CLE

2025-26 Season

JAYLON TYSON

Cleveland Cavaliers | Guard-Forward | 6-6
Jaylon Tyson
11.9PPG
4.8RPG
2.1APG
25.0MPG
+2.6 Impact

Tyson produces at an above average rate for a 25-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.6
Scoring +10.6
Points Scored 11.9 PPG = +11.9
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -4.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.8
Creation +0.7
Assists & Self-Creation 2.1 AST/g + self-creation = +0.7
Turnovers -3.2
Turnovers 1.4/g (live + dead blend) = -3.2
Defense -0.1
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.1
Hustle & Effort +4.7
Rebounds 4.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.7
Contested Shots 3.8/g = +0.8
Deflections 1.4/g = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.4/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +12.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.1
Net Impact
+2.6
71st pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 64th
12.1 PPG
Efficiency 76th
57.5% TS
Playmaking 38th
2.2 APG
Rebounding 88th
4.9 RPG
Defense 61th
+7.8/g
Hustle 96th
+18.1/g
Creation 65th
+3.28/g
Shot Making 88th
+9.40/g
TO Discipline 53th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jaylon Tyson’s first 23 games defined the chaotic but thrilling evolution of a fringe rotation piece morphing into a highly efficient two-way starter. Early on, he looked completely lost, bottoming out on 10/27 vs DET. He put up a brutal -13.9 impact score in that contest, dragging the offense down by missing all five of his field goal attempts and scoring just three points. But the lightbulb eventually flickered on, leading to an absolute masterclass on 12/02 vs IND. Tyson dominated that night with 27 points and 11 rebounds, earning a massive +29.0 impact score through ruthless 10-for-13 shooting and relentless board work. Even when his jump shot vanished, he found ways to tilt the floor in his team's favor. During the 11/11 vs MIA matchup, he shot a miserable 3-for-10 from the field for just nine points, yet still posted a +8.2 impact score by grabbing nine rebounds and creating extra possessions through sheer hustle. He is no longer just a prospect; he is a genuine problem for opposing wings.

Jaylon Tyson’s mid-season stretch was defined by a rocky demotion to the bench that ultimately ignited a fiery offensive breakout. After laying a total goose egg on 12/23 vs CHA where horrific shot selection yielded a dismal -13.8 Impact, the coaching staff relegated him to the second unit. He responded to the wake-up call by crashing the glass with reckless abandon, posting a massive +23.9 Impact on 12/28 vs HOU thanks to 23 points and 15 rebounds. That bench stint unlocked his aggression, culminating in an absolute masterpiece back in the starting lineup on 01/17 vs PHI. Tyson dropped 39 points on a blistering 13-of-17 from the field, generating a staggering +31.2 Impact entirely through ruthless, highly efficient shot creation. Even when his jumper completely abandoned him later in the month, he still found ways to tilt the floor. During an ugly 1-for-9 shooting night from deep on 01/22 vs CHA, Tyson scraped together a +4.4 Impact because his relentless rebounding and secondary playmaking kept the offense moving despite his scoring struggles.

Jaylon Tyson’s mid-season stretch was defined by a maddening inconsistency that forced the coaching staff to constantly shuffle him between the starting five and the bench. His nightly value wildly fluctuated depending on his willingness to do the dirty work. On 02/11 vs WAS, Tyson scored a meager 7 points but still posted a +2.8 Impact score because he fought for 5 rebounds and provided timely defensive rotations. Conversely, his hollow scoring nights actively hurt the roster. During an 18-point outing on 04/12 vs WAS, Tyson registered a -1.0 Impact score. His volume-heavy shot selection—needing 16 attempts to get those 18 points—and lazy transition defense completely negated his offensive output. When he actually dials in his focus, he transforms into a highly effective two-way wing. He flashed exactly that ceiling on 03/19 vs CHI, pairing 18 points with 11 boards to generate a dominant +15.1 Impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Tyson's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Tyson locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +5.0, second-half: +0.3. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

In a rough stretch — 5 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 5 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 64 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Giddey 80.6 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 19
C. Cunningham 70.9 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.28
PTS 20
K. Knueppel 46.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
T. Maxey 44.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
B. Ingram 38.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
Q. Grimes 37.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
C. McCollum 34.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Harris 34.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
M. Porter Jr. 33.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
J. Murray 33.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. Maxey 84.0 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 8
J. Giddey 81.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 13
C. Cunningham 74.6 poss
FG% 27.8%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 17
K. Knueppel 48.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
M. Porter Jr. 45.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.4
PTS 18
J. Murray 40.6 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
A. Edwards 39.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 12
B. Carrington 38.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.26
PTS 10
S. Sharpe 36.6 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
C. McCollum 35.6 poss
FG% 77.8%
3P% 83.3%
PPP 0.62
PTS 22

SEASON STATS

78
Games
11.9
PPG
4.8
RPG
2.1
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
48.4
FG%
43.3
3P%
72.3
FT%
25.0
MPG

GAME LOG

78 games played