CHA

2025-26 Season

LIAM MCNEELEY

Charlotte Hornets | Forward | 6-7
Liam McNeeley
4.2PPG
2.3RPG
0.8APG
11.7MPG
-5.4 Impact

McNeeley produces at an poor rate for a 12-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.4
Scoring +3.9
Points Scored 4.2 PPG = +4.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.0
Creation +0.3
Assists & Self-Creation 0.8 AST/g + self-creation = +0.3
Turnovers -1.0
Turnovers 0.4/g (live + dead blend) = -1.0
Defense -0.6
Steals 0.2/g = +0.5
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.2
Hustle & Effort +1.6
Rebounds 2.3 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.9
Contested Shots 1.9/g = +0.4
Deflections 0.4/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +4.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.6
Net Impact
-5.4
13th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 13th
4.7 PPG
Efficiency 41th
55.2% TS
Playmaking 11th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 15th
2.6 RPG
Defense 3th
+2.4/g
Hustle 15th
+7.6/g
Creation 8th
+1.20/g
Shot Making 21th
+3.79/g
TO Discipline 78th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Liam McNeeley’s first eleven games of the 2025-26 season were defined by a brutal, unrelenting adjustment to the speed of professional basketball. His lone bright spot arrived on 10/30 vs ORL. He posted a +0.6 Impact score by acting as a willing connector, supplementing his six points with four assists and three rebounds in just 14 minutes. That fleeting moment of competence vanished completely by 11/01 vs MIN. He registered a ghastly -15.4 Impact score that night, dragging the second unit down with an empty stat line of zero points, zero assists, and 0-for-3 shooting. Even when McNeeley managed to find the bottom of the net, the underlying costs were steep. Look at his outing on 11/23 vs ATL, where he scored six points but still bled value to the tune of a -12.5 Impact score. He needed six shot attempts just to get those points, and his glaring defensive lapses made him an absolute liability on the floor.

Liam McNeeley’s mid-season stretch was defined by erratic bench minutes and a frustrating inability to string together positive shifts. Even when he found the bottom of the net, the underlying metrics often painted a bleak picture. During the 12/04 vs NYK matchup, he scored 10 points in 21 minutes, but a -3.0 impact score revealed the hidden costs of his inefficient 3-for-8 shooting and porous perimeter defense. He briefly flipped the script on 12/07 vs DEN. Pouring in 13 points on blistering 4-of-5 shooting from beyond the arc, McNeeley posted a stellar +7.7 impact by taking exactly what the defense gave him and avoiding costly turnovers. Unfortunately, that rhythm vanished entirely by the end of the month. In a brutal 12/31 vs GSW outing, he managed zero points in 11 minutes, suffering a -10.2 impact because he simply floated on the wing without generating any playmaking or defensive resistance to offset his cold hand.

Liam McNeeley spent this ten-game stretch buried at the end of the bench, struggling to find any sort of rhythm in sporadic minutes. When he did get extended run, his offensive limitations were glaring. Take the game on 01/04 vs CHI, where he logged 13 minutes but posted a disastrous -11.6 Impact score due to a completely scoreless, 0-for-3 shooting performance that stalled the offense. Even when given a stretch-high 21 minutes on 01/08 vs TOR, poor perimeter shot selection led to an ugly 1-for-4 shooting night and a -7.5 Impact, dragging the team down despite his seven total points. He finally flipped the script late in the season on 03/29 vs BOS. In just 11 minutes of action, McNeeley erupted for a +10.8 Impact score. He earned that massive positive mark by maximizing his touches, scoring 10 highly efficient points on just three field goal attempts while aggressively crashing the glass for six rebounds.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. McNeeley has posted negative impact in 88% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 33% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -6.3, second-half: -4.6. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 32 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

G. Dick 30.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
J. Brunson 21.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Larsson 14.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Fontecchio 14.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 5
K. Huerter 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Johnson 14.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 4
I. Quickley 13.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Kolek 11.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Krejčí 10.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 3
G. Trent Jr. 9.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

G. Dick 23.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
S. Fontecchio 20.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.3
PTS 6
J. Walter 16.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Larsson 16.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 5
J. Clarkson 14.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 4
A. Bailey 13.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
J. Hart 12.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.57
PTS 7
H. Jones 12.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Johnson 12.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Quickley 11.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

32
Games
4.2
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.8
APG
0.2
SPG
0.1
BPG
40.6
FG%
40.0
3P%
82.1
FT%
11.7
MPG

GAME LOG

32 games played