GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

TOR Toronto Raptors
S Brandon Ingram 38.6m
31
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
+10.9

An explosive offensive breakout fueled by lethal mid-range shot creation and decisive rim attacks. His +8.4 defensive impact was a pleasant surprise, featuring multiple strong contests against isolation drives. He completely dictated the tempo in the third quarter, forcing the defense into impossible double-binds.

Shooting
FG 11/18 (61.1%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.0%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg -8.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Offense +21.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense +8.4
Raw total +32.5
Avg player in 38.6m -21.6
Impact +10.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Scottie Barnes 37.5m
13
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-10.6

Impact cratered due to a disastrous shooting performance and forced offensive initiation. While his weak-side rim protection remained solid, clanking five perimeter jumpers killed multiple rallies. The offense bogged down every time he tried to bulldoze his way into a set defense.

Shooting
FG 6/18 (33.3%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 36.1%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg -28.2
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Offense +2.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense +5.8
Raw total +10.4
Avg player in 37.5m -21.0
Impact -10.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jamal Shead 33.5m
18
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
-0.4

High-volume shooting masked a wildly inconsistent floor game that ultimately washed out to a neutral impact. He hit some spectacular momentum threes, but his shot selection early in the shot clock disrupted the team's offensive flow. The defensive effort was there, yet the erratic offensive decision-making prevented a positive net rating.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.7%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -6.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Offense +12.4
Hustle +2.9
Defense +3.0
Raw total +18.3
Avg player in 33.5m -18.7
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ochai Agbaji 25.6m
3
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

Dragged down the starting unit by passing up open looks and failing to punish closeouts. He graded out fine defensively, but his offensive timidity allowed the defense to completely ignore him on the perimeter. A crucial missed corner three in the fourth quarter perfectly encapsulated his struggles.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 33.8%
USG% 6.6%
Net Rtg -16.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Offense +2.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense +3.1
Raw total +7.9
Avg player in 25.6m -14.3
Impact -6.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Jakob Poeltl 24.8m
10
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.4

Anchored the interior with textbook verticality and efficient roll-man finishing. His +3.8 hustle score reflects a series of crucial tip-outs that extended possessions during a tight second quarter. Played within himself, punishing defensive rotations without clogging the paint.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 71.4%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -36.5
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Offense +11.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.1
Raw total +20.3
Avg player in 24.8m -13.9
Impact +6.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.3

Despite decent box metrics, his overall impact slipped into the negative due to poor spatial awareness in the half-court. He clogged the driving lanes for the primary creators and struggled to execute dribble hand-offs cleanly. A few solid hustle plays on the offensive glass couldn't completely erase the structural offensive issues he caused.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +26.7
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.5m
Offense +7.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense +1.1
Raw total +10.7
Avg player in 21.5m -12.0
Impact -1.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
13
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.4

Provided a massive spark off the bench by hunting his shot with supreme confidence. His +10.4 box impact was driven entirely by elite spacing and capitalizing on catch-and-shoot opportunities. He was targeted on defense a few times, but the sheer efficiency of his perimeter scoring kept him in the green.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 81.3%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -12.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.3m
Offense +10.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.6
Raw total +11.6
Avg player in 18.3m -10.2
Impact +1.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.4

A massive drop-off from his recent scoring tear, plagued by rushed attempts around the basket. He competed hard on the defensive glass, but his inability to finish through contact derailed the second unit's spacing. Opponents successfully neutralized him by switching smaller, quicker guards onto him in the post.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -34.5
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.0m
Offense -0.8
Hustle +1.6
Defense +3.2
Raw total +4.0
Avg player in 15.0m -8.4
Impact -4.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.6

Hemorrhaged value during his brief eight minutes by tossing up three empty perimeter attempts. The offense looked completely disjointed with him at the helm, failing to generate any downhill pressure. His inability to stay in front of straight-line drives compounded the offensive woes.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -53.9
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.4m
Offense -3.6
Hustle +1.1
Defense -0.4
Raw total -2.9
Avg player in 8.4m -4.7
Impact -7.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.8

An absolute disaster of a stint where his inability to hit open shots completely killed the spacing. Defenders aggressively stunted off him, daring him to shoot, and he failed to make them pay. The negative impact was exacerbated by getting blown by on closeouts defensively.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg -75.8
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.6m
Offense -6.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.5
Raw total -5.6
Avg player in 7.6m -4.2
Impact -9.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.9

Generated a surprisingly positive impact in under three minutes entirely through disruptive perimeter defense. He forced a key live-ball turnover that led to transition free throws. The missed shots didn't matter because his energy instantly changed the defensive complexion.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Offense +0.3
Hustle +0.4
Defense +2.7
Raw total +3.4
Avg player in 2.9m -1.5
Impact +1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Logged two minutes of cardio at the end of the rotation without registering any meaningful stats. Showed a brief flash of hustle closing out to the corner, but otherwise vanished into the flow of the game. A completely neutral, low-leverage appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +41.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.3
Raw total +0.7
Avg player in 2.1m -1.1
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

Wasted his only offensive touch by forcing a bad perimeter jumper early in the shot clock. The veteran brought zero energy or hustle metrics to the table during his brief run. His negative impact stems directly from that single empty offensive possession.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +41.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Offense -0.9
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total -0.9
Avg player in 2.1m -1.1
Impact -2.0
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.1

Maximized his two minutes by executing a perfect and-one finish through traffic. That single high-leverage play spiked his box score impact significantly. Did exactly what was asked of him in a highly concentrated burst of action.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.2%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +41.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Offense +4.3
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +4.3
Avg player in 2.1m -1.2
Impact +3.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 39.2m
35
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.7

An absolute offensive masterclass that generated a massive +24.4 box impact through surgical pick-and-roll dissection. He consistently hunted favorable switches and punished drop coverage with lethal pull-up triples. The lower total impact relative to his box score suggests some defensive bleed, but his scoring efficiency carried the primary unit.

