CLE

2025-26 Season

TYRESE PROCTOR

Cleveland Cavaliers | Guard | 6-4
Tyrese Proctor
5.3PPG
1.2RPG
1.4APG
10.5MPG
-5.7 Impact

Proctor produces at an poor rate for a 10-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.7
Scoring +4.7
Points Scored 5.3 PPG = +5.3
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.3
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 1.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.9
Defense +0.4
Steals 0.5/g = +1.1
Blocks 0.0/g = +0.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -0.7
Hustle & Effort +0.8
Rebounds 1.2 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.2
Contested Shots 0.7/g = +0.1
Deflections 1.0/g = +0.7
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +4.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.2
Net Impact
-5.7
17th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 28th
6.9 PPG
Efficiency 58th
55.3% TS
Playmaking 29th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 8th
1.6 RPG
Defense 41th
+6.8/g
Hustle 51th
+9.1/g
Creation 44th
+2.55/g
Shot Making 38th
+5.76/g
TO Discipline 27th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tyrese Proctor's early-season run off the bench was defined by brutal offensive inconsistency and a desperate search for shooting rhythm. When given extended minutes on 11/13 vs MIA, he managed 12 points but posted a -5.6 impact score because his dreadful 4-for-15 shot selection actively derailed the offense. The lone bright spot came earlier on 11/08 vs WAS. He caught fire for 17 points on 5-for-6 shooting from deep, generating a massive +11.2 impact score by spacing the floor and punishing late defensive rotations. Those moments of brilliance were frustratingly rare. Reality quickly set back in during outings like the 11/25 vs TOR matchup. Despite logging 20 minutes, his erratic 2-for-9 shooting and empty 0-for-5 mark from beyond the arc resulted in a -5.0 impact score, highlighting the steep cost of a guard who wastes valuable possessions.

Tyrese Proctor spent this miserable winter stretch chained to the deep bench, fighting through a brutal slump defined by erratic minutes and empty production. His disastrous outing on 12/24 vs NOP perfectly captured his struggles. Despite playing just eight minutes, he forced five terrible shots and missed them all. This selfish shot selection dragged him down to a catastrophic -18.6 Impact score. The lone bright spot came during a rare spot start on 12/20 vs CHI. Given 27 minutes to find a rhythm, Proctor poured in 16 points and grabbed six rebounds, generating a +4.9 Impact score driven by relentless hustle and engaged perimeter defense. He managed another quick offensive burst on 01/17 vs PHI, dropping 13 points in 11 minutes for a +7.5 Impact score fueled by hyper-efficient shooting. Ultimately, those fleeting moments of competence were swallowed whole by a frustrating sea of single-digit minutes.

This stretch defined Tyrese Proctor as a struggling benchwarmer who endured months of erratic play before a sudden, explosive awakening in the final week of the season. For most of the winter, his on-court value was abysmal. Look at his dreadful -11.5 Impact score on 01/30 vs PHX, where poor shot selection completely negated his five assists. Even when he managed to reach double digits on 04/06 vs MEM with 10 points, he still posted a -1.7 Impact because his brutal 2-for-8 shooting and forced perimeter looks stalled the entire offensive flow. Night after night, Proctor dragged down lineups with empty cardio and offensive hesitation. Yet everything finally clicked on 04/12 vs WAS. Given a massive 35 minutes of run, he erupted for 22 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists, earning a +5.0 Impact by crashing the glass relentlessly and orchestrating the half-court offense with absolute authority.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Proctor has posted negative impact in 79% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 35% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Proctor doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 67 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

G. Mathews 19.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 1
G. Dick 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 9
J. Bouyea 18.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
C. White 18.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Jenkins 15.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
I. Quickley 14.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
E. Dëmin 13.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
T. Kolek 13.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
D. Bane 12.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 3
I. Okoro 12.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.5
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Shead 22.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. White 21.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Dick 21.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Mathews 19.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
J. Bouyea 19.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 6
D. Jenkins 16.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
R. Sheppard 14.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Kolek 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Quickley 14.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 4
Q. Grimes 13.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

52
Games
5.3
PPG
1.2
RPG
1.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
41.3
FG%
35.1
3P%
89.4
FT%
10.5
MPG

GAME LOG

52 games played