WAS

2025-26 Season

CAM WHITMORE

Washington Wizards | Forward | 6-6
Cam Whitmore
9.2PPG
2.8RPG
0.7APG
16.9MPG
-1.3 Impact

Whitmore produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.3
Scoring +7.3
Points Scored 9.2 PPG = +9.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 0.7 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 0.9/g (live + dead blend) = -2.1
Defense +0.6
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.4
Hustle & Effort +2.6
Rebounds 2.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.1
Contested Shots 1.8/g = +0.4
Deflections 1.1/g = +0.7
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.6/g = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +8.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.2
Net Impact
-1.3
46th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 55th
9.7 PPG
Efficiency 13th
49.1% TS
Playmaking 9th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 21th
2.9 RPG
Defense 5th
+2.9/g
Hustle 19th
+7.9/g
Creation 42th
+2.17/g
Shot Making 28th
+4.21/g
TO Discipline 46th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Cam Whitmore's opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by an erratic search for consistency, plagued by wild shot selection and offensive tunnel vision. He initially looked like a premier bench weapon on 10/22 vs MIL. Racking up 14 points on 50 percent shooting alongside five rebounds, his efficient production yielded a stellar +6.9 Impact score. That momentum vanished quickly, however, as his scoring became a detriment to the second unit's flow. Look at 10/26 vs CHA. He reached double figures with 10 points, but it took him 10 field goal attempts to get there, resulting in a disastrous -9.4 Impact score because his inefficient chucking actively derailed the offense. Yet, he occasionally found ways to salvage his minutes through sheer effort, like on 10/31 vs OKC. Despite scoring just seven points on a dismal 3-of-9 shooting night, his willingness to crash the glass for five rebounds kept his team afloat and earned him a +2.8 Impact score.

Cam Whitmore's mid-November stretch was defined by a sudden resurrection from the absolute fringes of the rotation to an explosive offensive sparkplug. He began the period completely buried, logging a miserable -13.1 Impact score on 11/08 vs CLE while going scoreless in five minutes of empty cardio. Something clicked the very next night on 11/09 vs DAL. Whitmore erupted for 19 points off the bench, generating a stellar +8.9 Impact by hunting his shot aggressively and knocking down three triples. By the end of the week, he had evolved from a one-dimensional gunner into a more versatile threat. Look at his performance on 11/20 vs MIN, where he posted a highly efficient +7.8 Impact despite scoring a modest 13 points. That high rating stemmed directly from his willingness to crash the glass for six rebounds and score efficiently rather than settling for contested jumpers. When he actually engages in the dirty work instead of just floating on the perimeter, Whitmore is a terrifying weapon.

Cam Whitmore’s latest stretch off the bench was a maddening rollercoaster of microwave scoring and offensive black holes. When his jumper was falling, he looked like an elite spark plug. He erupted for 20 points and seven rebounds on 7-of-10 shooting on 11/23 vs CHI, earning a massive +12.3 impact score through sheer offensive efficiency. On 11/26 vs ATL, however, Whitmore completely vanished. He failed to record a single point, rebound, or assist in 10 minutes, sleepwalking to a -9.1 impact mark because he simply stopped engaging with the action. His shot selection devolved entirely by 12/05 vs BOS. He forced up terrible looks to finish a miserable 2-of-11 from the field, punishing his own team with a -9.7 impact score. Until he stops shooting his team out of games on cold nights, his minutes will remain a chaotic gamble.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Whitmore's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 59% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Whitmore locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -2.8, second-half: +0.1. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 25 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Flagg 33.6 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
K. Kuzma 25.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
P. Washington 20.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Eason 17.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
N. Marshall 14.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 5
C. Cunningham 14.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
M. Bridges 12.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Green 11.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Prince 11.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 10.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Kuzma 32.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
C. Flagg 24.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
P. Washington 21.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
N. Marshall 16.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
T. Watford 15.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Bridges 14.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
C. Cunningham 14.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 5
T. Eason 13.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3
K. Durant 13.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 4
R. Holland II 11.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

21
Games
9.2
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.7
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
45.6
FG%
28.6
3P%
74.2
FT%
16.9
MPG

GAME LOG

21 games played