Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
TOR lead CLE lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 168 attempts

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell Hard 7/16 -1.3
Harden Hard 5/13 +2.3
Mobley 4/13 -6.5
Strus Hard 5/10 +3.2
Tyson Hard 5/9 +4.0
Allen Open 5/7 +1.3
Wade Hard 2/5 -0.4
Schröder Hard 1/2 +1.2
Merrill Hard 1/2 +1.2
Bryant 1/2 -0.5

TOR TOR Shot-making Δ

Barrett 12/19 +10.1
Barnes 11/17 +7.4
Murray-Boyles Open 11/15 +3.7
Ingram Hard 5/9 +2.8
Poeltl Open 4/6 +0.9
Walter 0/6 -6.7
Battle Hard 5/5 +9.4
Shead 1/3 -1.2
Mamukelashvili Open 0/3 -4.0
Mogbo Open 1/1 +0.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
CLE
TOR
36/81 Field Goals 50/87
44.4% Field Goal % 57.5%
14/45 3-Pointers 14/23
31.1% 3-Point % 60.9%
18/23 Free Throws 12/21
78.3% Free Throw % 57.1%
57.1% True Shooting % 65.5%
52 Total Rebounds 45
16 Offensive 11
26 Defensive 24
23 Assists 29
1.05 Assist/TO Ratio 2.42
20 Turnovers 11
7 Steals 11
6 Blocks 4
15 Fouls 21
40 Points in Paint 60
5 Fast Break Pts 9
8 Points off TOs 23
16 Second Chance Pts 20
39 Bench Points 40
5 Largest Lead 25
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Scottie Barnes
33 PTS · 5 REB · 11 AST · 34.8 MIN
+33.08
2
RJ Barrett
33 PTS · 5 REB · 5 AST · 39.2 MIN
+26.68
3
Collin Murray-Boyles
22 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 28.2 MIN
+25.63
4
Jarrett Allen
12 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 26.5 MIN
+15.45
5
Evan Mobley
15 PTS · 6 REB · 7 AST · 32.9 MIN
+15.41
6
Jaylon Tyson
13 PTS · 2 REB · 4 AST · 15.6 MIN
+13.96
7
Jamison Battle
14 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 15.7 MIN
+13.85
8
Max Strus
15 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 25.9 MIN
+12.81
9
Jakob Poeltl
8 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 18.2 MIN
+10.02
10
Jamal Shead
2 PTS · 1 REB · 5 AST · 29.6 MIN
+8.04
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:06 TOR shot clock Team TURNOVER 104–126
Q4 0:30 T. Bryant Free Throw 1 of 1 (3 PTS) 104–126
Q4 0:30 J. Mogbo shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Bryant 1 FT) 103–126
Q4 0:30 T. Bryant floating Jump Shot (2 PTS) (N. Tomlin 1 AST) 103–126
Q4 0:39 J. Mogbo alley-oop DUNK (2 PTS) (G. Temple 1 AST) 101–126
Q4 0:50 TEAM offensive REBOUND 101–124
Q4 0:50 MISS T. Jackson-Davis tip Layup 101–124
Q4 0:50 T. Jackson-Davis REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 101–124
Q4 0:52 MISS G. Temple 15' pullup Shot 101–124
Q4 1:16 T. Proctor Free Throw 2 of 2 (2 PTS) 101–124
Q4 1:16 T. Proctor Free Throw 1 of 2 (1 PTS) 100–124
Q4 1:16 T. Jackson-Davis shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Proctor 2 FT) 99–124
Q4 1:18 T. Bryant REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 99–124
Q4 1:21 T. Bryant BLOCK (1 BLK) 99–124
Q4 1:21 MISS A. Lawson driving Layup - blocked 99–124

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

TOR Toronto Raptors
S RJ Barrett 39.2m
33
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+26.4

Barrett caught fire from the perimeter, draining 6-of-8 threes to fuel a 33-point explosion (↑ avg 20.4) and a stellar +23.5 Offense credit. He paired this scoring barrage with lockdown perimeter defense, contesting 9 shots and limiting his assignments to 6-of-16 shooting to drive a +7.8 Defense mark.

