Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DEN lead MIL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MIL 2P — 3P —
DEN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 172 attempts

MIL MIL Shot-making Δ

Antetokounmpo 10/17 +1.6
Porter Jr. 4/17 -8.9
Kuzma 5/13 -1.7
Portis 6/9 +4.4
Rollins Hard 1/9 -7.3
Green Hard 5/8 +5.9
Turner 5/8 +4.7
Harris Hard 2/2 +3.8
Trent Jr. Hard 0/2 -2.0

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Watson 7/19 -1.4
Gordon Hard 7/16 +1.3
Pickett 5/13 -1.3
Hardaway Jr. Hard 8/12 +8.8
Nnaji 5/9 -0.5
Jones Hard 2/9 -4.4
Brown 1/7 -4.9
Strawther Hard 0/1 -0.8
Tyson Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MIL
DEN
38/85 Field Goals 35/87
44.7% Field Goal % 40.2%
14/34 3-Pointers 14/35
41.2% 3-Point % 40.0%
14/20 Free Throws 24/31
70.0% Free Throw % 77.4%
55.4% True Shooting % 53.7%
55 Total Rebounds 57
10 Offensive 10
34 Defensive 35
29 Assists 23
2.64 Assist/TO Ratio 2.56
9 Turnovers 7
5 Steals 5
6 Blocks 5
19 Fouls 15
38 Points in Paint 30
14 Fast Break Pts 8
10 Points off TOs 7
9 Second Chance Pts 7
31 Bench Points 46
7 Largest Lead 15
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Giannis Antetokounmpo
31 PTS · 8 REB · 11 AST · 33.0 MIN
+28.15
2
Tim Hardaway Jr.
25 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 35.2 MIN
+22.25
3
Zeke Nnaji
14 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 27.7 MIN
+20.03
4
Aaron Gordon
23 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 31.7 MIN
+18.74
5
Myles Turner
16 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 24.2 MIN
+13.95
6
Bobby Portis
14 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 16.7 MIN
+10.9
7
Peyton Watson
19 PTS · 8 REB · 6 AST · 39.2 MIN
+10.19
8
AJ Green
14 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 36.8 MIN
+9.93
9
Jalen Pickett
13 PTS · 8 REB · 4 AST · 36.8 MIN
+9.12
10
Gary Harris
6 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 15.0 MIN
+8.95
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 104–108
Q4 0:01 MISS K. Porter Jr. tip Layup 104–108
Q4 0:02 K. Porter Jr. REBOUND (Off:3 Def:6) 104–108
Q4 0:03 MISS G. Antetokounmpo 27' pullup 3PT 104–108
Q4 0:04 A. Gordon Free Throw 2 of 2 (23 PTS) 104–108
Q4 0:04 A. Gordon Free Throw 1 of 2 (22 PTS) 104–107
Q4 0:04 K. Kuzma take personal FOUL (1 PF) (Gordon 2 FT) 104–106
Q4 0:05 K. Kuzma driving Layup (11 PTS) 104–106
Q4 0:09 A. Gordon Free Throw 2 of 2 (21 PTS) 102–106
Q4 0:09 TEAM offensive REBOUND 102–105
Q4 0:09 MISS A. Gordon Free Throw 1 of 2 102–105
Q4 0:09 A. Green personal FOUL (4 PF) (Gordon 2 FT) 102–105
Q4 0:11 A. Gordon REBOUND (Off:2 Def:4) 102–105
Q4 0:12 MISS R. Rollins 3PT 102–105
Q4 0:15 K. Porter Jr. REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 102–105

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Peyton Watson 39.2m
19
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+7.2

High-level defensive versatility and weak-side help kept him relevant on the floor. Unfortunately, forcing the issue in isolation sets led to clunky offensive possessions that dragged his overall score into the negative.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.8%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg +6.8
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +10.2
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 47.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
S Jalen Pickett 36.8m
13
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.4

Pounding the air out of the ball stalled the half-court offense and led to low-quality looks at the end of the shot clock. Even with solid rebounding from the guard spot, his inability to initiate clean sets cratered his net score.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -14.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Aaron Gordon 31.7m
23
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+17.2

