Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
CLE lead TOR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter below to isolate their shots
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 166 attempts

TOR TOR Shot-making Δ

Barnes 11/19 +1.6
Ingram 3/15 -8.5
Barrett Open 10/13 +3.4
Murray-Boyles Open 6/10 -0.3
Walter Hard 5/9 +2.7
Mamukelashvili 5/8 +1.7
Shead Hard 1/5 -1.9
Poeltl Open 1/2 -0.3
Lawson 0/2 -2.1

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell Hard 13/23 +6.8
Harden Hard 9/14 +6.6
Mobley Open 11/13 +5.9
Allen Open 4/6 +1.2
Merrill Hard 2/6 -1.9
Strus Hard 2/5 +0.3
Schröder 1/5 -3.9
Tyson 1/4 -1.5
Ellis Hard 0/4 -4.4
Wade Hard 1/3 -0.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
TOR
CLE
42/83 Field Goals 44/83
50.6% Field Goal % 53.0%
7/26 3-Pointers 13/40
26.9% 3-Point % 32.5%
14/17 Free Throws 14/22
82.4% Free Throw % 63.6%
58.0% True Shooting % 62.0%
49 Total Rebounds 43
12 Offensive 8
30 Defensive 27
23 Assists 22
1.05 Assist/TO Ratio 1.57
22 Turnovers 12
8 Steals 13
3 Blocks 5
24 Fouls 20
64 Points in Paint 52
16 Fast Break Pts 2
19 Points off TOs 22
19 Second Chance Pts 10
45 Bench Points 19
0 Largest Lead 16
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Donovan Mitchell
30 PTS · 7 REB · 5 AST · 37.0 MIN
+26.21
2
James Harden
28 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 34.9 MIN
+25.28
3
Evan Mobley
25 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 33.4 MIN
+24.37
4
Scottie Barnes
26 PTS · 4 REB · 5 AST · 39.6 MIN
+17.82
5
RJ Barrett
22 PTS · 9 REB · 5 AST · 37.7 MIN
+17.06
6
Collin Murray-Boyles
17 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 25.9 MIN
+16.96
7
Jarrett Allen
10 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 25.2 MIN
+14.38
8
Sandro Mamukelashvili
12 PTS · 10 REB · 2 AST · 20.5 MIN
+11.51
9
Ja'Kobe Walter
14 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 28.0 MIN
+10.15
10
Dean Wade
3 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 28.5 MIN
+6.33
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 R. Barrett driving Layup (22 PTS) 105–115
Q4 0:08 S. Mamukelashvili REBOUND (Off:3 Def:7) 103–115
Q4 0:10 MISS J. Harden Free Throw 2 of 2 103–115
Q4 0:10 J. Harden Free Throw 1 of 2 (28 PTS) 103–115
Q4 0:10 S. Barnes personal FOUL (4 PF) (Harden 2 FT) 103–114
Q4 0:16 J. Harden REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 103–114
Q4 0:19 MISS S. Barnes driving Layup 103–114
Q4 0:25 D. Schröder Free Throw 2 of 2 (5 PTS) 103–114
Q4 0:25 D. Schröder Free Throw 1 of 2 (4 PTS) 103–113
Q4 0:25 J. Shead personal FOUL (5 PF) (Schröder 2 FT) 103–112
Q4 0:27 S. Barnes driving DUNK (26 PTS) 103–112
Q4 0:32 J. Harden Free Throw 2 of 2 (27 PTS) 101–112
Q4 0:32 J. Harden Free Throw 1 of 2 (26 PTS) 101–111
Q4 0:32 J. Shead personal FOUL (4 PF) (Harden 2 FT) 101–110
Q4 0:37 C. Murray-Boyles cutting DUNK (17 PTS) (B. Ingram 3 AST) 101–110

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
30
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+28.8

Relentless shot creation and high-volume scoring fueled a massive +25.2 Offense credit, pouring in 30 points on efficient 13-of-23 shooting. He supplemented his scoring barrage with excellent work on the glass (7 rebounds) and sharp playmaking (5 assists) while committing just 1 turnover. His ability to dictate the offense without bleeding value on the margins made this a masterclass in lead-guard execution.

