GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S De'Aaron Fox 33.3m
24
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+9.8

A masterful display of difficult shot conversion (+6.1 ShotMaking) and flawless ball security (+0.0 TO) anchored his high-level offensive orchestration. His downhill scoring gravity (+14.5) consistently collapsed the defense, even if his own defensive effort (-2.6) left much to be desired. This performance highlighted his ability to carry the scoring load through sheer individual brilliance.

Shooting
FG 8/21 (38.1%)
3PT 4/14 (28.6%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.7%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg -0.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Scoring +14.5
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +1.8
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Devin Vassell 33.1m
19
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.3

Elite two-way execution (+14.3 Scoring, +3.2 Defense) drove this performance, though it was heavily mitigated by catastrophic ball security. The severe turnover penalty (-7.1) shows his decision-making as a primary creator remains a glaring weakness. Still, his ability to hit tough, contested jumpers (+3.8 ShotMaking) kept the offense afloat during stagnant stretches.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.4%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +3.1
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Stephon Castle 29.4m
10
pts
11
reb
9
ast
Impact
+0.3

Exceptional rebounding from the guard position (+8.2 Hustle) salvaged an otherwise sloppy offensive orchestration. Severe turnover damage (-4.7) heavily penalized his playmaking efforts, neutralizing his solid shot-making (+2.2) and scoring output. This outing encapsulates his ongoing struggle to balance aggressive downhill attacks with secure ball handling.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.5%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -22.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +8.2
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
7
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.8

A frustrating lack of offensive gravity and costly giveaways (-2.4 Turnovers) derailed his effectiveness on the wing. He failed to generate meaningful looks for others (+0.2 Creation) and struggled to contain his matchups on the other end (-1.1 Defense). This passive disappearing act highlights his extreme volatility as a boom-or-bust spacing weapon.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -35.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.3m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.2
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Mason Plumlee 15.8m
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

Solid activity on the glass (+3.8 Hustle) was completely overshadowed by his total lack of offensive utility. Operating strictly as a space-eater, he provided zero creation value (+0.0) and minimal scoring gravity (+2.0). His inability to impact the game beyond basic rebounding makes him a difficult fit in modern offensive alignments.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 2.6%
Net Rtg -13.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+0.6

A sudden scoring burst (+6.9) and active rebounding (+5.4 Hustle) allowed him to break out of a prolonged offensive slump. The impact of his tough shot-making (+2.4) was nearly erased by sloppy ball security (-2.4 Turnovers) and poor defensive positioning (-1.0). This chaotic, high-variance showing is typical of his erratic end-of-bench production.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 17.7%
Net Rtg +1.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 1
12
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.1

Disciplined defensive execution (+2.4) and efficient shot-making (+3.4) provided steady, veteran stability. He operated strictly as a finisher, offering zero playmaking value (+0.0 Creation) but avoiding any costly mistakes (+0.0 TO). This performance reflects his transition into a highly specialized, low-usage role where he picks his spots carefully.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg -7.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
18
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.3

Relentless bully-ball tactics fueled a strong scoring output (+11.9) and excellent activity on the glass (+6.7 Hustle). However, glaring defensive lapses (-3.7) and occasional tunnel vision (-2.4 Turnovers) prevented this from being a truly dominant outing. His ability to convert tough looks (+3.9 ShotMaking) ultimately outweighed his detrimental mistakes on the other end.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg +18.2
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +11.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.7
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Dylan Harper 18.4m
9
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.3

Steady defensive execution (+1.8) and solid rebounding (+3.8 Hustle) kept his impact in the green despite a quiet scoring night. He managed the game flawlessly without committing a single turnover (+0.0 TO), offsetting his minimal playmaking output (+0.9 Creation). This was a mature, low-mistake performance that provided crucial stability to the second unit.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.7%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg -31.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.0

A disastrously empty stint was defined by costly turnovers (-2.4) and a complete lack of physical presence. He offered virtually no resistance or activity on the boards (+0.3 Hustle), rendering his minutes highly detrimental. This performance perfectly illustrates his severe offensive limitations and inability to anchor the paint.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -120.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.2

Relegated to a microscopic rotational stint, his severe lack of playmaking (+0.0 Creation) and defensive presence (+0.0) resulted in a deeply negative overall impact. Although he managed a tiny bump in hustle (+1.3), his inability to generate meaningful offensive gravity (+2.0 Scoring) rendered his minutes highly ineffective. This fleeting appearance perfectly illustrates his struggles to impact the game during brief cameos.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +150.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
25
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.4

