Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
CLE lead TOR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
TOR 2P — 3P —
CLE 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 172 attempts

TOR TOR Shot-making Δ

Barrett 9/25 -6.8
Shead 5/16 -4.9
Barnes 8/14 +2.8
Walter Hard 4/9 +3.3
Mamukelashvili 3/6 -0.8
Poeltl Open 4/5 +2.1
Murray-Boyles Open 3/5 +0.4
Lawson 1/4 -3.1
Battle 1/3 -0.6

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell Hard 9/20 -0.2
Allen Open 7/11 -0.1
Strus Hard 4/10 -1.4
Harden Hard 3/9 -1.8
Merrill Hard 4/8 +2.3
Tyson 3/8 -1.5
Mobley 5/7 +3.2
Schröder 1/7 -5.9
Wade 2/5 -0.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
TOR
CLE
38/87 Field Goals 38/85
43.7% Field Goal % 44.7%
8/28 3-Pointers 11/39
28.6% 3-Point % 28.2%
18/26 Free Throws 27/37
69.2% Free Throw % 73.0%
51.8% True Shooting % 56.3%
45 Total Rebounds 69
7 Offensive 20
26 Defensive 40
25 Assists 23
1.79 Assist/TO Ratio 1.35
14 Turnovers 16
10 Steals 8
4 Blocks 5
28 Fouls 23
50 Points in Paint 42
13 Fast Break Pts 13
18 Points off TOs 19
7 Second Chance Pts 23
19 Bench Points 34
10 Largest Lead 22
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jarrett Allen
22 PTS · 19 REB · 2 AST · 33.3 MIN
+27.23
2
Scottie Barnes
24 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST · 37.4 MIN
+17.26
3
James Harden
18 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 36.6 MIN
+14.99
4
Max Strus
12 PTS · 8 REB · 5 AST · 30.8 MIN
+12.91
5
RJ Barrett
23 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 43.0 MIN
+12.01
6
Ja'Kobe Walter
13 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 37.6 MIN
+10.22
7
Donovan Mitchell
22 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 35.2 MIN
+9.92
8
Collin Murray-Boyles
8 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 23.7 MIN
+9.41
9
Sam Merrill
13 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 23.2 MIN
+9.37
10
Jaylon Tyson
7 PTS · 9 REB · 4 AST · 18.8 MIN
+8.03
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:01 CLE shot clock Team TURNOVER 102–114
Q4 0:25 R. Barrett driving Layup (23 PTS) 102–114
Q4 0:31 J. Walter flagrant Free Throw 2 of 2 (13 PTS) 100–114
Q4 0:31 J. Walter flagrant Free Throw 1 of 2 (12 PTS) 99–114
Q4 0:31 D. Mitchell double technical FOUL (1 Tech) 98–114
Q4 0:31 R. Barrett double technical FOUL (1 Tech) 98–114
Q4 0:31 J. Allen flagrant-type-1 personal FOUL (2 PF) (Walter 2 FT) 98–114
Q4 0:31 J. Walter STEAL (3 STL) 98–114
Q4 0:31 J. Allen lost ball TURNOVER (3 TO) 98–114
Q4 0:33 J. Allen REBOUND (Off:8 Def:11) 98–114
Q4 0:35 MISS R. Barrett 10' driving floating Shot 98–114
Q4 0:47 D. Mitchell personal FOUL (3 PF) 98–114
Q4 0:47 S. Barnes REBOUND (Off:1 Def:8) 98–114
Q4 0:48 S. Barnes BLOCK (1 BLK) 98–114
Q4 0:48 MISS D. Mitchell 25' 3PT - blocked 98–114

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S James Harden 36.6m
18
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.1

Harden compensated for a miserable shooting night (33% FG) by relentlessly attacking the rim, converting 11-of-13 free throws to salvage a +11.4 offensive credit. Surprisingly, his biggest impact came defensively, where he racked up 7 deflections and 3 steals (↑) while holding his matchup to just 38% shooting to earn a +7.2 defense credit.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 11/13 (84.6%)
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +8.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Scoring +12.8
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.8
Defense +4.0
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
22
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.6

Mitchell's scoring volume drove his +12.9 offensive credit, but his perimeter stroke abandoned him as he clanked 7 of his 9 three-point attempts. His playmaking was virtually non-existent (1 assist, ↓), and he struggled to contain his matchup defensively, allowing 56% shooting.

Shooting
FG 9/20 (45.0%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.7%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg +8.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +5.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jarrett Allen 33.3m
22
pts
19
reb
2
ast
Impact
+27.7

Allen absolutely dominated the paint, pairing highly efficient scoring (7-of-11 FG) with a massive 19 rebounds (↑) to fuel a +22.1 offensive credit. He was equally terrifying on the other end, racking up 3 blocks (↑) and 8 contests to anchor a dominant +10.6 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 0/0
FT 8/14 (57.1%)
Advanced
TS% 64.1%
USG% 23.9%
Net Rtg +22.4
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Scoring +15.5
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +21.2
Defense +4.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 3
S Evan Mobley 27.4m
13
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.7

Mobley was highly efficient when he looked for his shot (71% FG), but his offensive flow was disrupted by an uncharacteristic 4 turnovers (↑). He remained a strong deterrent inside with 8 shot contests, holding his primary matchup to a respectable 47% shooting on 15 attempts to anchor a +0.7 defense credit.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.2%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -5.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +8.9
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -8.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Dean Wade 21.1m
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.2

Wade operated as a low-usage connector, providing steady effort with 3 deflections and 3 contests to generate a +2.5 hustle credit. However, his defensive impact was slightly undermined by allowing his primary matchup to convert 4-of-7 field goals (57%).

