January 28, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
NYK
2P —
3P —
TOR
2P —
3P —
NYK
TOR
NYK
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Toronto Raptors
Surgical precision from the midrange and excellent defensive engagement drove a stellar +14.9 net rating. Consistently punishing switches by shooting over smaller defenders yielded highly efficient offense. Active hands and great positional awareness (+8.3 Def) proved he was fully locked in on both ends of the floor.
A versatile, two-way effort was highlighted by excellent defensive rebounding and perimeter switchability (+6.1 Def). Acting as the primary connective tissue in transition allowed him to push the pace and dictate tempo. While half-court efficiency was merely average, a relentless motor on loose balls (+4.4 hustle) kept the overall impact firmly positive.
Pounding the air out of the ball and settling for contested pull-ups severely damaged the team's offensive flow. An inability to break down the primary defender led to late-clock grenades and a disastrous -14.2 overall rating. The offense completely stagnated during his shifts, entirely overshadowing a few decent hustle plays.
Exceptional defensive positioning (+7.0 Def) was completely undermined by a stark refusal to engage offensively. Despite shooting well historically, passing up open looks allowed his defender to roam as a free safety. This reluctance to attack the rim stalled out multiple half-court sets, dragging his net impact into the red.
Brutal finishing around the rim threatened to tank his value, but sheer aggression salvaged his overall rating. Constantly attacking the paint to draw contact compensated for a barrage of clanked jumpers. A willingness to take on physical defensive assignments (+2.3 Def) kept his impact marginally positive despite the shooting woes.
Outstanding weak-side rim protection (+7.3 Def) wasn't quite enough to overcome disjointed offensive spacing. Frequently clogging the driving lanes disrupted the team's slashing game and led to clunky possessions. Despite high-energy closeouts (+3.1 hustle), this awkward offensive fit yielded a slightly negative net result.
Elite point-of-attack harassment (+5.2 Def) and absolute chaos generation (+7.8 hustle) defined his minutes, yet his rating still slipped negative. This defensive brilliance was undone by an inability to organize the offense or hit open spot-up looks. Opponents simply ignored him on the perimeter, completely ruining the team's half-court spacing.
A catastrophic shooting performance completely cratered his impact score, resulting in a brutal -14.1 rating. Repeatedly forcing out-of-rhythm perimeter shots gifted the opponent long rebounds and easy transition opportunities. Compounding these offensive zeroes, he was frequently blown by on the perimeter (-1.1 Def).
Smart off-ball movement and drawing fouls compensated for a poor shooting night from the floor. Constant motion forced defensive rotations, opening up driving lanes for his teammates and boosting his box impact (+6.2). Surprisingly stout positional defense (+3.8 Def) ensured he remained a solid net positive.
Barely registered during a brief cameo, offering zero offensive gravity to stretch the floor. A lack of foot speed was briefly exposed on a defensive switch, leading to a minor negative rating (-1.5). He essentially existed as a placeholder while the primary rotation caught its breath.
A blown assignment on an offensive set resulted in a rushed, missed shot that hurt his box impact. However, good instincts on the other end allowed him to make a solid defensive rotation (+2.3 Def) to contest a shot at the rim. These brief minutes were a mixed bag of rookie mistakes and raw defensive potential.
Failed to make any tangible impact during his short stint on the floor. Getting caught ball-watching led to a backdoor cut that dinged his defensive metrics (-0.8). The complete absence of hustle plays or offensive involvement resulted in a quiet negative shift.
Completely blended into the background during his extremely brief rotation minutes. Generating absolutely zero statistical impact across box, hustle, or defensive metrics left him invisible. The slight negative rating stems purely from the team losing the micro-possession battle while he was on the floor.
New York Knicks
An absolute masterclass in shotmaking efficiency drove a towering +27.3 box impact. Ruthlessly exploiting drop coverage in the pick-and-roll allowed him to find his spots with zero hesitation. This explosive offensive surge completely overwhelmed the opposing perimeter defenders and masked any minor rotational lapses.
Phenomenal shot selection from the perimeter fueled a highly efficient offensive outing that shattered his recent scoring baseline. Relentless energy in transition and on loose balls (+6.0 hustle) consistently extended possessions and generated secondary scoring opportunities. Hitting timely catch-and-shoot daggers from the corner broke the defense's back during crucial stretches.
A severe drop-off in scoring efficiency and poor interior touch dragged his overall impact into the negative despite heroic glass-cleaning. Settling for heavily contested looks in the paint rather than passing out of double teams severely limited the offense. Only a stout defensive presence (+8.6 Def) and ending possessions on the boards kept his rating from cratering entirely.
Elite two-way execution drove a massive +26.2 overall rating, anchored by a suffocating +15.6 defensive impact. He consistently punished defensive mismatches to generate high-quality looks, spiking his scoring efficiency well above his recent baseline. His relentless point-of-attack pressure completely disrupted the opponent's offensive flow.
Forcing tough, contested floaters in traffic tanked his offensive value and led to a steep -9.0 overall rating. The opponent's length clearly bothered his rhythm, resulting in empty possessions and a sharp decline from his usual offensive baseline. He managed to salvage a tiny bit of value through active hands and loose-ball recoveries (+5.5 hustle).
Chucking low-percentage looks from deep derailed offensive momentum and drove a negative overall rating. He repeatedly forced heavily contested catch-and-shoot attempts early in the shot clock instead of swinging the ball. A decent effort navigating screens on defense wasn't enough to offset the wasted offensive possessions.
Despite excellent facilitation, defensive liabilities and a lack of scoring gravity severely punished his overall impact (-8.1). Opposing guards actively targeted him in isolation, bleeding points on the other end of the floor. His reluctance to look for his own shot allowed defenders to sag off and clog passing lanes.
Provided a brief but stable interior presence during his limited rotation minutes. Setting bruising screens and holding his ground in the post generated a slightly positive defensive impact (+1.5). He played strictly within his role, avoiding mistakes and anchoring the paint effectively while the starters rested.
Stellar weak-side rim protection and physical post defense (+6.7 Def) anchored a highly productive shift. Even with his scoring output dropping significantly from his recent baseline, his defensive rotations were flawless. Consistently blowing up pick-and-roll actions by hedging hard and recovering quickly defined his positive impact.
Completely invisible on the offensive end, failing to generate any gravity or spacing during his stint. This offensive passivity forced the unit to essentially play four-on-five in the halfcourt. A couple of timely closeouts and deflections (+1.7 hustle) prevented his rating from slipping further.
Forcing isolation plays against set defenses resulted in empty trips and a quick hook. Highly questionable shot selection completely halted ball movement and stalled the second unit's rhythm. This total lack of offensive production negated any marginal hustle contributions he made.
