WAS

2025-26 Season

JAMIR WATKINS

Washington Wizards | Forward | 6-6
Jamir Watkins
6.8 PPG
3.7 RPG
1.3 APG
19.9 MPG
-0.6 Impact

Watkins produces at an average rate for a 20-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.6
Scoring +3.8
Points 6.8 PPG × +1.00 = +6.8
Missed 2PT 1.0/g × -0.78 = -0.8
Missed 3PT 2.0/g × -0.87 = -1.7
Missed FT 0.5/g × -1.00 = -0.5
Creation +1.8
Assists 1.3/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 0.9/g × +1.26 = +1.1
Turnovers -1.4
Turnovers 0.7/g × -1.95 = -1.4
Defense +1.9
Steals 1.1/g × +2.30 = +2.5
Blocks 0.5/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 2.8/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.3
Contested Shots 3.3/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 2.3/g × +0.65 = +1.5
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.2/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.5
Raw Impact +9.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.0
Net Impact
-0.6
43th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 228 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 39th
7.7 PPG
Efficiency 79th
60.9% TS
Playmaking 41th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 52th
4.2 RPG
Rim Protection 65th
0.16/min
Hustle 95th
0.16/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 73th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jamir Watkins’s early season was defined by a maddening tug-of-war between elite defensive hustle and offensive ineptitude. He frequently found ways to tilt the floor without scoring, peaking during a brilliant +7.5 impact performance on 12/21 vs SAS where he tallied just four points but blew up passing lanes with elite anticipation. His defensive switchability also drove a massive +12.5 impact on 01/24 vs CHA, stifling pick-and-rolls to spark a rare two-way gem. Yet, whenever his offensive responsibilities expanded, his overall value plummeted. Look no further than his grueling 45-minute shift on 02/07 vs BKN. Despite scoring a stretch-high 13 points, he registered a brutal -10.8 impact because his poor perimeter shot selection actively sabotaged the offense. Until he stops forcing contested jumpers and embraces his true identity as an energy specialist, his court time will remain a volatile gamble.

A chaotic tug-of-war between gritty defensive hustle and self-sabotaging shot selection defined this turbulent stretch for Jamir Watkins. When he fell in love with his jumper, the results were disastrous. Look no further than 02/11 vs CLE, where he scored 16 points but posted a dismal -8.7 impact score because he forced a high volume of heavily contested three-pointers. Conversely, Watkins was an absolute menace when he embraced his identity as a low-usage disruptor. During 03/19 vs DET, he scored just 9 points but generated a massive +8.8 impact score by deploying smothering point-of-attack defense that completely derailed the opponent's rhythm. Unfortunately, his worst habits resurfaced during a starting assignment on 03/22 vs NYK. He dragged his team down to a -8.5 impact mark in that game, as his 1-for-7 bricklaying from beyond the arc cratered his offensive gravity and fueled opponent fast breaks. Ultimately, Watkins remains a lethal defensive weapon off the bench, provided he leaves the contested perimeter shooting to his teammates.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Watkins's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 42% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Watkins consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 50 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Porter Jr. 30.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
C. LeVert 27.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
L. James 27.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
J. Allen 27.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5
D. Mitchell 26.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
D. DeRozan 23.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
K. Brown 19.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
J. Harden 17.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
S. Hauser 17.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
L. Dončić 17.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Porter Jr. 44.5 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
D. Mitchell 39.0 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 16
L. James 38.8 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
C. LeVert 35.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
D. DeRozan 29.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 12
J. Allen 26.5 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 8
J. Harden 25.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.58
PTS 15
P. Watson 22.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
C. Cunningham 21.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 9
P. Pritchard 21.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

46
Games
6.8
PPG
3.7
RPG
1.3
APG
1.1
SPG
0.5
BPG
46.0
FG%
29.8
3P%
67.7
FT%
19.9
MPG

GAME LOG

46 games played