GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

TOR Toronto Raptors
S RJ Barrett 37.2m
20
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.7

Excellent shot selection yielded tremendous scoring efficiency, yet his minutes somehow resulted in a net negative. The damage was likely done in transition, where defensive miscommunications undermined his stellar half-court execution.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.0%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -19.2
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.2m
Offense +13.3
Hustle +1.6
Defense +3.2
Raw total +18.1
Avg player in 37.2m -18.8
Impact -0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 81.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Brandon Ingram 36.6m
31
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+10.4

An absolute masterclass in shot creation fueled a dominant overall rating. He relentlessly punished mismatches in isolation, breaking out of a recent scoring lull to carry the offensive load.

Shooting
FG 11/20 (55.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 67.2%
USG% 30.4%
Net Rtg -8.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Offense +20.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense +5.3
Raw total +29.0
Avg player in 36.6m -18.6
Impact +10.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Scottie Barnes 35.6m
14
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.1

Defensive versatility was the calling card here, as he consistently blew up actions both on and off the ball. He sacrificed offensive volume to focus on connective passing and high-leverage weakside rotations.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.8%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -4.5
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Offense +8.7
Hustle +3.6
Defense +8.8
Raw total +21.1
Avg player in 35.6m -18.0
Impact +3.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 38.1%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 3
13
pts
3
reb
12
ast
Impact
-1.4

Perimeter shot-hunting went cold, dragging down his offensive value through sheer inefficiency. He managed to salvage some utility via active hands on defense, but the bricked jumpers ultimately stalled out crucial possessions.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.7%
USG% 24.3%
Net Rtg -13.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Offense +6.9
Hustle +3.5
Defense +4.7
Raw total +15.1
Avg player in 32.8m -16.5
Impact -1.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jakob Poeltl 29.9m
9
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.7

A passive approach offensively limited his usual interior gravity, causing his overall impact to slip into the negative. While he maintained his standard efficiency, the lack of aggressive rim-running allowed the defense to key in on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.9%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg -19.0
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Offense +8.5
Hustle +2.7
Defense +2.3
Raw total +13.5
Avg player in 29.9m -15.2
Impact -1.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Jamal Shead 24.1m
4
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.2

Offensive invisibility severely handicapped the second unit, resulting in a disastrous overall swing. He generated a few extra possessions through sheer hustle, but it wasn't nearly enough to offset the spacing issues he created.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -20.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Offense -0.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.1
Raw total +3.0
Avg player in 24.1m -12.2
Impact -9.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.7

Firing blanks from the perimeter rendered him an offensive zero, severely cramping the floor for his teammates. He fought hard on the defensive end to stay relevant, but the lack of a scoring threat was too costly.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.5%
Net Rtg -41.1
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Offense -2.6
Hustle +3.5
Defense +3.8
Raw total +4.7
Avg player in 18.4m -9.4
Impact -4.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.4

A sharp regression in finishing touch completely derailed his momentum from previous outings. Forcing contested looks inside the arc led to empty trips and a noticeable dip in his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.1%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg -2.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.4m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +1.1
Defense +0.8
Raw total +3.9
Avg player in 16.4m -8.3
Impact -4.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.4

Failed to launch a single attempt during a brief, ineffective stint. His presence went entirely unnoticed on both ends of the floor, resulting in a quick hook from the coaching staff.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -131.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 4.8m -2.4
Impact -2.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.3

Rushed a perimeter look during a highly abbreviated appearance. He was simply out there to run out the clock.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Offense -0.9
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total -0.9
Avg player in 0.8m -0.4
Impact -1.3
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Tossed up a quick miss during a few seconds of garbage time run. His recent shooting struggles remain unresolved due to the lack of meaningful minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Offense -0.8
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.6
Raw total -0.2
Avg player in 0.8m -0.4
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Inserted solely to eat the final seconds of the game clock. No measurable impact could be generated in this timeframe.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 0.8m -0.4
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.1

Logged less than a minute of action in a purely situational substitution. The sample size offers nothing of analytical value.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.6
Raw total +0.6
Avg player in 0.8m -0.5
Impact +0.1
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Spent less than a minute on the hardwood as the game concluded. He merely occupied space during the final possession.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 0.8m -0.4
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 36.6m
26
pts
2
reb
10
ast
Impact
+8.4

Heavy offensive initiation fueled a stellar box score impact as he relentlessly broke down the primary point of attack. Even with streaky perimeter execution, his aggressive downhill playmaking kept the opposing defense constantly rotating.

