Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
TOR lead CLE lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
CLE 2P — 3P —
TOR 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 180 attempts

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell Hard 11/26 -1.2
Mobley 9/15 +3.7
Harden 5/14 -2.9
Allen Open 6/8 +2.1
Wade 4/8 +0.4
Strus Hard 2/6 +0.5
Tyson Hard 2/6 -1.1
Merrill Hard 1/5 -2.8
Schröder 0/4 -4.7
Bryant Hard 0/1 -1.1

TOR TOR Shot-making Δ

Barnes 11/21 +0.9
Barrett Hard 8/21 -0.9
Walter Hard 7/13 +4.6
Murray-Boyles Open 6/10 -0.1
Shead Hard 2/9 -2.8
Battle 2/4 +0.6
Lawson Hard 2/3 +3.1
Mamukelashvili 1/3 -1.2
Poeltl Open 1/3 -1.7
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
CLE
TOR
40/93 Field Goals 40/87
43.0% Field Goal % 46.0%
11/41 3-Pointers 13/36
26.8% 3-Point % 36.1%
19/27 Free Throws 19/23
70.4% Free Throw % 82.6%
52.4% True Shooting % 57.7%
65 Total Rebounds 48
19 Offensive 10
33 Defensive 28
23 Assists 27
1.28 Assist/TO Ratio 1.69
18 Turnovers 15
8 Steals 13
4 Blocks 9
21 Fouls 25
54 Points in Paint 48
6 Fast Break Pts 20
17 Points off TOs 25
22 Second Chance Pts 10
24 Bench Points 30
6 Largest Lead 15
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Scottie Barnes
25 PTS · 7 REB · 14 AST · 48.0 MIN
+29.26
2
Ja'Kobe Walter
24 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 43.0 MIN
+25.15
3
Evan Mobley
26 PTS · 14 REB · 3 AST · 41.2 MIN
+22.44
4
James Harden
16 PTS · 9 REB · 9 AST · 44.0 MIN
+16.89
5
Jarrett Allen
14 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 33.8 MIN
+16.52
6
Collin Murray-Boyles
17 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 39.9 MIN
+16.32
7
RJ Barrett
24 PTS · 9 REB · 3 AST · 43.4 MIN
+7.77
8
Donovan Mitchell
24 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 41.0 MIN
+7.57
9
Jakob Poeltl
2 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 21.5 MIN
+7.31
10
Dean Wade
10 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 28.1 MIN
+5.33
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q5 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 110–112
Q5 0:00 MISS E. Mobley 28' 3PT 110–112
Q5 0:01 R. Barrett 29' 3PT (24 PTS) (S. Barnes 14 AST) 110–112
Q5 0:10 E. Mobley lost ball out-of-bounds TURNOVER (3 TO) 110–109
Q5 0:18 S. Barnes take personal FOUL (2 PF) 110–109
Q5 0:23 E. Mobley REBOUND (Off:4 Def:10) 110–109
Q5 0:25 MISS J. Shead Free Throw 2 of 2 110–109
Q5 0:25 J. Shead Free Throw 1 of 2 (7 PTS) 110–109
Q5 0:25 J. Allen shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Shead 2 FT) 110–108
Q5 0:33 D. Mitchell driving finger roll Layup (24 PTS) 110–108
Q5 0:48 J. Allen REBOUND (Off:3 Def:4) 108–108
Q5 0:51 MISS J. Walter 12' driving floating Shot 108–108
Q5 0:53 TEAM offensive REBOUND 108–108
Q5 0:53 D. Mitchell BLOCK (1 BLK) 108–108
Q5 0:53 MISS C. Murray-Boyles running Layup - blocked 108–108

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

TOR Toronto Raptors
S Scottie Barnes 48.0m
25
pts
7
reb
14
ast
Impact
+21.9

Barnes fully embraced his role as a towering offensive engine, dishing out a massive 14 assists (↑ his 8.6 average) to orchestrate a +20.5 offensive credit. He was equally dominant as a scorer, pouring in 25 points on efficient 11-of-21 shooting despite missing both of his three-point attempts. His defensive disruption was elite, racking up 3 steals and 3 blocks (↑ his 1.2 average) to anchor a stellar +9.9 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.9%
USG% 25.2%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 48.0m
Scoring +17.6
Creation +4.0
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +6.0
Defense +8.0
Turnovers -7.1
STL 3
BLK 3
TO 3
S RJ Barrett 43.4m
24
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.8

Barrett operated as a high-volume wing but struggled with momentum-killing tunnel vision, needing 21 shots to score 24 points. His decision-making was particularly damaging, as 5 turnovers (↓ his 2.7 average) actively dragged down his +7.5 offensive credit. However, he remained highly engaged on the glass with 9 rebounds (↑ his 6.0 average) and contested 13 shots to provide solid two-way effort.