Bullied smaller defenders in the dunker spot to generate a massive offensive spike. His defensive rating was surprisingly muted, likely due to late closeouts on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 7/9 (77.8%)
Advanced
TS% 57.6%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -16.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.7m
Scoring +16.1
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Spencer Jones 24.7m
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.5

Appalling shot selection from beyond the arc completely derailed the offense during his minutes. While he showed flashes of energy in transition, the sheer volume of clanked threes was insurmountable.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -29.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Hunter Tyson 12.5m
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.2

Struggled to find the pace of the game, looking lost during offensive sets. Bleeding points in transition defense ultimately pushed his brief stint firmly into the negative.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -51.5
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.5m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
25
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+18.7

Elite catch-and-shoot gravity warped the defensive shell, opening up driving lanes for everyone else. He compounded this offensive explosion with surprisingly disciplined closeouts on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.0%
USG% 18.1%
Net Rtg +38.0
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +21.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Zeke Nnaji 27.7m
14
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+16.0

Anchored the paint with absolute authority, deterring drives and dominating the glass. This interior physicality sparked a massive turnaround from his recent struggles, driving an elite two-way rating.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +42.9
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.7m
Scoring +10.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +12.7
Defense +3.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
Bruce Brown 24.4m
7
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.0

Snapped a highly efficient hot streak with a disjointed offensive performance filled with forced floaters. He managed to avoid a total disaster class by relying on his trademark point-of-attack defensive pressure.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 36.3%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +35.2
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.8

Offered zero resistance on the perimeter during a brief, highly ineffective stint. His inability to stay attached to shooters immediately forced the coaching staff to pull the plug.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg +26.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MIL Milwaukee Bucks
10
pts
9
reb
7
ast
Impact
-5.0

A brutal night of forcing contested jumpers tanked his offensive value entirely. He salvaged his overall rating purely through high-motor defensive rotations and relentless pursuit of loose balls.

Shooting
FG 4/17 (23.5%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.7%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -8.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +6.6
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S AJ Green 36.8m
14
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.8

Elite perimeter spacing was entirely undone by defensive breakdowns and costly live-ball turnovers. His inability to stay in front of drives negated the value of his spot-up gravity.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 87.5%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ryan Rollins 35.0m
2
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-12.6

An absolute cratering of offensive efficiency defined this outing, with forced shots short-circuiting the team's rhythm. Despite active hands on defense, the sheer volume of empty offensive possessions proved too costly.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 11.1%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +10.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Scoring -4.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 23.1%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
31
pts
8
reb
11
ast
Impact
+22.8

Relentless downhill pressure collapsed the defense on every possession, driving an elite overall rating. His weak-side rim protection effectively shut off the opponent's interior passing lanes.

Shooting
FG 10/17 (58.8%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 10/14 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 66.9%
USG% 33.8%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring +23.4
Creation +3.5
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +5.3
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Myles Turner 24.2m
16
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.7

Pick-and-pop spacing stretched the floor beautifully, fueling a massive offensive surge compared to his recent slump. However, getting bullied on the glass and in drop coverage dragged his defensive metrics into the red.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.0%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg -8.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +13.4
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +4.4
Defense -6.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 52.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Kyle Kuzma 26.5m
11
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.4

Settled for heavily contested midrange fadeaways instead of moving the ball within the flow of the offense. The lack of secondary playmaking meant his empty scoring volume actively hurt the team's efficiency.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.9%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -32.5
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +4.7
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Bobby Portis 16.7m
14
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.0

Provided an immediate scoring punch against second-unit bigs, exploiting mismatches in the post. The lack of passing out of double teams capped his ceiling, but the sheer scoring gravity was a net positive.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 77.8%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -12.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring +12.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense -4.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Gary Harris 15.0m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.6

Flawless shot selection and opportunistic cuts maximized his limited touches perfectly. He paired that offensive efficiency with textbook point-of-attack defense to generate a highly positive two-way stint.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg -37.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.0m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-17.5

Completely invisible during his stint, offering zero offensive gravity or off-ball movement. His failure to navigate screens on the other end compounded the negative impact.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg -70.0
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.7m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0