MEM

2025-26 Season

CAM SPENCER

Memphis Grizzlies | Guard | 6-3
Cam Spencer
11.1PPG
2.5RPG
5.6APG
23.8MPG
+1.6 Impact

Spencer produces at an above average rate for a 24-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.6
Scoring +10.9
Points Scored 11.1 PPG = +11.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.8
Creation +1.1
Assists & Self-Creation 5.6 AST/g + self-creation = +1.1
Turnovers -3.0
Turnovers 1.3/g (live + dead blend) = -3.0
Defense +0.5
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.3
Hustle & Effort +1.7
Rebounds 2.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.1
Contested Shots 1.9/g = +0.4
Deflections 1.5/g = +1.0
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +11.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.6
Net Impact
+1.6
67th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 59th
11.1 PPG
Efficiency 99th
65.1% TS
Playmaking 88th
5.6 APG
Rebounding 41th
2.5 RPG
Defense 54th
+7.6/g
Hustle 47th
+8.9/g
Creation 66th
+3.30/g
Shot Making 65th
+7.58/g
TO Discipline 53th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Cam Spencer spent the first quarter of the season carving out a reputation as a wildly volatile sparkplug. When his jumper was falling, he looked like a massive steal, but his overall effectiveness fluctuated heavily depending on his defensive engagement. Look at the 12/01 vs SAC matchup, where he poured in 16 points on blistering 4-for-5 shooting from deep. Despite that offensive output, he posted a -2.5 Impact score because hidden costs like blown defensive rotations and giving up easy transition buckets entirely negated his hot hand. Just two days later on 12/03 vs SAS, he flipped the script entirely. He racked up 21 points and six assists on highly efficient 6-of-8 shooting, registering a massive +15.7 Impact by pairing his scoring with crisp, mistake-free playmaking. He even found ways to drive winning basketball on low-scoring nights when his perimeter shot abandoned him, as seen on 12/07 vs POR. Though he managed a modest 12 points in 32 minutes, he still posted a +4.8 Impact by grinding out defensive stops and setting up teammates with six crucial assists.

Cam Spencer’s mid-season stretch was a chaotic pendulum swing between nuclear bench scoring and overextended playmaking. He was utterly lethal as a reserve. On 12/16 vs LAC, he caught fire to the tune of 27 points on 7-of-10 shooting from deep, generating a massive +23.9 Impact score because his elite shot selection bent the entire defense. But when thrust into the starting lineup, the burden of running an offense often overwhelmed him. Look no further than his start on 01/05 vs LAL. He dished out nine assists, yet posted a dismal -15.0 Impact score because his atrocious 1-for-10 shooting completely stalled the half-court attack. He quickly recalibrated on 01/07 vs SAS with a brilliant 21-point, eight-rebound, eight-assist performance that yielded a +23.6 Impact score as he finally balanced his passing with high-percentage scoring.

Cam Spencer spent this stretch of the season as the ultimate wildcard, oscillating wildly between lethal perimeter sniper and complete offensive zero. When his jumper was falling, he was unstoppable, dropping 25 points on 9-of-16 shooting to post a staggering +21.8 Impact during the 02/27 vs DAL matchup. Yet those peaks were matched by agonizing valleys, like his completely invisible 0-for-5 shooting night on 02/21 vs MIA that resulted in a brutal -13.9 Impact score. Without his outside shot falling to stretch the floor, his lack of physical burst made him a liability who simply clogged the half-court offense. Even when he shifted his focus to pure playmaking, the underlying numbers rarely forgave his flaws. On 04/06 vs CLE, Spencer dished out nine assists and hit 3-of-5 shots, but still dragged the team down with a -7.2 Impact. That negative score despite the slick passing reveals the hidden costs of his game, as severe defensive lapses against quicker guards erased every single point he generated.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Spencer's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Spencer doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 7 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 72 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. Camara 55.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
A. Thompson 51.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
A. Mitchell 45.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
C. Gillespie 42.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
H. Jones 42.7 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 14
K. Dunn 39.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
I. Collier 35.5 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 15
A. Black 34.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 9
S. Castle 34.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
C. Wallace 33.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

H. Jones 59.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Champagnie 54.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
N. Clifford 51.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
T. Camara 51.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
B. Brown 48.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Dunn 47.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
C. Gillespie 44.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
J. McDaniels 43.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 11
I. Joe 37.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
T. Eason 35.9 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 16

SEASON STATS

72
Games
11.1
PPG
2.5
RPG
5.6
APG
0.7
SPG
0.2
BPG
47.3
FG%
44.9
3P%
94.0
FT%
23.8
MPG

GAME LOG

72 games played