Shooting
FG 13/19 (68.4%)
3PT 6/9 (66.7%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.5%
USG% 26.7%
Net Rtg +6.9
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Offense +24.4
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.3
Raw total +30.6
Avg player in 39.2m -21.9
Impact +8.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Josh Hart 36.2m
21
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+17.5

Massive two-way impact driven by relentless energy on 50/50 balls and elite shot-making efficiency. His +11.9 hustle score reflects a constant presence in the passing lanes and on the offensive glass that broke the opponent's spirit. Punished the defense for leaving him open on the perimeter during crucial second-half stretches.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 91.8%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.2m
Offense +16.7
Hustle +11.9
Defense +9.1
Raw total +37.7
Avg player in 36.2m -20.2
Impact +17.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Mikal Bridges 36.1m
15
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+0.7

A perfectly neutral outing where solid point-of-attack defense was offset by inefficient isolation attempts. He generated decent looks but struggled to finish through contact in the mid-range. The defensive rotations were crisp, keeping his head above water despite the offensive inconsistency.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 53.6%
USG% 17.7%
Net Rtg +30.3
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.1m
Offense +12.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense +5.6
Raw total +20.7
Avg player in 36.1m -20.0
Impact +0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S OG Anunoby 36.0m
13
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.6

Defensive metrics remained elite, but his overall impact sank due to clunky perimeter execution. Settling for contested above-the-break threes short-circuited several offensive possessions. He locked down his primary assignment on the wing, yet the empty offensive trips dragged his net rating into the red.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 19.3%
Net Rtg +11.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Offense +3.2
Hustle +4.3
Defense +7.9
Raw total +15.4
Avg player in 36.0m -20.0
Impact -4.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 3
14
pts
16
reb
1
ast
Impact
+9.0

Overcame a sluggish shooting night by dominating the paint defensively and securing contested rebounds to limit second-chance opportunities. His +10.6 defensive impact anchored the interior, altering multiple drives at the rim. Even with his scoring volume down, his sheer gravity and rim protection kept the overall impact highly positive.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 51.3%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +37.1
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Offense +12.3
Hustle +3.3
Defense +10.6
Raw total +26.2
Avg player in 30.8m -17.2
Impact +9.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 31.2%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
12
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.9

Provided a quick scoring punch, but his tunnel vision and defensive lapses handed the momentum right back to the opposition. Bleeding value on the defensive end overshadowed his efficient shot-making. He repeatedly lost his man on back-door cuts during a pivotal second-quarter stretch.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +20.4
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Offense +6.6
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.6
Raw total +8.8
Avg player in 26.4m -14.7
Impact -5.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.6

Completely marginalized offensively as he failed to register a single field goal attempt during his stint. While he provided some minor value through screen-setting and rim deterrence, the lack of vertical spacing crippled the half-court offense. Opponents sagged off him entirely, clogging the driving lanes for the guards.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/8 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.4%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg -2.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Offense -0.2
Hustle +2.3
Defense +1.3
Raw total +3.4
Avg player in 16.0m -9.0
Impact -5.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.3

Maximized a short stint by playing mistake-free basketball and applying relentless ball pressure. His +3.0 defensive impact in just seven minutes highlights a sequence where he blew up a dribble hand-off to force a shot-clock violation. Kept the offense humming without demanding touches.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg +75.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Offense +2.5
Hustle +2.0
Defense +3.0
Raw total +7.5
Avg player in 7.5m -4.2
Impact +3.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.4

A ghost out there during his brief rotation minutes, failing to leave any positive imprint on the game. His inability to stretch the floor or generate secondary offense led to stagnant possessions. Was quickly pulled after missing a rotation that led to an easy baseline dunk.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg -16.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.0m
Offense -0.9
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.9
Raw total +0.4
Avg player in 7.0m -3.8
Impact -3.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.7

Barely saw the floor in a pure garbage-time appearance. Registered zero measurable impact across all categories during his 73 seconds of action. Just out there to run the clock down.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.2m -0.7
Impact -0.7
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Rushed a contested jumper during his brief cameo at the end of the bench. Showed a tiny bit of hustle tracking back on defense, but ultimately provided empty minutes. The negative box score stems entirely from that single wasted possession.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Offense -0.8
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.3
Raw total -0.3
Avg player in 1.2m -0.6
Impact -0.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.4

Gave up a quick bucket during his garbage-time minutes, resulting in a negative defensive grade. Failed to record any positive stats to offset the blown coverage. A completely forgettable closing minute.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.8
Raw total -0.8
Avg player in 1.2m -0.6
Impact -1.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.6

Made the absolute most of his closing minute by instantly drilling a spot-up three. That single high-value shot attempt drove his positive box score. Stayed disciplined on defense to close out the game cleanly.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Offense +3.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.3
Raw total +3.3
Avg player in 1.2m -0.7
Impact +2.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0