An explosive offensive eruption (+17.3 Scoring) was nearly derailed by catastrophic ball security. Turnover damage (-7.8) severely undercut his value, though a strong shot-making bonus (+5.7) highlights his ability to convert difficult looks from the perimeter. This high-variance outing perfectly encapsulates his recent surge in minutes, pairing lethal outside shooting with erratic decision-making.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.2%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg +4.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring +17.3
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +1.8
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Bruce Brown 28.2m
14
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
+4.9

Opportunistic scoring (+13.1) and disruptive point-of-attack defense (+2.1) drove a highly effective two-way performance. Despite some minor turnover issues (-2.4), his ability to finish tough looks (+2.3 ShotMaking) provided a vital spark off the bench. This outing showcased his knack for finding seams in the defense and converting efficiently when the primary actions broke down.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 87.5%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +16.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +13.1
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Tyus Jones 20.8m
5
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.9

A surprising burst of rebounding activity (+5.4 Hustle) was the lone bright spot in an otherwise passive offensive showing. Minimal creation value (+0.2) and uncharacteristic turnover damage (-2.4) highlighted his struggles to organize the second unit effectively. He continues to battle a paralyzing slump, failing to generate meaningful scoring gravity (+1.2) to keep defenses honest.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg +14.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +5.4
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Zeke Nnaji 20.1m
6
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.9

A disastrous defensive showing (-6.2) completely anchored his overall impact, exposing his inability to protect the rim or contain his matchups. While he managed a modest scoring bump (+3.1) compared to his recent slump, his lack of resistance on the other end rendered those contributions meaningless. The glaring lack of hustle value (+0.6) further emphasizes his failure to impact the game physically.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -18.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -6.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Nikola Jokić 18.2m
23
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+21.4

Total control of the offensive glass and paint fueled a massive hustle advantage (+9.2) that set the tone for this dominant outing. His scoring gravity (+19.5) and pristine ball security (+0.0 TO) allowed him to dictate the tempo effortlessly. Even with a slight defensive dip (-1.1), his ability to convert tough looks (+3.8 ShotMaking) kept the opposition entirely off balance.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.1%
USG% 31.4%
Net Rtg +15.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Scoring +19.5
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +9.2
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
David Roddy 33.5m
15
pts
13
reb
2
ast
Impact
+17.1

Absolute dominance on the glass (+16.5 Hustle) transformed him into a game-changing physical force. He paired this brute-force rebounding with solid offensive execution, generating clean looks for teammates (+3.4 Creation) without committing a single turnover. This performance perfectly illustrates his value as a bruising, high-energy connector when his motor runs hot.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.4%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +3.4
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +16.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Curtis Jones 31.8m
13
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.8

Lethal perimeter execution drove a massive scoring surge (+11.7) as he punished the defense for leaving him open. A strong shot-making bonus (+3.9) reflects his flawless conversion rate from deep, while unexpected activity on the boards (+6.3 Hustle) amplified his overall impact. Breaking out of a severe slump, his floor-spacing gravity completely altered the geometry of the offense.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 4/4 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 110.5%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg +10.8
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.8m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
-8.6

Severe ball-control issues (-4.7 Turnovers) completely negated his methodical offensive execution. Although he flashed some ability to hit tough shots (+2.6 ShotMaking), his possession-stalling style failed to generate meaningful creation value (+0.9). The giveaways ultimately doomed his stint, turning a decent scoring output (+3.2) into a net negative.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +18.9
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
16
pts
11
reb
4
ast
Impact
+13.8

Relentless interior physicality fueled a massive hustle advantage (+14.0) that overwhelmed the opposing frontcourt. He compounded this rebounding dominance with highly efficient finishing (+10.5 Scoring, +3.5 ShotMaking), punishing smaller defenders in the paint. Though turnover issues (-3.1) slightly marred the outing, his sheer mass and touch around the rim dictated the terms of engagement.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 37.8%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.9m
Scoring +10.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +14.0
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.4

A disastrously brief stint was ruined by costly giveaways (-2.4 Turnovers) and negative scoring value (-1.4) that immediately derailed the offense. He offered absolutely zero creation or shot-making value, completely failing to establish a rhythm during his limited run. While he managed a slight defensive positive (+1.0), his inability to protect the basketball made him unplayable.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.2m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1