MIA

2025-26 Season

BAM ADEBAYO

Miami Heat | Center-Forward | 6-9
Bam Adebayo
19.9PPG
9.9RPG
3.1APG
32.1MPG
+15.5 Impact

Adebayo produces at an elite rate for a 32-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+15.5
Scoring +16.7
Points Scored 19.9 PPG = +19.9
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -7.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.8
Creation +1.6
Assists & Self-Creation 3.1 AST/g + self-creation = +1.6
Turnovers -3.7
Turnovers 1.6/g (live + dead blend) = -3.7
Defense +1.7
Steals 1.2/g = +2.8
Blocks 0.7/g = +0.6
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.7
Hustle & Effort +9.5
Rebounds 9.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +6.2
Contested Shots 6.1/g = +1.2
Deflections 2.2/g = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 1.1/g = +0.3
Raw Impact +25.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.3
Net Impact
+15.5
94th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 92th
19.9 PPG
Efficiency 21th
54.9% TS
Playmaking 87th
3.1 APG
Rebounding 88th
9.9 RPG
Defense 94th
+11.0/g
Hustle 94th
+26.7/g
Creation 99th
+8.74/g
Shot Making 99th
+11.24/g
TO Discipline 46th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Bam Adebayo’s first twenty-five games were defined by a radical, unapologetic perimeter experiment. During a massive performance on 12/02 vs LAC, he drained five three-pointers en route to 27 points and 14 rebounds. He generated a staggering +36.1 Impact score by combining this newfound floor spacing with his usual defensive dominance. Even when his jumper completely abandoned him, as it did on 12/19 vs BKN, he still salvaged a +7.7 Impact score despite scoring just eight points. His value on those ugly shooting nights remained positive entirely because of relentless hustle on the glass—grabbing 17 rebounds against Brooklyn—and his switchable defensive versatility. However, the aggressive shot diet occasionally backfired, most notably during a disastrous eight-minute stint on 11/06 vs DEN. He forced terrible shots, bricked both of his deep attempts, and looked completely disjointed on both ends of the floor, resulting in a brutal -12.3 Impact score.

Bam Adebayo’s middle stretch of the season was defined by a radical, albeit erratic, perimeter evolution. Early on, his jumper was broken but his relentless hustle kept him afloat. Look at his 01/02 vs DET performance, where he managed just 15 points on a dismal 5-for-14 from the floor but still posted a +20.6 Impact by vacuuming up 14 rebounds and anchoring the paint defensively. Soon after, the three-point barrage began. During a blistering 01/18 vs OKC matchup, Adebayo erupted for 30 points and 12 rebounds, draining an absurd six triples to generate a monstrous +33.2 Impact score. The newfound green light came with severe growing pains, however. Just two days later on 01/20 vs GSW, his jumper abandoned him entirely as he clanked his way to 4 points on 1-for-13 shooting, dragging his Impact down to -2.2 due to the sheer volume of wasted offensive possessions. Even with the occasional shooting disaster, his rebounding and defensive versatility made this experimental phase a massive net positive.

This late-season stretch was defined by an utterly surreal offensive metamorphosis that temporarily turned a defensive anchor into a high-volume gunner. The absolute peak of this fever dream arrived on 03/10 vs WAS. Adebayo hijacked the offense to drop a staggering 83 points on 43 shot attempts, earning a massive +72.6 Impact score through sheer scoring volume and an absurd willingness to launch 22 three-pointers. Yet, even when his newfound jumper violently abandoned him, he found ways to dominate the margins. On 03/27 vs CLE, he shot a miserable 3-for-14 from the floor but still posted a +16.0 Impact score by vacuuming up 16 rebounds and strangling the opposition with relentless defensive effort. His insistence on playing like a perimeter guard did occasionally punish the team. During a dismal outing on 04/07 vs TOR, Adebayo forced seven awful looks from beyond the arc to finish with just 7 points, and that horrific shot selection ultimately dragged his Impact down to -0.3 for the night.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Adebayo posts positive impact in 92% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~10 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 47% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Adebayo consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +12.9, second-half: +18.1. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 34 games. Longest cold streak: 1 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 70 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

W. Carter Jr. 236.7 poss
FG% 44.7%
3P% 9.1%
PPP 0.19
PTS 46
N. Vučević 108.6 poss
FG% 48.6%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.42
PTS 46
I. Stewart 94.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 11
N. Claxton 75.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 16
M. Williams 74.9 poss
FG% 57.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 35
C. Holmgren 72.8 poss
FG% 47.1%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 20
P. Williams 71.2 poss
FG% 31.6%
3P% 12.5%
PPP 0.2
PTS 14
I. Zubac 70.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 32
J. Embiid 70.4 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 24
R. Gobert 65.8 poss
FG% 31.2%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 12

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

W. Carter Jr. 167.4 poss
FG% 63.2%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.17
PTS 29
P. Banchero 81.5 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 19
N. Vučević 80.3 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 5
N. Claxton 78.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
K. Towns 77.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.06
PTS 5
M. Williams 75.1 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 13
I. Stewart 74.9 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
I. Zubac 73.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
V. Wembanyama 70.6 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.34
PTS 24
C. Holmgren 65.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

74
Games
19.9
PPG
9.9
RPG
3.1
APG
1.2
SPG
0.7
BPG
44.3
FG%
31.8
3P%
77.8
FT%
32.1
MPG

GAME LOG

74 games played