Shooting
FG 8/21 (38.1%)
3PT 4/12 (33.3%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.7%
USG% 30.1%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.4m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +10.5
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -12.6
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Ja'Kobe Walter 43.0m
24
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+20.1

Walter thrived in an elevated spot-starter role, erupting for 24 points (↑ his 10.1 average) on highly efficient 7-of-13 shooting. His lethal perimeter marksmanship (4-of-9 from deep) fueled a massive +20.2 offensive credit, completely offsetting his lack of playmaking (zero assists). He was also a menace defensively, swiping 3 steals (↑ his 1.7 average) and logging 7 contests to secure a robust +7.7 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.7%
USG% 16.8%
Net Rtg -4.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.0m
Scoring +19.4
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +1.5
Defense +3.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 0
S Jamal Shead 33.4m
7
pts
1
reb
6
ast
Impact
-12.3

Shead's offensive value was severely dragged down by erratic finishing, as he converted just 2 of his 9 field goal attempts. While his 6 assists demonstrated his playmaking ambitions, his inability to score efficiently resulted in a negative offensive credit (-0.4). His lack of defensive disruption (zero deflections) further compounded a frustrating night where he struggled to generate positive momentum.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 35.4%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jakob Poeltl 21.5m
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.2

Poeltl was virtually invisible as an interior finisher, managing just 2 points (↓ his 9.5 average) on a mere 3 field goal attempts. Despite his offensive passivity, he found ways to contribute heavily on the other end, logging 11 contests and 6 deflections to generate a +6.2 defensive credit. His 2 steals (↑ his 0.9 average) further highlighted a performance defined entirely by gritty defensive disruption rather than scoring.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 6.1%
Net Rtg +2.4
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.5m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
17
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.9

Murray-Boyles operated as a bruising two-way force, pairing 17 points (↑ his 13.5 average) on 60% shooting with relentless defensive activity. His 7 deflections, 2 steals, and 3 blocks (↑ his 0.9 average) powered a stellar +6.6 defensive credit. Despite coughing up 4 turnovers (↓ his 1.1 average), his +12.7 offensive credit shows he was highly effective when attacking the paint.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 67.2%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +6.9
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.9m
Scoring +13.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +8.9
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -10.9
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 4
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.8

Mamukelashvili was an offensive ghost, attempting just 3 shots and finishing with a mere 2 points (↓ his 9.5 average). Despite his scoring struggles, he found ways to contribute defensively, using 1 steal and 1 block (↑ his 0.3 average) to anchor a solid +5.0 defensive credit. His low-usage shift highlights a night where his typical floor-stretching value completely vanished.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +10.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.4m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

Battle managed a brief but efficient scoring cameo, hitting 2 of his 4 shots to generate 5 points (↑ his 4.4 average) in just 11 minutes. However, his overall impact was muted by complete statistical invisibility elsewhere, recording zero rebounds (↓ his 1.5 average) and zero assists. His +3.3 offensive credit reflects his shot-making, but his -0.4 defensive credit shows he was a liability on the other end.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
A.J. Lawson 10.2m
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.9

Lawson provided a sudden burst of perimeter shooting off the deep bench, hitting 2 of his 3 attempts from deep to score 6 points (↑ his 4.1 average). While his shot-making earned him a +3.2 offensive credit, he offered absolutely nothing else across his 10 minutes of action. His lack of defensive resistance (just 1 contest) resulted in a -1.2 defensive credit, highlighting his one-dimensional impact.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +13.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.2m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S James Harden 44.0m
16
pts
9
reb
9
ast
Impact
+8.4