Shooting
FG 13/23 (56.5%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.0%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg +13.0
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +22.2
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +8.3
Hustle +7.9
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S James Harden 34.9m
28
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+20.3

A stunning display of defensive anticipation defined his night, racking up 5 steals (avg 1.2) to generate an enormous +12.4 Defense credit. He was equally lethal on the other end, scoring 28 points on hyper-efficient 9-of-14 shooting to post a +15.1 Offense credit. While his 5 turnovers and diminished assist totals (4, avg 7.7) showed some sloppiness, his two-way dominance completely overpowered those flaws.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 7/10 (70.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 28.8%
Net Rtg +17.8
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +22.5
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense +10.8
Turnovers -12.6
STL 5
BLK 1
TO 5
S Evan Mobley 33.4m
25
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+19.7

Absolute interior dominance drove a staggering +24.6 Offense credit, as he torched the defense with 25 points on blistering 11-of-13 shooting. He operated with ruthless efficiency, capitalizing on every touch while keeping mistakes to a minimum (1 turnover). Though his rebounding (8 boards) and playmaking (2 assists) were slightly below his lofty standards, his unstoppable scoring carried the night.

Shooting
FG 11/13 (84.6%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 87.3%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +2.6
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +22.8
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +8.2
Defense -4.2
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Dean Wade 28.4m
3
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.1

Defensive disruption defined his 28 minutes, generating a strong +4.0 Defense credit fueled by 2 steals (avg 0.6) and active rebounding (5 boards). However, his offensive passivity severely limited his overall value, managing just 3 points on 3 shot attempts. While he thrived doing the dirty work, his inability to stretch the floor kept his +2.3 Offense credit muted.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 6.2%
Net Rtg +23.7
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +4.4
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jarrett Allen 25.2m
10
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.8

Elite rim protection and defensive activity anchored his performance, racking up 3 blocks and 2 steals to drive a massive +7.5 Defense credit. While his rebounding volume cratered (3 boards, avg 8.5), he remained highly efficient on the other end, converting 4-of-6 shots for a +7.8 Offense credit. His low-usage, high-impact presence set the tone for the frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +34.6
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 0
Max Strus 26.6m
6
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.1

Extreme offensive passivity defined his 26 minutes, attempting just 5 shots to finish with 6 points (avg 12.2). Despite knocking down a pair of threes, his low volume limited him to a modest +3.0 Offense credit. A slight bump in playmaking (3 assists) wasn't enough to offset his lack of scoring aggression and a minor -0.6 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -9.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Sam Merrill 20.4m
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.5

A frigid perimeter shooting night completely neutralized his value, as he managed just 5 points while clanking 4 of his 5 three-point attempts. This lack of spacing gravity resulted in a negative -0.7 Offense credit, severely limiting his impact off the bench. While he chipped in slightly on the other end (+1.1 Defense credit), his inability to find the bottom of the net defined his struggles.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.8%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg -2.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.3

Poor shot-making plagued his brief 13-minute stint, as he converted just 1 of his 5 field goal attempts to finish with 5 points. He managed to salvage a +4.3 Offense credit by taking care of the basketball (0 turnovers) and dishing out 4 assists. However, his inability to apply scoring pressure kept him from making a significant positive impact, highlighted by a meager +0.3 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.6%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaylon Tyson 11.7m
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.4

An inability to find a rhythm offensively severely limited his effectiveness, scoring just 3 points on 1-of-4 shooting. His struggles extended to the other end of the floor, where defensive lapses resulted in a -1.9 Defense credit. With minimal peripheral contributions, he failed to leave a positive mark during his 11 minutes of action, posting a +0.4 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -8.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Keon Ellis 8.8m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.6

A catastrophic shooting performance completely tanked his offensive value, missing all 4 of his three-point attempts to finish scoreless (-5.5 Offense credit). He managed to salvage some utility through aggressive perimeter defense, swiping 2 steals to earn a +3.1 Defense credit. However, his total offensive invisibility made him a net negative during his time on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.8m
Scoring -3.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
TOR Toronto Raptors
S Scottie Barnes 39.6m
26
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
+13.8

Aggressive rim pressure and efficient finishing (11-of-19 FG) powered a massive +15.3 Offense credit. He embraced a scorer's mentality to pour in 26 points (avg 15.9), though it came at the expense of his usual playmaking (5 assists, avg 8.7). His +3.4 Defense credit highlights a solid two-way effort, even if 4 turnovers slightly dampened his overall efficiency.

