LAL

2025-26 Season

LUKE KENNARD

Los Angeles Lakers | Guard | 6-5
Luke Kennard
8.1 PPG
2.2 RPG
1.9 APG
21.2 MPG
-2.1 Impact

Kennard produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.1
Scoring +6.0
Points 8.1 PPG × +1.00 = +8.1
Missed 2PT 0.8/g × -0.78 = -0.6
Missed 3PT 1.6/g × -0.87 = -1.4
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +1.7
Assists 1.9/g × +0.50 = +0.9
Off. Rebounds 0.6/g × +1.26 = +0.8
Turnovers -1.4
Turnovers 0.7/g × -1.95 = -1.4
Defense +0.1
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 0.1/g × +0.90 = +0.1
Def. Rebounds 1.7/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Contested Shots 2.2/g × +0.20 = +0.4
Deflections 1.3/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +7.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.0
Net Impact
-2.1
35th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 41th
8.2 PPG
Efficiency 99th
66.5% TS
Playmaking 35th
2.0 APG
Rebounding 28th
2.2 RPG
Rim Protection 26th
0.09/min
Hustle 13th
0.07/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 81th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Luke Kennard's opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by maddening passivity and an outright refusal to exert his gravitational pull on opposing defenses. During a brutal 10/22 vs TOR outing, he bled points in transition and bricked his signature catch-and-shoot looks, dragging his impact score down to a catastrophic -17.6. He occasionally flashed his true ceiling as a sniper, punishing defensive rotations with lethal floor-spacing during a 17-point performance on 10/29 vs BKN that yielded a +4.5 impact. However, those aggressive nights were the exception rather than the rule. By the time he faced the Sixers on 11/30 vs PHI, his offensive footprint had vanished entirely; he missed all three of his attempts from deep and posted an abysmal -8.3 impact. When Kennard actively hunts his shot, his gravity opens up the interior for his teammates. But when he hesitates, his lack of defensive resistance and failure to stretch the floor turn him into a glaring liability.

Luke Kennard’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme offensive volatility and a giant defensive bullseye on his back. Even when his shot fell, his physical limitations often carried a heavy hidden cost. Take his performance against OKC on 12/29, where he scored 12 points but still posted a -5.4 impact score because opponents relentlessly hunted him in pick-and-roll actions. When the jumper vanished entirely, he became a total liability. Facing BOS on 01/17, Kennard lost his rhythm and logged a disastrous -10.3 impact by failing to provide the floor spacing that justifies his minutes. Yet, his undeniable gravity as a shooter salvaged his value on nights when he caught fire. He was an absolute flamethrower against GSW on 01/11, ruthlessly punishing late defensive rotations to rack up 22 points and a massive +11.0 impact. He remains a potent but highly situational weapon, capable of either warping a defense or being played right off the floor.

This twenty-game stretch was defined by a maddening passivity that frequently turned a lethal sharpshooter into a mere offensive decoy. Far too often, Kennard's hesitancy to let it fly from deep allowed defenders to cheat off him and muck up the spacing, which was glaringly obvious during the 02/20 vs LAC matchup where he posted a brutal -6.6 impact. Even when his shots actually fell, defensive limitations and a lack of secondary playmaking dragged his overall value into the red. During the 03/08 vs NYK contest, a solid 12-point scoring night was completely undone by hidden negative factors on the other end of the floor, resulting in a poor -3.4 impact score. Yet, when he actively hunted his shot and contributed on the margins, his true value emerged. Look no further than the 02/12 vs DAL game; he scored just 9 points, but by grabbing 7 rebounds and punishing defensive lapses with quick-trigger perimeter strikes, he generated a massive +7.0 impact. Ultimately, his theoretical gravity means absolutely nothing if he refuses to pull the trigger or defend his yard.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Kennard has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~5 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 70% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Kennard locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. McConnell 54.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 10
B. Sheppard 51.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
I. Joe 48.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
R. Sheppard 43.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
J. McCain 41.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
T. Hardaway Jr. 40.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
G. Dick 40.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
T. Jones 38.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
J. Champagnie 36.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
B. Podziemski 36.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Sheppard 77.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 6
K. Huerter 45.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
G. Dick 43.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
T. Hardaway Jr. 39.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Champagnie 37.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
C. Wallace 37.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
A. Wiggins 34.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
L. Ball 33.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. McCain 32.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Dosunmu 32.6 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 16

SEASON STATS

73
Games
8.1
PPG
2.2
RPG
1.9
APG
0.6
SPG
0.1
BPG
54.2
FG%
48.7
3P%
92.6
FT%
21.2
MPG

GAME LOG

73 games played