

Lack of offensive involvement severely capped his overall value despite chipping in effectively on the defensive end. His streak of highly efficient scoring nights came to a halt as he struggled to establish deep post position against a physical frontcourt. The defensive rotations were crisp, but the total absence of rim pressure proved costly.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 6.0%
Net Rtg +17.5
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.3m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.8
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 23.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.1

A brutal negative swing driven by defensive lapses and a total lack of offensive rhythm. He failed to capitalize on transition opportunities and repeatedly lost his man on back-door cuts. The sharp drop in his usual scoring volume left a glaring hole in the second-unit offense.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +20.7
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.5m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +3.1
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.8

Poor point-of-attack defense allowed opposing guards to consistently break the paint, tanking his overall impact. While he hit a couple of timely shots, his inability to navigate screens compromised the entire defensive scheme. The lack of secondary playmaking further compounded his struggles to stay in the green.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg +19.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.6m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.4

Despite a slight uptick in scoring efficiency, a lack of physical engagement on the margins kept him in the red. He failed to generate any meaningful hustle plays or loose-ball recoveries during his stint. The defensive positioning was adequate, but he lacked the aggression needed to swing momentum on the glass.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg +43.3
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Adem Bona 12.3m
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

Completely neutralized on the offensive end, failing to register a single point and clogging the spacing. He offered minor resistance in the paint, but his inability to finish through contact or secure deep catches rendered him a liability. Opponents simply ignored him in the half-court, effectively turning the game into a 4-on-5.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.3m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.7

Managed to stay net-neutral in limited action by contributing just enough energy plays to offset defensive missteps. His scoring punch vanished, but he kept the ball moving and avoided costly mistakes. A quick burst of perimeter hustle prevented his brief stint from bleeding points.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg -6.8
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Kyle Lowry 1.9m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.0

A disastrous brief cameo defined by forced, bricked perimeter shots that immediately killed offensive momentum. He tried to spark the offense with quick triggers but only succeeded in handing the opponent long rebounds. The veteran's shot selection was highly questionable given the game state and flow.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 60.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Salvaged a positive impact entirely through sharp defensive rotations in a fleeting appearance. Even without attempting a shot, his ability to blow up a key pick-and-roll action provided immediate value. He executed the defensive scheme perfectly during his short run to keep the unit afloat.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.4m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.5

Provided empty minutes with absolutely zero statistical production across the board. He was targeted on defense during his brief appearance, giving up easy penetration off the dribble. The lack of any tangible energy or hustle essentially made his stint a deadweight possession.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.4m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0