Shooting
FG 12/19 (63.2%)
3PT 6/8 (75.0%)
FT 3/7 (42.9%)
Advanced
TS% 74.7%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +34.0
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +25.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +8.3
Hustle +1.5
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Scottie Barnes 34.8m
33
pts
5
reb
11
ast
Impact
+28.3

Barnes operated as an absolute offensive juggernaut, torching the defense for 33 points (↑ avg 16.6) on highly efficient 11-of-17 shooting. His dual-threat playmaking was equally lethal, as he dished out 11 assists to generate a massive +33.4 Offense credit while committing just one turnover.

Shooting
FG 11/17 (64.7%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.1%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg +36.0
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +26.6
Creation +3.1
Shot Making +7.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Brandon Ingram 29.1m
12
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.2

Ingram took a backseat offensively, attempting just 9 shots to finish with 12 points (↓ avg 19.2) and a modest +5.3 Offense credit. However, he channeled his energy into defensive disruption, grabbing 2 steals (↑ avg 0.5) and holding his matchups to 38% shooting to secure a +3.5 Defense mark.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +26.7
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Ja'Kobe Walter 26.2m
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.1

A disastrous shooting night completely erased Walter's offensive value, as he bricked all six of his attempts to finish scoreless (↓ avg 11.0) with a -4.7 Offense credit. His struggles extended to the defensive end, where opponents easily shot 67% against him when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg +12.1
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring -5.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jakob Poeltl 18.2m
8
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.5

Poeltl anchored the interior defense effectively, logging 6 contests and holding his primary matchups to a stifling 36% from the floor. He was highly efficient in his limited offensive role, converting 4-of-6 shots to earn a +11.8 Offense credit despite falling short of his season scoring average.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg +13.4
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense -5.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Jamal Shead 29.6m
2
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.4

Shead was an absolute menace in the passing lanes, racking up 5 steals (↑ avg 1.0) and 8 deflections to power a massive +12.7 Defense credit. However, his offensive passivity and 3 turnovers dragged down his overall value, resulting in a -3.0 Offense mark on just 2 points.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 9.8%
Net Rtg +25.4
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense +11.8
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 3
22
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+24.1

Murray-Boyles dominated the paint with ruthless efficiency, converting 11-of-15 shots to pour in 22 points (↑ avg 12.4) and generate a massive +23.8 Offense credit. He was equally engaged doing the dirty work, setting 5 screen assists and grabbing 8 rebounds (↑ avg 5.2) to round out a stellar performance.

Shooting
FG 11/15 (73.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 73.3%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg +40.0
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +18.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +10.2
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
14
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+10.7

Battle delivered a flawless shooting masterclass off the bench, hitting all five of his attempts—including 4-of-4 from deep—to post 14 points (↑ avg 3.5). This explosive perimeter marksmanship translated directly into a +14.0 Offense credit, while he also held his defensive matchups to a respectable 38% shooting.

Shooting
FG 5/5 (100.0%)
3PT 4/4 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 140.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +72.3
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.7m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.5

Mamukelashvili's typically reliable scoring vanished entirely, as he missed all his shots to finish with 0 points (↓ avg 12.5) and a -4.1 Offense credit. He compensated by locking down his matchups, holding opponents to a miserable 1-of-6 shooting (17%) while contesting 6 shots to earn a +2.0 Defense mark.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 17.9%
Net Rtg -4.3
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.1m
Scoring -4.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.0

Jackson-Davis was virtually invisible during his 94 seconds of garbage time, missing his only shot attempt to finish scoreless. His lack of engagement led to a flat +0.0 Hustle credit and a slight negative drag on the defense (-0.8).

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.0

Temple's microscopic cameo yielded nothing but cardio and a single assist. He missed his lone field goal attempt, resulting in a -0.3 Offense credit and completely flat hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.8

Relegated to the deep bench, Lawson failed to register any meaningful stats during his brief appearance. His only contribution was a missed shot, which dragged his Offense credit down to -0.8 while offering nothing in terms of hustle or defense.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.5

Mogbo made the most of his single offensive touch, converting his only shot attempt to earn a +2.0 Offense credit. However, he failed to grab a rebound (↓ avg 1.9) or record any hustle stats, limiting his overall impact during the brief stint.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Dick was a complete ghost during his minute-and-a-half on the floor, failing to record a single statistic in the box score or hustle tracking. This absolute lack of involvement resulted in flat +0.0 credits across Offense, Hustle, and Defense.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S James Harden 33.1m
18
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-9.4

