2025-26 Season
SHARIFE COOPER
2025-26 Season
SHARIFE COOPER
Cooper produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.
About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works
TEAM COMPARISON
of 18 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Empty-calorie scoring and catastrophic defensive bleeding defined a deeply frustrating stretch for Sharife Cooper. After spending the early winter as a bench-warming afterthought, he finally earned real rotational minutes in February but routinely gave back every point he generated. Look no further than his 18-point outing on 02/05 vs DET. Despite the shiny offensive numbers, he posted a disastrous -9.8 impact score because his constant bleeding of points in transition completely erased his scoring value. His point-of-attack liabilities were even more glaring during a 02/24 vs ATL matchup, where he managed just 7 points and dragged the second unit down with a brutal -11.6 impact score. Yet, just when his rotation spot seemed completely doomed, Cooper flipped the script on 03/02 vs HOU. He poured in 21 points on highly efficient 8-for-10 shooting and generated a massive +12.4 impact score, finally driving winning basketball by slicing through the defensive shell with elite burst and impeccable decision-making.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Cooper has posted negative impact in 80% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 52% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -3.8, second-half -2.9. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 42 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
35 games played