2025-26 Season
IMMANUEL QUICKLEY
2025-26 Season
IMMANUEL QUICKLEY
Quickley produces at an elite rate for a 32-minute workload.
Quickley produces at an elite rate for a 32-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 14 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Immanuel Quickley’s first stretch of the season was defined by a chaotic evolution from an erratic shooter into a complete, two-way floor general. Early on, he learned to salvage rough shooting nights with sheer effort, perfectly captured on 10/26 vs DAL. He bricked his way to 14 points on a dismal 5-for-16 from the floor, yet still managed a +9.6 Impact because his relentless hustle and perimeter defense kept the team afloat. Just three days later on 10/29 vs HOU, the inverse occurred. Despite hitting four triples and handing out seven assists, Quickley posted a -2.0 Impact. Hidden costs like defensive breakdowns and sloppy decisions entirely erased his offensive production. Fortunately, the game eventually slowed down for him, leading to a brilliant clinic on 11/12 vs BKN. He poured in 24 points and grabbed eight rebounds on highly efficient 10-of-17 shooting, generating a massive +29.0 Impact to establish himself as a truly dangerous offensive engine.
Immanuel Quickley’s midseason run was defined by extreme offensive volatility, oscillating between brutal shooting slumps and absolute scoring masterclasses. Even when his jumper abandoned him, he found ways to orchestrate the offense. He managed a +0.8 Impact on 12/19 vs MIL despite scoring just nine points because he relentlessly distributed the ball for 10 assists and crashed the glass for six rebounds. Still, his erratic shot selection occasionally punished the lineup. During a disastrous outing on 12/30 vs ORL, Quickley forced up terrible looks to finish 2-for-12 from the floor, dragging his team down with a miserable -10.5 Impact. Those cold spells rarely lasted. He reached his absolute zenith on 01/21 vs GSW, erupting for 40 points and 10 assists on a near-flawless 11-of-13 shooting night. By pairing lethal 7-of-8 perimeter sniping with elite playmaking, he generated a staggering +39.4 Impact and completely dismantled the defense.
This mid-season stretch was defined by erratic shooting that forced Immanuel Quickley to evolve from a pure scorer into a gritty, high-volume facilitator. He reached his absolute offensive ceiling on 02/22 vs MIL, erupting for 32 points and nine assists on blistering 11-for-19 shooting to generate a massive +30.6 impact score. That dominant rating stemmed directly from his lethal perimeter shot-making and his ability to cleanly dissect the defense as a lead ball-handler. When his jumper abandoned him, he simply found alternative ways to keep his team afloat. Despite a miserable 4-for-14 shooting night on 03/03 vs NYK, Quickley still scraped out a +2.5 impact score by pivoting to a traditional point guard role and dishing out 12 assists to generate non-scoring value. Occasionally, the offensive futility was too heavy to mask with passing. His absolute floor arrived on 03/15 vs DET, where a disastrous 1-for-12 shooting performance and forced, contested attempts dragged him down to a -3.3 impact score.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Very consistent. Quickley posts positive impact in 84% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~7 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 49% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. Quickley consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +8.0, second-half: +11.3. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 16 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 47 days ago
Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
70 games played