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.1m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Max Strus 30.8m
12
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+7.2

Strus put on an absolute defensive masterclass, drawing 2 charges and smothering his primary matchup into a catastrophic 1-of-10 shooting performance. This relentless two-way effort yielded a massive +9.8 hustle credit, more than making up for his icy 2-of-8 shooting from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.1%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +28.9
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +10.2
Defense +4.6
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 10.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
Sam Merrill 23.2m
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.0

Merrill provided a lethal perimeter spark off the bench, knocking down 3-of-7 from deep to power a +12.2 offensive credit without committing a single turnover. He also held his own defensively, limiting his primary matchup to just 36% shooting despite a negative overall defensive credit (-1.8).

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.2%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +29.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +9.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense -3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaylon Tyson 18.8m
7
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.1

Tyson made his presence felt on the glass, pulling down an impressive 9 rebounds (↑) to help secure extra possessions. While his scoring was inefficient (38% FG), his clean decision-making (4 assists, 0 turnovers) earned him a solid +7.4 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 43.8%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg +49.8
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +8.5
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.0

Schröder endured a brutal offensive outing, managing just 2 points on a dismal 1-of-7 shooting performance that resulted in a negative (-2.4) offensive credit. His playmaking was equally absent, as he recorded just a single assist (↓) during his 13 minutes on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 14.3%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg -39.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring -2.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
TOR Toronto Raptors
S RJ Barrett 43.0m
23
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+4.5

Barrett's aggressive offensive creation (+7.6) was severely undercut by inefficient volume shooting, as he needed 25 attempts to reach his 23 points (36% FG). Despite generating 3 steals (↑), his defensive impact was compromised by allowing his primary matchup to shoot a blistering 67% (8-of-12).

Shooting
FG 9/25 (36.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.3%
USG% 30.3%
Net Rtg -4.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.0m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Ja'Kobe Walter 37.6m
13
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.6

Walter's performance was defined by relentless off-ball activity, racking up 4 deflections and drawing a charge to fuel a robust +6.5 hustle credit. He complemented this defensive energy (+6.5 defense credit) by knocking down 3-of-7 from beyond the arc, proving to be a disruptive two-way presence despite a quiet rebounding night.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 63.0%
USG% 12.6%
Net Rtg -19.5
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.6m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
S Scottie Barnes 37.4m
24
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+13.5

A massive +19.9 offensive credit highlights Barnes's highly efficient scoring (8-of-14 FG) and ability to dictate the flow of the game. He paired this offensive engine role with stifling point-of-attack defense, holding his primary matchup to just 36% shooting (4-of-11) while logging 5 contests.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.3%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.4m
Scoring +20.3
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +8.5
Defense -1.7
Turnovers -8.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Jamal Shead 35.5m
14
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
-0.6

Shead's playmaking was a bright spot (+8.6 offensive credit) as he dished out an above-average 7 assists while committing just a single turnover. However, his scoring volume was highly inefficient, requiring 16 shot attempts to generate 14 points (31% FG) and dragging down his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 5/16 (31.2%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 40.4%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg -16.0
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.5m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jakob Poeltl 22.4m
9
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.0

Poeltl provided highly efficient interior finishing (4-of-5 FG) but struggled to anchor the paint defensively, allowing his matchup to shoot 62% from the floor. However, his relentless motor was evident in the hustle metrics, where he tallied 10 shot contests and 3 screen assists to generate a +3.3 hustle credit.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg +19.1
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +6.0
Defense -1.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
8
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.7

Despite a sharp drop in scoring volume (8 points, ↓), Murray-Boyles remained highly efficient from the floor (3-of-5 FG) to secure a +6.5 offensive credit. His defensive metrics were a mixed bag, as he generated 2 steals (↑) and 6 contests but allowed his primary matchup to shoot a blistering 67%.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 63.3%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -43.2
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.7m
Scoring +6.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
A.J. Lawson 16.0m
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.4

Lawson's offensive game was virtually non-existent (2 points on 25% shooting), but he salvaged his minutes through sheer effort to earn a +4.8 hustle credit. He proved to be a genuine nuisance on the defensive end, logging 4 contests, drawing a charge, and smothering his matchup into 1-of-5 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -6.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.0

Battle played a quiet but highly effective role as a perimeter stopper, completely blanketing his primary matchup to the tune of 0-for-7 shooting. Offensively, he was a near-ghost during his 13 minutes, managing just 3 points on three field goal attempts while generating a modest +1.8 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.7%
Net Rtg -29.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.0

Mamukelashvili's brief 8-minute stint was defined by absolute statistical invisibility outside of his scoring, failing to record a single rebound, assist, steal, or block. While he converted half of his field goals (3-of-6), his inability to stretch the floor (0-of-2 from deep) or impact the glass (↓ 0 rebounds) limited his overall utility.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.6%
USG% 38.9%
Net Rtg -35.6
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.9m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Temple logged just 25 seconds of garbage-time cardio, failing to register a single box score or hustle statistic. His fleeting appearance had zero measurable impact on the game's outcome, resulting in a flat +0.0 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.4m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Relegated to the absolute end of the bench, Mogbo saw only 25 seconds of action. He predictably recorded no stats across the board during this microscopic stint, leaving his component credits entirely neutral.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.4m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Dick's night consisted entirely of a 25-second cameo where he simply ran out the clock. He generated zero statistical production in any category, completely neutralizing his impact footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.4m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Jackson-Davis was limited to just 25 seconds of floor time, serving as a human victory cigar. He produced a completely empty statistical line across his brief appearance, yielding a +0.0 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.4m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0