2025-26 Season
SHARIFE COOPER
2025-26 Season
SHARIFE COOPER
Cooper produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.
Cooper produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 20 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Sharife Cooper’s first fourteen games were defined by a sudden, drastic role change from garbage-time spectator to high-volume rotation guard. After logging empty two-minute shifts in the fall, he was abruptly handed the keys to the offense in February. The raw box scores were deceiving. During the 02/05 vs DET matchup, Cooper poured in 18 points and 5 assists over 34 minutes, yet still posted a -1.3 Impact score. His scoring was heavily offset by hidden costs, as poor defensive rotations and empty-calorie shot selection dragged down his overall effectiveness. He briefly flipped the script during the 02/07 vs BKN contest, recording a +0.2 Impact despite a quieter 14-point scoring night. He managed to stay in the green that evening by playing within the flow of the offense and creating non-scoring value through timely hustle plays. That discipline vanished by the 02/20 vs IND game, where another 18-point outburst resulted in a -1.6 Impact due to his glaring defensive liabilities.
This brutal stretch was defined by deep offensive erraticism and a desperate search for a consistent rotation role. Cooper spent most of late February and early March bleeding value off the bench. During a dismal outing on 03/10 vs MIA, he managed just six points in 15 minutes. He generated a ghastly -14.3 impact score in that contest because his empty offensive possessions and defensive lapses actively sank the second unit. Then came the sudden flashes of brilliance. He erupted on 03/02 vs HOU for 21 points on blazing 8-of-10 shooting, posting a massive +13.6 impact by pairing elite shot selection with pure instant-offense firepower. The coaching staff finally rewarded this untapped potential with a lineup change, promoting him to the opening five on 03/19 vs DET. Cooper delivered 13 points and seven rebounds on 6-of-8 shooting, earning a +5.2 impact through highly efficient finishing and a surprising willingness to crash the glass.
Sharife Cooper's late-season stretch as a backup floor general was defined by sheer volatility. He opened this run looking completely lost on 03/21 vs OKC, managing just three points on 1-for-6 shooting to post a disastrous -14.8 impact score. Poor shot selection and an inability to generate meaningful rhythm effectively stalled the second unit whenever he touched the ball. Even when his shot started falling later in the month, his overall value remained highly suspect, as seen on 04/07 vs CHI. Despite pouring in 17 points on an efficient 6-of-10 from the floor in that contest, he still registered a -4.7 impact score because his empty-calorie scoring came with severe defensive lapses that bled points on the other end. He finally found the right balance of aggression and control on 04/12 vs CLE. Carving up the defense for 20 points and six assists on 8-of-11 shooting, Cooper earned a +5.3 impact mark by generating high-quality looks and actually competing in transition.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Cooper has posted negative impact in 76% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 62% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 42 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
41 games played