CLE

2025-26 Season

TYRESE PROCTOR

Cleveland Cavaliers | Guard | 6-4
Tyrese Proctor
4.9 PPG
1.1 RPG
1.3 APG
10.3 MPG
-0.9 Impact

Proctor produces at an average rate for a 10-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.9
Scoring +2.8
Points 4.9 PPG × +1.00 = +4.9
Missed 2PT 0.8/g × -0.78 = -0.6
Missed 3PT 1.6/g × -0.87 = -1.4
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +1.1
Assists 1.3/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 0.3/g × +1.26 = +0.4
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense -0.8
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.0/g × +0.90 = +0.0
Def. Rebounds 0.8/g × +0.30 = +0.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.3
Contested Shots 0.8/g × +0.20 = +0.2
Deflections 1.1/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +3.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −4.1
Net Impact
-0.9
56th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 22th
6.2 PPG
Efficiency 46th
54.5% TS
Playmaking 27th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 7th
1.3 RPG
Rim Protection 43th
0.11/min
Hustle 87th
0.14/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 48th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tyrese Proctor's early-season stretch was a frustrating slump defined by erratic shot selection, defensive liabilities, and a failure to establish a consistent rhythm off the bench. Even when he managed to generate raw counting stats, his inefficiency often dragged down the entire unit. During 11/12 vs MIA, Proctor tallied 12 points, but his -4.7 impact score exposed the hidden costs of his poor shot selection and an inability to finish through contact. His defensive shortcomings were equally punishing. On 01/19 vs OKC, a complete inability to contain dribble penetration at the point of attack yielded a disastrous -12.3 impact score. He did offer fleeting glimpses of firepower when opponents gave him space, catching fire on 11/07 vs WAS to score 17 points and post a +3.5 impact mark by punishing under-screens with deep triples. Ultimately, those rare outbursts simply could not offset the overwhelming negative value of his rushed mechanics and defensive lapses.

This stretch of the season was defined by extreme volatility, as Tyrese Proctor wildly toggled between serving as a hyper-efficient bench sparkplug and a highly erratic shot-chucker. His first appearance set a deceiving tone on 12/19 vs CHI, where a seemingly productive 16-point outing actually yielded a -1.9 impact score because his forced perimeter attempts completely disrupted the offensive flow. He eventually found a much better rhythm by letting the game come to him. During a brilliant cameo on 01/16 vs PHI, Proctor punished defensive closeouts with 13 points in 11 minutes, driving a stellar +11.0 impact score. Unfortunately, his worst habits frequently resurfaced. A brutal outing on 01/30 vs PHX highlighted this inconsistency, as an abysmal 1-for-5 shooting performance derailed his offensive rhythm and cratered his impact to a dismal -10.3. When he attacks decisively off the catch, he is an invaluable weapon. When he rushes his execution early in the shot clock, he becomes an active detriment on the floor.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Proctor's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 30% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Proctor doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -1.7, second-half: -0.1. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 67 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

G. Mathews 19.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 1
G. Dick 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 9
J. Bouyea 18.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
C. White 18.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Jenkins 15.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
I. Quickley 14.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
E. Dëmin 13.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
T. Kolek 13.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
D. Bane 12.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 3
I. Okoro 12.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.5
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Shead 22.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. White 21.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Dick 21.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Mathews 19.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
J. Bouyea 19.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 6
D. Jenkins 16.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
R. Sheppard 14.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Kolek 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Quickley 14.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 4
Q. Grimes 13.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

46
Games
4.9
PPG
1.1
RPG
1.3
APG
0.4
SPG
0.0
BPG
40.3
FG%
34.2
3P%
88.9
FT%
10.3
MPG

GAME LOG

46 games played