WAS

2025-26 Season

CAM WHITMORE

Washington Wizards | Forward | 6-6
Cam Whitmore
9.2 PPG
2.8 RPG
0.7 APG
16.9 MPG
-1.0 Impact

Whitmore produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.0
Scoring +5.1
Points 9.2 PPG × +1.00 = +9.2
Missed 2PT 2.5/g × -0.78 = -2.0
Missed 3PT 1.9/g × -0.87 = -1.7
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +1.2
Assists 0.7/g × +0.50 = +0.3
Off. Rebounds 0.7/g × +1.26 = +0.9
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Defense +0.7
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 2.1/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Contested Shots 1.8/g × +0.20 = +0.4
Deflections 1.1/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.6/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Raw Impact +6.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −7.7
Net Impact
-1.0
36th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 52th
9.7 PPG
Efficiency 13th
49.1% TS
Playmaking 10th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 23th
2.9 RPG
Rim Protection 52th
0.14/min
Hustle 27th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 44th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Cam Whitmore’s first twenty games were defined by a maddening tug-of-war between explosive athleticism and chronic tunnel vision. When he actually attacked with decisive purpose, he looked unstoppable, erupting for 20 points on 7-of-10 shooting during a hyper-efficient burst on 11/22 vs CHI that yielded a massive +8.0 impact score. Far too often, however, his refusal to pass actively harmed the second unit. During a messy stint on 10/26 vs CHA, Whitmore tallied 10 points but cratered the lineup with a brutal -7.1 impact score because erratic fast-break decisions and live-ball turnovers completely wasted transition advantages. He occasionally found ways to stay afloat without scoring, like on 10/30 vs OKC, where he managed a +3.9 impact despite just 7 points thanks to a strong defensive rating (+3.7) that offset his forced drives into heavy traffic. Yet, his stubborn habits constantly resurfaced. This frustrating stretch culminated on 12/02 vs PHI, where a glaring refusal to move the ball out of double-teams resulted in an ugly 2-for-11 shooting night and an abysmal -7.3 impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Whitmore's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 59% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Whitmore locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -1.8, second-half: -0.2. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 25 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Flagg 33.6 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
K. Kuzma 25.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
P. Washington 20.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Eason 17.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
N. Marshall 14.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 5
C. Cunningham 14.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
M. Bridges 12.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Green 11.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Prince 11.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 10.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Kuzma 32.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
C. Flagg 24.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
P. Washington 21.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
N. Marshall 16.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
T. Watford 15.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Bridges 14.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
C. Cunningham 14.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 5
T. Eason 13.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3
K. Durant 13.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 4
R. Holland II 11.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

21
Games
9.2
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.7
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
45.6
FG%
28.6
3P%
74.2
FT%
16.9
MPG

GAME LOG

21 games played