GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Harrison Barnes 32.0m
18
pts
0
reb
5
ast
Impact
+9.1

Blistering perimeter efficiency heavily inflated his box score metrics (+13.8 Box), masking a relatively quiet night in the hustle departments. Opponents largely matched his offensive explosion when he was on the floor, resulting in a surprisingly flat final impact score (+0.1) despite the scoring surge.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 114.2%
USG% 15.3%
Net Rtg +14.4
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +17.2
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
24
pts
15
reb
4
ast
Impact
+24.3

Completely terrorized the paint on both ends, utilizing his unparalleled length to generate a massive defensive rating (+9.7 Def) that suffocated drivers. Pairing that rim protection with near-perfect shot selection around the basket, he orchestrated a game-defining positive swing (+17.3) whenever he stepped on the hardwood.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 10/10 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 96.8%
USG% 23.6%
Net Rtg +49.0
+/- +35
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Scoring +22.9
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +6.4
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
S Stephon Castle 30.6m
22
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+14.1

Set the tone physically by hounding ball-handlers at the point of attack, generating a stellar defensive rating (+5.8 Def) that disrupted the opponent's primary actions. That relentless defensive pressure, combined with aggressive downhill drives, cemented a highly productive two-way performance (+2.6).

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 9/14 (64.3%)
Advanced
TS% 60.6%
USG% 34.3%
Net Rtg +21.6
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Scoring +14.8
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +6.3
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -11.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Devin Vassell 30.0m
15
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.8

High-motor defensive rotations (+4.3 Def) and a willingness to scrap for loose balls (+3.9 Hustle) anchored his value in this matchup. Even with a slightly erratic outside shot, his relentless energy on the margins ensured he remained a net positive (+1.4) for the rotation.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.3%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg +28.7
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
9
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.3

Clanking several open looks from beyond the arc stunted the offensive rhythm and ultimately dragged his net rating into the red (-3.6). He partially salvaged his minutes by competing hard on the perimeter (+3.6 Def), but the missed floor-spacing opportunities proved too costly.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 54.1%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.4m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +2.7
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Dylan Harper 26.7m
11
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
+5.7

A dip in his usual finishing efficiency snapped a five-game hot streak and slightly depressed his overall rating (-1.0). While he still facilitated well and competed on defense (+1.6 Def), the missed opportunities in the mid-range kept his impact hovering just below neutral.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +11.3
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.7m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +5.7
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+7.6

Picked his spots perfectly within the flow of the offense, punishing closeouts with highly efficient shot-making. He anchored that opportunistic scoring with stout, physical defense (+5.0 Def) that prevented easy penetration, driving a solid positive impact (+2.5) during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +1.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +8.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +3.4
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.6

Operated strictly as a space-eater inside, but his inability to threaten the defense offensively allowed opponents to aggressively double-team elsewhere. Despite bringing his trademark physicality to the glass (+1.6 Hustle), the lack of offensive gravity resulted in a slight negative swing (-1.4).

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 3.2%
Net Rtg -48.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.4m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.5

Struggled to find the rhythm offensively, as forced shots against set defenses cratered his overall impact (-4.8). He managed to hold his own on the defensive end (+2.1 Def), but the empty offensive trips consistently stalled the second unit's momentum.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +29.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.2m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
5
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.2

Completely flipped the momentum during a brief bench stint by applying relentless ball pressure (+3.1 Def) that rushed the opponent's decision-making. He capitalized on the resulting chaos by knocking down a timely perimeter shot, maximizing his value (+4.5) in just ten minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +11.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.1m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.3

Barely factored into the game script during a two-minute run at the end of the night. He kept the ball moving and avoided mistakes, resulting in a perfectly neutral impact score (+0.1).

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.3

Made the most of a garbage-time cameo by immediately attacking the rim and generating a quick bucket. His brief burst of energy (+0.7 Hustle) ensured the team didn't bleed points during the final possessions (+0.8).

