GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S Nae'Qwan Tomlin 36.5m
26
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+21.6

Delivering a game-wrecking performance, Tomlin was fueled by a massive +20.4 Scoring value and an absurd +10.2 Hustle rating. He shattered his recent slump by converting highly contested looks (+5.3 ShotMaking) and relentlessly attacking the offensive glass to generate second-chance points. This was a flawless display of high-motor dominance that single-handedly tilted the floor.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.2%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +5.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Scoring +20.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +10.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 68.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-2.6

Porter Jr.'s elite +7.9 Hustle rating was ultimately undone by a damaging -4.7 Turnover penalty. He rebounded exceptionally well for a guard, but his sloppy decision-making in traffic frequently killed offensive possessions. His passive approach to playmaking (+0.5 Creation) further limited his ability to positively influence the game flow, mirroring his midseason offensive stagnation.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 10.1%
Net Rtg +25.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +7.9
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jaylon Tyson 26.0m
18
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.3

A catastrophic -8.2 Turnover penalty completely neutralized Tyson's otherwise brilliant offensive output. He was a force on the glass (+5.7 Hustle) and hit several high-degree-of-difficulty looks (+4.2 ShotMaking), but his sloppy ball security repeatedly fueled opponent transition opportunities. His raw scoring totals masked a highly erratic floor game that actively sabotaged the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 31.9%
Net Rtg -5.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +5.7
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Larry Nance Jr. 20.1m
10
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.0

Nance Jr. provided a steadying veteran presence, driving his +2.0 Impact through mistake-free execution and a solid +4.7 Hustle rating. He capitalized on his limited touches with a +7.9 Scoring value, snapping out of a crippling early-season offensive funk. While his defensive metrics (-1.4) were slightly negative, his ability to execute without turning the ball over (+0.0 TO) anchored the second unit.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -11.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +4.7
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Max Strus 17.9m
10
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.0

Strus struggled to find his rhythm, posting a -5.0 Impact as his perimeter shooting woes capped his offensive ceiling. Despite a respectable +6.2 Scoring value, his inability to generate meaningful playmaking (+1.0 Creation) or defensive disruption (-0.3 Def) left him as a net negative. When his three-point volume doesn't yield a massive ShotMaking bonus, his overall utility plummets, a pattern evident in this rough outing.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.0%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +18.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.9m
Scoring +6.2
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
22
pts
11
reb
8
ast
Impact
+5.0

Proctor’s +5.0 Impact is a wild statistical anomaly, balancing a brilliant +16.5 Scoring value against an absolutely catastrophic -16.6 Turnover penalty. He was a dominant force on the glass (+9.1 Hustle) and hit incredibly tough shots (+5.8 ShotMaking), yet his reckless ball security constantly breathed life into the opponent. This was the definition of a high-wire act, where elite production barely outpaced crippling mistakes.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.8%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg +10.3
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.7m
Scoring +16.5
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +9.1
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -16.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 7
15
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+10.7

A brilliantly balanced performance saw Enaruna pair a +12.7 Scoring value with a suffocating +5.2 Defensive rating. He consistently made the right reads (+1.8 Creation) and battled on the glass (+3.8 Hustle), proving to be a highly effective two-way connector for the second unit. This was a masterclass in efficient, high-impact rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +9.4
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +12.7
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
Riley Minix 25.2m
12
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.6

Providing a solid two-way spark, Minix posted a +8.8 Scoring value and a disruptive +2.6 Defensive rating, but a -3.1 Turnover penalty dragged him slightly into the red. He hit several tough looks (+2.9 ShotMaking) to break out of a recent offensive slump, though his lack of rebounding (+0.3 Hustle) limited his overall footprint. He operated as a capable release valve whose minor mistakes ultimately negated his scoring punch.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg +25.8
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +8.8
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 29.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Olivier Sarr 24.1m
10
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.1

Sarr anchored the interior with a robust +7.6 Hustle rating and a solid +2.8 Defensive metric, securing extra possessions through sheer physical effort. However, a sloppy -5.4 Turnover penalty prevented him from posting a dominant overall Impact score. He successfully imposed his will in the paint even as his ball security issues threatened to derail his momentum.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 68.3%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg +32.1
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +2.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
WAS Washington Wizards
S Bub Carrington 37.7m
20
pts
2
reb
9
ast
Impact
+0.2