Shooting
FG 10/22 (45.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.7%
USG% 29.6%
Net Rtg +9.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Offense +20.0
Hustle +4.4
Defense +2.5
Raw total +26.9
Avg player in 36.6m -18.5
Impact +8.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Mikal Bridges 32.2m
11
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-4.5

A low-usage offensive role limited his ability to dictate the game's flow. While he provided adequate perimeter pressure, his shifts ultimately bled points due to disjointed team defense during his rotation patterns.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.8%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +19.0
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Offense +7.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.6
Raw total +11.9
Avg player in 32.2m -16.4
Impact -4.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Josh Hart 30.8m
12
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+13.3

Relentless energy plays and elite defensive positioning completely tilted the game in New York's favor. He generated massive value through off-ball activity and transition disruption rather than raw scoring volume.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +23.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Offense +10.3
Hustle +5.4
Defense +13.2
Raw total +28.9
Avg player in 30.8m -15.6
Impact +13.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 31.6%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 2
21
pts
12
reb
6
ast
Impact
+11.6

Interior dominance and rim protection drove a massive positive swing during his shifts. His ability to anchor the paint defensively perfectly complemented a steady diet of high-percentage looks inside the arc.

Shooting
FG 10/17 (58.8%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.8%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg +10.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Offense +15.8
Hustle +1.9
Defense +8.6
Raw total +26.3
Avg player in 29.0m -14.7
Impact +11.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S OG Anunoby 26.8m
15
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.8

Despite hyper-efficient shot selection that buoyed his offensive metrics, his overall impact slipped into the red. A surprisingly quiet defensive showing failed to anchor the perimeter, allowing opponents to exploit his minutes.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 96.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +12.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Offense +10.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.2
Raw total +11.8
Avg player in 26.8m -13.6
Impact -1.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
12
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.3

Snapping out of a recent shooting slump provided a necessary spacing element, yet his minutes still yielded a negative return. The offensive uptick couldn't overcome the structural defensive breakdowns that occurred during his floor time.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +14.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Offense +5.4
Hustle +1.4
Defense +3.0
Raw total +9.8
Avg player in 24.1m -12.1
Impact -2.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.6

Completely abandoned his typical offensive role to function strictly as a defensive specialist. His elite rim deterrence salvaged a positive overall rating despite being an absolute non-factor in the scoring column.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.4%
Net Rtg +5.4
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.3m
Offense +3.2
Hustle +0.7
Defense +8.0
Raw total +11.9
Avg player in 20.3m -10.3
Impact +1.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.4

An unexpected scoring punch masked severe rotational vulnerabilities that cratered his net impact. Opponents consistently targeted his defensive gaps, neutralizing any value gained from his improved offensive confidence.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +16.1
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Offense +1.6
Hustle +0.7
Defense +0.1
Raw total +2.4
Avg player in 19.2m -9.8
Impact -7.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
4
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.8

Trademark point-of-attack harassment disrupted the opponent's offensive rhythm in short bursts. However, his lack of half-court scoring gravity allowed defenders to sag off, stalling the team's offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg +54.3
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Offense +2.8
Hustle +2.1
Defense +3.1
Raw total +8.0
Avg player in 17.4m -8.8
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.5

A fleeting appearance prevented him from establishing any rhythm or defensive presence. His impact was purely negligible in this situational deployment.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.0m -0.5
Impact -0.5
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Relegated to a brief cameo at the end of the rotation. There was simply not enough floor time to register any meaningful statistical footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
Offense -0.7
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.6
Raw total -0.1
Avg player in 1.0m -0.5
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Burned less than a minute of game clock in a strictly mop-up capacity. The sample size is entirely too small to evaluate his current form.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 0.8m -0.4
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Made a blink-and-you-miss-it appearance at the tail end of the contest. He essentially just logged cardio without factoring into the game script.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.2
Avg player in 0.8m -0.4
Impact -0.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0