CHA

2025-26 Season

MILES BRIDGES

Charlotte Hornets | Forward | 6-7
Miles Bridges
17.2PPG
5.8RPG
3.2APG
31.1MPG
+7.4 Impact

Bridges produces at an elite rate for a 31-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+7.4
Scoring +14.9
Points Scored 17.2 PPG = +17.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -5.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.6
Creation +1.1
Assists & Self-Creation 3.2 AST/g + self-creation = +1.1
Turnovers -3.3
Turnovers 1.4/g (live + dead blend) = -3.3
Defense +0.1
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.8
Hustle & Effort +4.3
Rebounds 5.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.0
Contested Shots 5.4/g = +1.1
Deflections 1.2/g = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.5/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +17.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.7
Net Impact
+7.4
83th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 83th
17.2 PPG
Efficiency 59th
57.6% TS
Playmaking 84th
3.2 APG
Rebounding 80th
5.8 RPG
Defense 83th
+10.0/g
Hustle 74th
+15.2/g
Creation 80th
+3.58/g
Shot Making 89th
+8.87/g
TO Discipline 58th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Miles Bridges opened the 2025-26 season on a high-volume, erratic shooting marathon where sheer persistence dictated his overall value. When his jumper caught fire, he was an absolute wrecking ball, scorching the nets on 11/11 vs LAL for 34 points on 7-of-12 shooting from deep to generate a massive +29.2 impact score. Yet his true utility often surfaced on his ugliest offensive nights. During the 11/08 vs MIA matchup, Bridges shot a miserable 4-for-16 from the floor but still scraped out a positive +0.2 impact. He survived that horrific shooting performance by relentlessly crashing the glass for 12 rebounds and keeping the offense moving with 7 assists. However, that unyielding green light carries heavy risks when he stops doing the dirty work. On 12/02 vs BKN, his shot selection completely doomed him; he forced up 15 attempts to score a measly 8 points, and without those secondary hustle stats to cushion the blow, his impact plummeted to a brutal -13.2. He remains a chaotic offensive engine, capable of shooting his team out of a deficit just as easily as he shoots them into one.

This midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, with Bridges oscillating wildly between dominant forward and inefficient liability. He looked completely unstoppable during a brilliant performance on 01/04 vs CHI, pairing 26 points with 14 rebounds on crisp 11-for-18 shooting to generate a massive +20.0 impact score. He didn't always need a massive scoring total to dictate the terms of a game, either. He generated a stellar +18.2 impact on 12/27 vs ORL despite scoring a modest 16 points, making his mark by crashing the glass for 11 rebounds and keeping the offense flowing with five assists. Conversely, there were nights where his scoring totals masked a detrimental floor game. He dropped 19 points on 12/21 vs DET, but his tunnel vision and 6-for-15 chucking dragged his team down to a poor -3.1 impact. Ultimately, Bridges needs to curb his trigger-happy tendencies on off nights if he wants to be a reliable cornerstone rather than a nightly roll of the dice.

Miles Bridges spent the final third of the season riding a chaotic pendulum between maddening inefficiency and blistering offensive dominance. Early March was ugly. His erratic shot selection dragged down his overall value, punctuated by a dismal 2-for-13 shooting night on 03/10 vs POR that resulted in a -1.9 Impact score. He eventually flipped the script by attacking the rim with intent and finding his outside stroke. On 04/05 vs MIN, Bridges erupted for 25 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists on a near-perfect 10-for-12 from the floor, generating a massive +26.0 Impact score through flawless shot-making and sharp ball movement. Even when his scoring volume dipped shortly after, he still found ways to tilt the floor. He posted a +13.4 Impact score on 04/07 vs BOS despite scoring only 13 points, driving winning basketball by swallowing up 12 rebounds and keeping the offense flowing with four assists. When Bridges trades contested jumpers for aggressive, multi-dimensional basketball, he becomes an absolute terror on the wing.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Bridges has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Bridges consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +8.9, second-half: +6.0. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 15 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Johnson 122.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 18
P. Banchero 121.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 38.5%
PPP 0.22
PTS 27
P. Siakam 103.7 poss
FG% 55.0%
3P% 55.6%
PPP 0.26
PTS 27
G. Antetokounmpo 83.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 45.5%
PPP 0.28
PTS 23
K. Middleton 70.7 poss
FG% 18.2%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.14
PTS 10
S. Barnes 66.3 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 14.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 15
P. Williams 64.8 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.39
PTS 25
B. Ingram 60.3 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.18
PTS 11
J. Hart 56.3 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 11
T. Harris 55.3 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

P. Banchero 135.3 poss
FG% 48.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 37
S. Barnes 104.9 poss
FG% 69.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 20
G. Antetokounmpo 88.9 poss
FG% 47.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 19
P. Siakam 83.7 poss
FG% 68.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 29
D. Barlow 63.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
J. Johnson 61.7 poss
FG% 47.1%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.32
PTS 20
O. Okongwu 60.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
P. Larsson 60.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 7
K. Middleton 56.9 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
J. Grant 56.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.29
PTS 16

SEASON STATS

79
Games
17.2
PPG
5.8
RPG
3.2
APG
0.6
SPG
0.5
BPG
46.1
FG%
33.4
3P%
82.7
FT%
31.1
MPG

GAME LOG

79 games played