Shooting
FG 11/19 (57.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.6%
USG% 26.7%
Net Rtg -18.0
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.6m
Scoring +19.2
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +3.1
Defense +2.8
Turnovers -8.2
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S RJ Barrett 37.7m
22
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+15.9

Elite interior finishing drove a massive +19.8 Offense credit, as he carved up the defense on blistering 10-of-13 shooting. He supplemented his 22 points with excellent work on the glass (9 rebounds) and solid playmaking (5 assists). However, his impact was dragged down by 4 turnovers and defensive lapses (-2.2 Defense credit) that kept his overall value in check.

Shooting
FG 10/13 (76.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -8.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.7m
Scoring +19.9
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +11.4
Defense -2.8
Turnovers -8.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Jamal Shead 37.6m
3
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-11.8

An inability to generate efficient offense (-4.3 Offense credit) sabotaged his extended run, as he clanked his way to 3 points on 1-of-5 shooting. While his perimeter pressure yielded a +2.6 Defense credit and 2 steals, his playmaking completely dried up (4 assists vs avg 6.6). The combination of poor shot-making and 3 turnovers ultimately made him a significant negative on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +4.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.6m
Scoring -0.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +3.7
Turnovers -7.1
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
S Brandon Ingram 35.9m
7
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-20.7

A severe drop-off in scoring efficiency (-10.8 Offense credit) completely derailed his night, as he managed just 7 points on a frigid 3-of-15 shooting. His struggles were compounded by sloppy decision-making, yielding 5 turnovers (avg 2.1) that actively harmed the offense. Despite a slight defensive bump (+2.0 Defense credit), his inability to find the bottom of the net defined this massive step back from his recent hot streak.

Shooting
FG 3/15 (20.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 23.3%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -20.3
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.9m
Scoring -2.3
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -12.6
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jakob Poeltl 9.4m
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.1

Extreme passivity defined his brief 9-minute stint, snapping his 12-game streak of 50%+ shooting volume with just two field goal attempts. He generated virtually no value on either end, posting a flat +0.3 Offense credit while turning the ball over twice (avg 1.1). His inability to assert himself inside rendered him a non-factor before exiting early.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -35.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.4m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.5
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
14
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.8

Crisp perimeter shot-making fueled his +9.3 Offense credit, knocking down 3-of-7 from deep to tally an efficient 14 points. He operated strictly as a play-finisher, logging minimal peripheral stats (1 rebound, 1 assist) while keeping mistakes low. A positive +1.1 Defense credit shows he held his own on the other end, cementing a solid two-way rotational shift.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.2%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -6.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +10.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
17
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+13.1

Bully-ball finishing and frequent trips to the foul line (5-of-6 FT) powered a robust +15.1 Offense credit. He thoroughly outworked his matchups inside, pairing his 17 points with 7 rebounds to control the paint. A solid +3.2 Defense credit confirms he was just as disruptive on the other end, putting together a complete two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 67.2%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -11.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +7.9
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
12
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.6

Relentless work on the glass defined his performance, nearly doubling his season average to grab 10 rebounds while anchoring the interior. He paired this rebounding surge with highly efficient scoring (5-of-8 FG), driving a strong +9.8 Offense credit. His +2.1 Defense credit further highlights a well-rounded, high-energy shift off the bench.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +18.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +12.7
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -5.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.0

Relegated to a brief 5-minute cameo, he failed to find any rhythm from the floor, missing both of his field goal attempts. His only production came from a pair of free throws, resulting in a marginal +1.3 Offense credit. He was essentially a ghost on the court, recording zeroes across almost all peripheral categories to post a neutral +0.0 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -6.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.3m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0