Severe turnover issues plagued Harden's night, as his 8 giveaways (↑ avg 3.3) directly fueled a negative Offense credit (-1.9). His playmaking also dried up with just 4 assists (↓ avg 7.5), compounding the damage of a sluggish 5-of-13 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 57.5%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -17.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 8
S Evan Mobley 32.9m
15
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+10.6

Mobley shifted into a playmaking hub role with 7 assists (↑ avg 3.4), offsetting a brutal 4-of-13 shooting night to still post a +10.5 Offense credit. His rim protection remained active with 14 contests and a +9.1 Defense mark, even though opponents converted 56% of their looks when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 45.4%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg -29.0
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +6.7
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
15
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.5

A frigid perimeter stroke (1-of-7 from deep) derailed Mitchell's scoring punch, dropping him to just 15 points (↓ avg 26.5) and a muted +4.3 Offense credit. He did manage to stifle his primary matchups, holding them to 38% shooting, but the lack of dynamic creation (3 assists) limited his overall influence.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.9%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -22.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jarrett Allen 26.5m
12
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.5

Allen made his presence felt on the interior with 15 contests and 3 blocks (↑ avg 0.9), anchoring a +5.8 Defense credit despite opponents shooting 58% against him. He was highly efficient when targeted on offense (5-of-7 FG), yielding a +10.7 Offense mark even with his rebounding numbers dropping below his season norm.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -38.7
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 57.9%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 1
S Dean Wade 22.0m
5
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.2

Wade provided steady, low-usage value without forcing the issue offensively, generating a +4.6 Offense credit despite quiet shooting (2-of-5 FG). He held his own on the other end, contributing a +2.9 Defense mark while his primary assignments shot 4-of-8 from the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.5%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -20.8
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.0m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +5.4
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Max Strus 25.9m
15
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.2

Strus provided a vital perimeter spark, knocking down 4-of-8 from beyond the arc to drive a robust +12.2 Offense credit. He also stepped up defensively, limiting his primary matchups to 3-of-8 shooting (38%) while chipping in above-average rebounding (6 boards).

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.9%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg -28.2
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +6.7
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Sam Merrill 17.9m
3
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.0

Despite a massive drop in scoring volume with just 3 points (↓ avg 11.3), Merrill found ways to contribute through active perimeter defense. He racked up 5 contests and 3 deflections to earn a +3.0 Hustle credit, while holding his assignments to 40% shooting from the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 4.5%
Net Rtg -8.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.9m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaylon Tyson 15.6m
13
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.1

Tyson delivered a highly efficient offensive punch off the bench, hitting 3-of-6 from deep to power a stellar +13.2 Offense credit. He complemented his scoring with crisp ball movement, doubling his season average with 4 assists while committing zero turnovers.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +3.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.6m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Keon Ellis 14.8m
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.3

Ellis was a complete non-factor offensively, failing to attempt a single shot and posting 0 points (↓ avg 7.9) in his 14 minutes. He managed to grab 4 rebounds (↑ avg 2.3) and set 2 screen assists, but his overall impact remained muted due to the lack of scoring threat.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.1%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.7

Schröder's brief stint was marred by sloppy decision-making, as 3 turnovers (↑ avg 1.2) in just five minutes tanked his value to a -3.7 Offense credit. He completely failed to initiate the offense, finishing without a single assist (↓ avg 4.1) while taking only two shots.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 35.7%
Net Rtg -62.1
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.3m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.3

In a microscopic two-minute cameo, Bryant managed to squeeze out a +2.4 Offense credit by converting his only interior look and a free throw. He added a blocked shot to secure a +1.2 Defense mark, making the most of his extremely limited runway.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.8

Porter Jr. was entirely invisible during his brief time on the floor, failing to register a single counting stat aside from one missed three-pointer. His lack of engagement resulted in a flat +0.0 Hustle credit and a slight negative drag on the offense.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.7

Tomlin logged just under three minutes of action, missing his only field goal attempt to finish scoreless (↓ avg 5.2). He did manage to chip in slightly on the margins with 2 contests and an assist, yielding a minor +1.0 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.5

Nance Jr. essentially just did cardio during his two-and-a-half minutes of playing time, failing to record a single box score statistic. His complete lack of involvement was reflected in flat +0.0 credits across Offense, Hustle, and Defense.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.6

Proctor barely factored into the game plan during his brief stint, scoring his only 2 points (↓ avg 8.9) at the charity stripe. Without a single field goal attempt or hustle stat recorded, his +2.4 Offense credit was entirely driven by drawing a foul.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0