DET

2025-26 Season

DANISS JENKINS

Detroit Pistons | Guard | 6-4
Daniss Jenkins
9.3 PPG
2.2 RPG
3.6 APG
19.9 MPG
-1.3 Impact

Jenkins produces at an below average rate for a 20-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.3
Scoring +5.1
Points 9.3 PPG × +1.00 = +9.3
Missed 2PT 2.9/g × -0.78 = -2.3
Missed 3PT 1.7/g × -0.87 = -1.5
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +2.6
Assists 3.6/g × +0.50 = +1.8
Off. Rebounds 0.6/g × +1.26 = +0.8
Turnovers -2.9
Turnovers 1.5/g × -1.95 = -2.9
Defense +0.9
Steals 0.9/g × +2.30 = +2.1
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 1.7/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.0
Contested Shots 2.5/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 1.6/g × +0.65 = +1.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +7.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.0
Net Impact
-1.3
51st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 54th
10.1 PPG
Efficiency 30th
51.8% TS
Playmaking 75th
4.0 APG
Rebounding 33th
2.4 RPG
Rim Protection 63th
0.13/min
Hustle 45th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 22th
0.08/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Daniss Jenkins spent his first twenty games riding a dizzying rollercoaster between electric offensive breakouts and catastrophic shooting slumps. He looked like a legitimate scoring weapon during a massive +15.0 impact performance on 11/10 vs WAS, slicing through the perimeter defense with surgical precision to drop 24 points off the bench. Yet, high raw totals often masked deeper flaws in his floor game. Despite posting 18 points and 12 assists as a starter on 11/12 vs CHI, he actually recorded a -2.2 impact score because his tendency to over-dribble routinely forced the offense into late-clock desperation. The wheels completely fell off a few weeks later on 12/01 vs ATL. Jenkins single-handedly torpedoed the offense with an abysmal shot selection profile, chucking up eight misses from deep to earn a team-worst -17.6 impact mark. To survive in this rotation, he must realize that decisive rim attacks work, but forcing bad perimeter jumpers will quickly banish him back to the bench.

Wild inconsistency defined this dizzying twenty-game stretch for Daniss Jenkins, as he oscillated violently between being an offensive black hole and a lethal bench sparkplug. When his jumper fell, he was utterly devastating. He peaked on 01/04 vs CLE with 25 points and a massive +13.5 impact score by punishing defensive closeouts with a decisive trigger. Yet, high scoring totals did not always translate to winning basketball. During his lone start on 01/21 vs NOP, Jenkins poured in 17 points but still posted a -4.8 impact because errant decision-making in the half-court offense completely undercut his overall value. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without hunting his own shot. On 01/15 vs PHX, he scored just 5 points but generated a stellar +8.0 impact by pushing the tempo and making lightning-quick decisions to spark a massive momentum shift. Jenkins remains a volatile wild card whose nightly effectiveness hinges entirely on whether he attacks with discipline or settles for contested jumpers.

A brutal mid-season shooting slump eventually gave way to a chaotic transition into the starting lineup for Daniss Jenkins. Early on, his offensive rhythm completely flatlined, hitting rock bottom on 02/21 vs CHI with a catastrophic -15.8 impact score driven by a 1-for-6 shooting nightmare. He repeatedly hijacked possessions with forced drives and heavily contested jumpers, bleeding value for the second unit. Given the keys to the starting offense later in the month, he finally caught fire on 03/23 vs LAL, dropping 30 points and 8 assists to earn a massive +11.7 impact mark through pristine pick-and-roll orchestration. Yet, higher usage also exposed his erratic decision-making. Despite logging 19 points and 10 assists on 03/25 vs ATL, his impact cratered to a brutal -13.9 because aggressive trapping schemes coaxed him into a disastrous string of live-ball turnovers. Jenkins can clearly slice through drop coverage when his jumper falls, but his tendency to hemorrhage possessions makes him a wildly unpredictable floor general.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Jenkins's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~8 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 42% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Jenkins consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -0.2, second-half: -2.5. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

FG% 44.4%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 10
T. Jones 66.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
D. Daniels 65.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 7
B. Carrington 48.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 14
C. Porter Jr. 42.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
D. DiVincenzo 41.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 10
J. Fears 34.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.41
PTS 14
J. Shead 33.7 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.24
PTS 8
A. Nembhard 33.4 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.36
PTS 12
D. Schröder 31.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Alexander-Walker 104.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 12
T. Jones 64.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
C. Porter Jr. 48.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. McCollum 48.5 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 23
J. Shead 43.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
M. Conley 39.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
J. Fears 39.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 10
S. Cooper 38.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
B. Carrington 34.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
A. Dosunmu 34.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

67
Games
9.3
PPG
2.2
RPG
3.6
APG
0.9
SPG
0.2
BPG
41.6
FG%
38.3
3P%
81.6
FT%
19.9
MPG

GAME LOG

67 games played