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.4

A brief, cardio-only appearance at the tail end of the rotation yielded no statistical production. The opponent happened to score during his fleeting seconds on the floor, resulting in a slightly negative mathematical blip (-1.1).

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
TOR Toronto Raptors
S Brandon Ingram 32.2m
14
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.9

Perimeter struggles defined his night, as clanking his attempts from deep allowed defenders to sag off and clog the paint. While his defensive rotations (+2.1 Def) were crisp enough to prevent a total collapse, the lack of floor-spacing ultimately dragged his net impact into the red (-1.2).

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.9%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg -27.9
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S RJ Barrett 32.2m
25
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+13.6

Aggressive downhill drives fueled a massive box-score bump (+15.1 Box), forcing the defense to collapse and create secondary actions. Even with a streaky outside touch, his physical point-of-attack defense (+2.5 Def) ensured his high-usage role resulted in a net positive (+3.7) for the lineup.

Shooting
FG 9/18 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg -17.5
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +17.7
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
15
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
+16.8

Elite two-way activity defined this performance, highlighted by suffocating perimeter defense (+6.3 Def) that completely disrupted the opponent's rhythm. He paired that relentless hustle (+4.2 Hustle) with timely, highly efficient shot selection to generate a massive overall swing (+9.9) when on the floor.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 77.8%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.6m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Scottie Barnes 29.6m
8
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.8

A bizarrely passive offensive showing cratered his overall impact (-10.6) as he vanished from the primary action for long stretches. Despite showing some resistance on the defensive end (+2.3 Def), his reluctance to attack the rim left the half-court offense completely stagnant.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -13.1
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.9
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jakob Poeltl 24.0m
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-19.4

An uncharacteristic inability to finish around the basket broke a five-game streak of high-efficiency shooting and tanked his overall rating (-14.4). He still fought hard on the glass and altered shots inside (+2.0 Def), but the blown layups and empty offensive possessions were too costly to overcome.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -22.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.0m
Scoring -1.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
19
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+13.9

Absolutely took over the game with game-wrecking defensive instincts (+10.6 Def) that repeatedly flipped opponent actions into transition opportunities. Extending his streak of highly efficient shooting nights, he combined relentless hustle (+3.8 Hustle) with confident stroke mechanics to post a dominant overall rating (+13.3).

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -32.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +4.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
5
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.5

A drastic drop in offensive involvement limited his ability to influence the game, despite perfect execution on his rare touches. He battled well in the trenches (+2.8 Hustle), but the sheer lack of usage allowed the opposing frontcourt to rest on defense, hurting the team's overall flow (-3.8).

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Jamal Shead 16.4m
6
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-9.0

Poor shot selection from the perimeter stalled out several second-unit possessions and drove his impact score into the negatives (-5.9). Without his usual defensive bite (-0.5 Def) to compensate for the clanking jumpers, his minutes ultimately bled value.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.6%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -23.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.4m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Ochai Agbaji 12.3m
4
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.2

Provided a crucial spark off the bench by locking in on his defensive assignments (+2.6 Def) and fighting through screens. Capitalizing on opportunistic cuts rather than forcing shots, his disciplined two-way effort yielded a steady positive impact (+2.3) in limited action.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +22.4
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.3m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.1

Defensive lapses (-1.1 Def) against quicker guards routinely compromised the team's shell during his rotation block. While he managed to knock down a perimeter look, his inability to stay in front of his man drove a noticeably negative overall swing (-4.0).

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -42.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.6

Failed to bend the defense during a brief stint, as missing his perimeter looks allowed opponents to cheat off him and crowd the driving lanes. He brought commendable energy to loose balls (+2.9 Hustle), but the lack of spacing gravity rendered his minutes a net negative (-3.5).

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg +31.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.9m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.4

Maximized a microscopic stint on the floor by converting his only look and executing defensive rotations cleanly (+0.9 Def). It was a brief but flawless cameo that kept the momentum moving in the right direction (+2.1).

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0