Harden mitigated a poor shooting night (5-of-14 from the floor) by operating as a high-leverage floor general, racking up 9 assists (↑ his 7.1 average) and 9 rebounds. His +12.8 offensive credit highlights his ability to orchestrate the offense even when his own jumper isn't falling. He also chipped in defensively with 3 deflections and 2 steals, contributing to a solid +6.2 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.4%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +9.0
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 44.0m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +11.4
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -9.5
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S Evan Mobley 41.2m
26
pts
14
reb
3
ast
Impact
+21.8

Mobley dominated as a two-way hub, leveraging a heavy workload into a massive offensive output (+21.3 offensive credit). He paired efficient scoring (26 points on 9-of-15 shooting) with active floor-stretching (3-of-7 from deep) to anchor the frontcourt. His 6 deflections and 10 contests powered a robust +6.8 defensive credit, showcasing his elite disruption.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 70.2%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -6.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.2m
Scoring +19.9
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +13.9
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
24
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.7

Inefficient volume shooting defined Mitchell's night, as he needed 26 attempts to score 24 points while struggling heavily from beyond the arc (2-of-10). His playmaking also dipped below his usual standard with just 2 assists (↓ his 4.0 average) against 3 turnovers. Consequently, his modest +6.7 offensive credit reflects a high-usage performance that failed to create consistent high-quality looks.

Shooting
FG 11/26 (42.3%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.2%
USG% 29.9%
Net Rtg -6.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.0m
Scoring +13.7
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +1.5
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Jarrett Allen 33.8m
14
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+12.1

Allen provided ruthless interior efficiency, converting 6 of his 8 field goal attempts to generate a strong +14.0 offensive credit. His rim presence was equally vital on the other end, where 15 shot contests and 2 blocks (↑ his 1.5 average) anchored the paint. This high-level two-way execution allowed him to thrive without needing heavy usage.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/6 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +8.9
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
S Max Strus 19.7m
6
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.2

Strus struggled to find his usual scoring volume, finishing with just 6 points (↓ his 10.9 average) on a low-usage 2-of-6 shooting night. While he hit half his perimeter looks (2-of-4 from deep), his lack of defensive disruption—registering zero deflections or loose-ball recoveries—limited his overall effectiveness. His modest +3.5 offensive credit reflects a quiet night where he operated mostly on the margins.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -22.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.7m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Dean Wade 28.1m
10
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.5

Wade stepped up offensively with 10 points (↑ his 5.2 average), converting efficiently inside the arc while hitting a pair of triples. However, his ball security was uncharacteristically poor, as his 2 turnovers (↓ his 0.4 average) slightly dampened his +5.1 offensive credit. He provided solid rebounding from the wing, grabbing 5 boards to help stabilize the second unit.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg +21.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +4.4
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -6.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Sam Merrill 17.6m
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.6

Merrill's perimeter touch completely vanished, resulting in a hollow 2-point outing (↓ his 10.3 average) on 1-of-5 shooting. His inability to connect from deep (0-of-3) actively harmed the floor spacing, leading to a negative offensive credit (-1.6). While he managed 3 deflections to salvage some hustle value, the lack of scoring rendered his minutes largely ineffective.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg -21.6
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.0

Schröder endured a brutal shooting performance, failing to make a single field goal (0-of-4) and relying entirely on 7 free throws for his scoring. His playmaking was equally absent with just 1 assist (↓ his 3.5 average), leading to a meager +1.1 offensive credit. He salvaged some defensive value (+3.5 credit) through 2 steals and 2 loose-ball recoveries, but his offensive creation was practically non-existent.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 46.5%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg -35.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Jaylon Tyson 16.0m
5
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.0

Erratic perimeter shooting defined Tyson's night, as he connected on just 1 of his 5 attempts from beyond the arc to finish with 5 points (↓ his 10.1 average). While his 3 assists (↑ his 2.2 average) showed some playmaking utility, a negative defensive credit (-0.6) and minimal hustle stats (1 contest) limited his two-way impact. His +1.6 offensive credit reflects a frustrating lack of scoring efficiency.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg -18.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +4.1
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -5.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.7

Bryant was completely invisible offensively during his brief 7-minute cameo, failing to score (↓ his 6.2 average) and attempting just one shot. His defensive impact was equally hollow, yielding a -0.5 defensive credit while grabbing only 2 rebounds. This empty-calorie shift highlighted his struggles to carve out consistent value as a deep-bench reserve.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.8%
Net Rtg -46.7
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.4m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0