The +0.2 Impact tells the story of a dynamic offensive engine constantly undermining his own brilliance. Carrington generated immense value through difficult conversions (+5.7 ShotMaking) and raw volume (+11.8 Scoring), but a crippling -7.1 Turnover penalty erased nearly all of that positive equity. The raw counting stats mask a highly volatile floor game where catastrophic live-ball giveaways frequently derailed the offense.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 51.8%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg -2.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.7m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
S Jamir Watkins 34.3m
24
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.5

Watkins fueled his massive +11.5 Impact through a relentless perimeter barrage that generated a +19.1 Scoring value. His +5.4 ShotMaking bonus highlights a stark departure from his recent shooting slump, as he consistently drained high-degree-of-difficulty looks from deep. This explosive offensive ceiling completely overshadowed minor turnover costs (-2.4), showcasing what happens when his jumper finally catches up to his hustle.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 76.7%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg -11.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring +19.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 65.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Will Riley 34.3m
6
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-17.4

Riley's brutal -17.4 Impact was anchored by a catastrophic combination of defensive bleeding (-3.1) and sloppy decision-making (-4.7 TO penalty). His inability to convert on high-volume attempts dragged his Scoring value down to -0.4, continuing a season-long trend of empty-calorie minutes. When his shot isn't falling, the hidden costs of his erratic floor game completely sabotage his on-court value.

Shooting
FG 2/11 (18.2%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.3%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -6.3
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring -0.4
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
13
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.2

A chaotic tug-of-war between relentless glass-cleaning and sloppy ball security left Champagnie with a neutral +0.2 Impact. His +6.7 Hustle rating and +3.7 ShotMaking bonus kept the offense afloat during key possessions, but a damaging -5.4 Turnover penalty repeatedly squandered the extra possessions he created. He salvaged an otherwise erratic floor game by doing the dirty work in the margins, a pattern that defined his early-season utility.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.4%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg -9.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +6.7
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
S Anthony Gill 29.8m
14
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.1

Elite interior finishing drove Gill's +5.1 Impact, as he punished defensive rotations to the tune of a +13.2 Scoring metric. He supplemented his hyper-efficient touch with a +4.7 Hustle rating, consistently outworking bigger bodies on the glass. His masterclass in blue-collar dirty work and shot-making (+3.0) provided a crucial stabilizing force against the second unit.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +4.7
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
20
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+5.3

A blistering +17.6 Scoring value propelled Cooper to a strong positive impact despite his glaring ball-security issues. He carved up the defense with high-level conversions (+5.0 ShotMaking), though a brutal -7.1 Turnover penalty prevented this from being a truly dominant outing. His ability to consistently puncture the paint masked the hidden costs of his erratic decision-making, a recurring theme during his midseason stretch.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 84.2%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg -18.2
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +17.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 68.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Julian Reese 18.2m
14
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+11.8

Dominating the interior on both ends, Reese paired a robust +11.7 Scoring value with an elite +6.8 Defensive metric. He played a flawless, mistake-free game (+0.0 TO penalty) while consistently generating extra possessions through a +2.8 Hustle rating. This was a masterclass in blue-collar efficiency, anchoring the paint without demanding offensive usage during his stint.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.9%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg +2.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +2.8
Defense +6.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaden Hardy 16.3m
6
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-11.6

Chronic tunnel vision and defensive liabilities (-2.8) doomed Hardy to a steep -11.6 Impact. He offered absolutely zero playmaking equity (Creation: +0.0) and failed to offset his defensive bleeding with his usual microwave scoring punch. When he isn't generating a massive ShotMaking bonus, his one-dimensional approach actively hurts the rotation.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -19.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.3m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.8

Complete offensive invisibility (-2.4 Scoring, +0.0 Creation) dragged the Impact down to a dismal -12.8 for Black. While he provided a solid point-of-attack presence (+2.4 Defense), his absolute refusal to threaten the rim allowed the defense to play five-on-four. You simply cannot survive rotation minutes when your offensive output is a total black hole.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -5.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.4m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0