ORL

2025-26 Season

TRISTAN DA SILVA

Orlando Magic | Forward | 6-8
Tristan da Silva
10.1 PPG
3.7 RPG
1.6 APG
24.8 MPG
-1.4 Impact

Silva produces at an below average rate for a 25-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.4
Scoring +6.2
Points 10.1 PPG × +1.00 = +10.1
Missed 2PT 1.9/g × -0.78 = -1.5
Missed 3PT 2.6/g × -0.87 = -2.3
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +1.9
Assists 1.6/g × +0.50 = +0.8
Off. Rebounds 0.9/g × +1.26 = +1.1
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Defense +1.3
Steals 0.9/g × +2.30 = +2.1
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.8/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Contested Shots 3.9/g × +0.20 = +0.8
Deflections 1.7/g × +0.65 = +1.1
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.2
Net Impact
-1.4
30th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 56th
10.1 PPG
Efficiency 30th
54.0% TS
Playmaking 50th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 39th
3.7 RPG
Rim Protection 43th
0.13/min
Hustle 23th
0.08/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 80th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tristan da Silva’s opening twenty games were defined by a chaotic promotion to the starting lineup, oscillating wildly between lethal sharpshooting and disastrous vanishing acts. He initially thrived as a two-way sparkplug off the bench, peaking during the 10/24 vs ATL matchup where timely perimeter shot-making fueled a stellar +13.7 impact score. That early efficiency earned him a starting role, which paid immediate dividends during the 11/14 vs BKN contest as he punished over-helping defenders with quick-trigger shooting for 22 points and nine rebounds. Yet, his expanded minutes soon exposed hidden costs, even when his traditional stats looked robust. During the 11/20 vs LAC game, he tallied 17 points and eight rebounds, but his overall impact slipped to -0.3 because his inefficient 7-for-17 shooting dragged down the half-court offense. The bottom completely fell out just two days later during the 11/22 vs NYK matchup. He bricked open catch-and-shoot looks and was constantly blown by on defense, resulting in a brutal -13.4 impact score despite dishing out four assists. When he decisively pulls the trigger from the corners, he elevates the entire rotation, but his maddening inconsistency holds him back from being a reliable nightly fixture.

Tristan da Silva spent this midseason stretch battling a maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between passive disappearing acts and brief flashes of competence. Even when his shot fell, hidden costs often ruined his value. During the 12/27 vs DEN matchup, he poured in 17 points on 7-of-11 shooting, yet posted a -1.2 impact score because severe defensive lapses completely erased his offensive production. A similar emptiness plagued his 01/04 vs IND start. Despite tallying 10 points, a severe lack of physical engagement left him with zero rebounds and cratered his overall rating to a brutal -9.9 impact mark. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to contribute when his jumper completely abandoned him. On 01/15 vs MEM, da Silva bricked his way to an ugly 3-of-11 shooting night for just 8 points, but his exceptional defensive instincts salvaged a +2.6 impact score. To survive in this league, he must eliminate these jarring extremes.

This mid-season stretch was a turbulent transition into the starting lineup, defined by wild swings between offensive brilliance and complete passivity. Early on, da Silva was an absolute liability off the bench. He posted a devastating -11.3 impact score on 02/03 vs OKC, disappearing entirely while clanking open spot-up looks. Thrust into the starting five later in the month, his erratic jumper continued to haunt him, resulting in a brutal -11.9 impact mark on 02/26 vs HOU. When his shot failed to fall, his tendency to become passive completely tanked his overall value despite occasional defensive hustle. Yet, when he finally found his rhythm, his two-way ceiling was undeniable. He poured in 26 points and 7 rebounds in 41 minutes on 03/12 vs WAS, generating a stellar +12.7 impact score because his suffocating perimeter defense completely disrupted the opponent's flow. He also delivered a flawless 7-for-7 shooting night off the bench on 03/05 vs DAL, riding elite spatial awareness to a massive +17.0 impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Silva's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 58% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Silva consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 72 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Brunson 75.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 7
S. Fontecchio 54.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
W. Riley 53.9 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
L. Ball 53.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 7
D. Robinson 47.8 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
J. Harden 44.4 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
N. Powell 42.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
B. Coulibaly 40.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
K. Durant 39.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
H. Barnes 38.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Coulibaly 77.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.32
PTS 25
J. Smith Jr. 71.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 9
J. Jaquez Jr. 63.1 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 16
S. Fontecchio 56.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 16
D. Robinson 47.4 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
B. Miller 39.7 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.45
PTS 18
Z. Williams 38.3 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
O. Dieng 37.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
J. Harden 36.8 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
S. Hauser 36.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

71
Games
10.1
PPG
3.7
RPG
1.6
APG
0.9
SPG
0.3
BPG
45.0
FG%
38.7
3P%
88.6
FT%
24.8
MPG

GAME LOG

71 games played