UTA

2025-26 Season

ACE BAILEY

Utah Jazz | Forward | 6-9
Ace Bailey
13.6 PPG
4.1 RPG
1.8 APG
27.5 MPG
-2.7 Impact

Bailey produces at an below average rate for a 28-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.7
Scoring +7.7
Points 13.6 PPG × +1.00 = +13.6
Missed 2PT 3.2/g × -0.78 = -2.5
Missed 3PT 3.6/g × -0.87 = -3.1
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.2
Assists 1.8/g × +0.50 = +0.9
Off. Rebounds 1.0/g × +1.26 = +1.3
Turnovers -2.7
Turnovers 1.4/g × -1.95 = -2.7
Defense +1.4
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.7/g × +0.90 = +0.6
Def. Rebounds 3.1/g × +0.30 = +0.9
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.4
Contested Shots 4.7/g × +0.20 = +0.9
Deflections 1.5/g × +0.65 = +1.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +11.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −13.7
Net Impact
-2.7
13th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 71th
13.6 PPG
Efficiency 23th
52.3% TS
Playmaking 56th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 51th
4.1 RPG
Rim Protection 23th
0.10/min
Hustle 21th
0.08/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 39th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Ace Bailey's opening stretch was defined by a jarring mid-November role change that rescued him from an abysmal early slump. Coming off the bench to start the year, he looked completely lost. He bottomed out on 10/22 vs LAC with an abysmal -11.9 impact score, scoring just two points because he halted ball movement and stubbornly drove into crowded paint areas. Moving into the starting lineup completely flipped his approach. On 11/21 vs OKC, he posted a massive +8.8 impact score by slashing to the rim with purpose and finishing through contact for 15 efficient points. However, his newfound scoring punch as a starter occasionally carried hidden costs. During his start on 11/30 vs HOU, he poured in 19 points, yet suffered a -4.3 impact score because deep structural flaws completely undermined his brilliant perimeter shot-making. He possesses undeniable talent, but he must learn to hunt his offense without sabotaging the larger system.

A maddening slump driven by catastrophic shot selection and offensive tunnel vision plagued Ace Bailey throughout this stretch. Even when his raw scoring totals looked respectable, hidden costs severely damaged his team. Look at the 01/17 vs DAL matchup. He tallied 18 points and 8 rebounds, yet posted a disastrous -12.2 impact score because live-ball turnovers and severe defensive lapses constantly fueled the opposition. He repeated this hollow production on 01/20 vs MIN, logging 20 points but dragging his impact down to -4.0 by forcing up a heavy volume of inefficient jumpers. Conversely, Bailey occasionally found ways to contribute without commanding the ball. Despite scoring just 4 points on 01/12 vs CLE, he scratched out a +1.3 impact by executing timely weak-side rotations and disciplined defensive closeouts. To become a winning player, he must stop letting selfish perimeter decisions sabotage his actual utility.

A maddening lack of shot discipline defined this stretch, reducing a highly capable scorer into a volatile possession-killer. He frequently sabotaged his own box score production with selfish decisions. During the 02/05 vs ATL matchup, a brutal diet of contested mid-range pull-ups resulted in a -3.6 impact score despite him tallying 20 points. He repeated this script on 03/11 vs NYK. Hunting his own shot early in the clock yielded 21 points, but the hidden cost of disrupting the team's offensive flow dragged him down to a -3.9 impact rating. Yet, when he occasionally stopped forcing the issue, his peripheral value skyrocketed. Look at his 03/13 vs POR appearance, where he scored just 8 points in seven minutes but posted a massive +11.8 impact score by providing elite defensive value that completely flipped the game's momentum. If he ever stops settling for contested jumpers, he might actually become a consistently winning player.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Bailey's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~8 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 48% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Bailey consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 68 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Smith Jr. 59.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Johnson 56.4 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 10
K. Durant 55.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 11
D. Bane 48.7 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
A. Edwards 42.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
J. Champagnie 41.2 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 14
L. James 38.9 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
J. Grant 38.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
J. Robinson-Earl 37.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
D. DiVincenzo 36.7 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Smith Jr. 73.0 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 17
M. Moody 54.9 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.38
PTS 21
R. Hachimura 54.7 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 13
J. McDaniels 48.0 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 15
Z. Risacher 39.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Robinson-Earl 37.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 10
J. Randle 36.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 11
J. Grant 35.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
D. Bane 34.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 15
A. Thompson 34.9 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 14

SEASON STATS

69
Games
13.6
PPG
4.1
RPG
1.8
APG
0.8
SPG
0.7
BPG
44.4
FG%
34.8
3P%
76.7
FT%
27.5
MPG

GAME LOG

69 games played