GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Peyton Watson 39.2m
19
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
-2.8

High-level defensive versatility and weak-side help kept him relevant on the floor. Unfortunately, forcing the issue in isolation sets led to clunky offensive possessions that dragged his overall score into the negative.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.8%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg +6.8
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Offense +8.1
Hustle +2.6
Defense +5.4
Raw total +16.1
Avg player in 39.2m -18.9
Impact -2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 47.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
S Jalen Pickett 36.8m
13
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.9

Pounding the air out of the ball stalled the half-court offense and led to low-quality looks at the end of the shot clock. Even with solid rebounding from the guard spot, his inability to initiate clean sets cratered his net score.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -14.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Offense +7.8
Hustle +1.4
Defense +1.7
Raw total +10.9
Avg player in 36.8m -17.8
Impact -6.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Aaron Gordon 31.7m
23
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.4

Bullied smaller defenders in the dunker spot to generate a massive offensive spike. His defensive rating was surprisingly muted, likely due to late closeouts on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 7/9 (77.8%)
Advanced
TS% 57.6%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -16.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.7m
Offense +18.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.9
Raw total +21.7
Avg player in 31.7m -15.3
Impact +6.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Spencer Jones 24.7m
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

Appalling shot selection from beyond the arc completely derailed the offense during his minutes. While he showed flashes of energy in transition, the sheer volume of clanked threes was insurmountable.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -29.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Offense -1.0
Hustle +3.0
Defense +0.4
Raw total +2.4
Avg player in 24.7m -12.0
Impact -9.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Hunter Tyson 12.5m
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.7

Struggled to find the pace of the game, looking lost during offensive sets. Bleeding points in transition defense ultimately pushed his brief stint firmly into the negative.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -51.5
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.5m
Offense +0.4
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.6
Raw total +1.4
Avg player in 12.5m -6.1
Impact -4.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
25
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+9.9

Elite catch-and-shoot gravity warped the defensive shell, opening up driving lanes for everyone else. He compounded this offensive explosion with surprisingly disciplined closeouts on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.0%
USG% 18.1%
Net Rtg +38.0
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Offense +18.6
Hustle +3.4
Defense +4.9
Raw total +26.9
Avg player in 35.2m -17.0
Impact +9.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Zeke Nnaji 27.7m
14
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+14.6

Anchored the paint with absolute authority, deterring drives and dominating the glass. This interior physicality sparked a massive turnaround from his recent struggles, driving an elite two-way rating.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +42.9
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.7m
Offense +15.7
Hustle +2.8
Defense +9.6
Raw total +28.1
Avg player in 27.7m -13.5
Impact +14.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
Bruce Brown 24.4m
7
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.3

Snapped a highly efficient hot streak with a disjointed offensive performance filled with forced floaters. He managed to avoid a total disaster class by relying on his trademark point-of-attack defensive pressure.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 36.3%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +35.2
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Offense +4.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.1
Raw total +8.5
Avg player in 24.4m -11.8
Impact -3.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.6

Offered zero resistance on the perimeter during a brief, highly ineffective stint. His inability to stay attached to shooters immediately forced the coaching staff to pull the plug.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg +26.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Offense -0.8
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total -0.8
Avg player in 7.8m -3.8
Impact -4.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MIL Milwaukee Bucks
10
pts
9
reb
7
ast
Impact
-3.7

A brutal night of forcing contested jumpers tanked his offensive value entirely. He salvaged his overall rating purely through high-motor defensive rotations and relentless pursuit of loose balls.

Shooting
FG 4/17 (23.5%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.7%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -8.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Offense -0.7
Hustle +5.0
Defense +10.3
Raw total +14.6
Avg player in 38.1m -18.3
Impact -3.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S AJ Green 36.8m
14
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.5

Elite perimeter spacing was entirely undone by defensive breakdowns and costly live-ball turnovers. His inability to stay in front of drives negated the value of his spot-up gravity.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 87.5%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Offense +11.7
Hustle +2.0
Defense +0.6
Raw total +14.3
Avg player in 36.8m -17.8
Impact -3.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ryan Rollins 35.0m
2
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-13.3

An absolute cratering of offensive efficiency defined this outing, with forced shots short-circuiting the team's rhythm. Despite active hands on defense, the sheer volume of empty offensive possessions proved too costly.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 11.1%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +10.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Offense -5.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +6.2
Raw total +3.6
Avg player in 35.0m -16.9
Impact -13.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 23.1%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
31
pts
8
reb
11
ast
Impact
+19.9

Relentless downhill pressure collapsed the defense on every possession, driving an elite overall rating. His weak-side rim protection effectively shut off the opponent's interior passing lanes.

Shooting
FG 10/17 (58.8%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 10/14 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 66.9%
USG% 33.8%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Offense +24.8
Hustle +4.0
Defense +7.1
Raw total +35.9
Avg player in 33.0m -16.0
Impact +19.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Myles Turner 24.2m
16
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.4

Pick-and-pop spacing stretched the floor beautifully, fueling a massive offensive surge compared to his recent slump. However, getting bullied on the glass and in drop coverage dragged his defensive metrics into the red.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.0%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg -8.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Offense +16.4
Hustle +1.8
Defense -1.1
Raw total +17.1
Avg player in 24.2m -11.7
Impact +5.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 52.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Kyle Kuzma 26.5m
11
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.5

Settled for heavily contested midrange fadeaways instead of moving the ball within the flow of the offense. The lack of secondary playmaking meant his empty scoring volume actively hurt the team's efficiency.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.9%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -32.5
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Offense +6.4
Hustle +0.4
Defense +1.5
Raw total +8.3
Avg player in 26.5m -12.8
Impact -4.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Bobby Portis 16.7m
14
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.3

Provided an immediate scoring punch against second-unit bigs, exploiting mismatches in the post. The lack of passing out of double teams capped his ceiling, but the sheer scoring gravity was a net positive.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 77.8%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -12.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Offense +11.7
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.5
Raw total +13.4
Avg player in 16.7m -8.1
Impact +5.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Gary Harris 15.0m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.3

Flawless shot selection and opportunistic cuts maximized his limited touches perfectly. He paired that offensive efficiency with textbook point-of-attack defense to generate a highly positive two-way stint.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg -37.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.0m
Offense +6.8
Hustle +1.1
Defense +3.7
Raw total +11.6
Avg player in 15.0m -7.3
Impact +4.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.1

Completely invisible during his stint, offering zero offensive gravity or off-ball movement. His failure to navigate screens on the other end compounded the negative impact.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg -70.0
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.7m
Offense -0.8
Hustle +0.2
Defense -1.5
Raw total -2.1
Avg player in 14.7m -7.0
Impact -9.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0