2025-26 Season
JAMIR WATKINS
2025-26 Season
JAMIR WATKINS
Watkins produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.
Watkins produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 20 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Jamir Watkins spent the first stretch of the 2025-26 season wandering through the wilderness of end-of-bench obscurity, struggling to translate sporadic minutes into meaningful production. His lone bright spot arrived on 12/13 vs CLE, where he exploded for 15 points and 8 rebounds on blistering 6-of-7 shooting. That sudden outburst earned him a +6.5 Impact score, driven entirely by hyper-efficient shot selection and aggressive work on the glass. However, that flash of competence was an anomaly in a sea of otherwise dreadful performances. When thrust into the starting lineup on 12/30 vs PHX, Watkins managed just 3 points on 1-of-4 shooting. He posted a brutal -11.6 Impact score in that contest because his offensive passivity and clunky shot creation actively stalled the unit. Even when he hit the boards hard, as he did while grabbing 7 rebounds on 01/19 vs LAC, his complete inability to score dragged down his overall value. His -7.4 Impact score in that matchup reveals the steep cost of playing a wing who cannot hit shots or space the floor.
Jamir Watkins spent this mid-season stretch riding a chaotic rollercoaster, oscillating wildly between erratic chucker and essential sparkplug. When given a spot start on 02/11 vs CLE, he poured in a stretch-high 16 points, but his dismal -4.1 Impact score revealed the hidden costs of his selfish offense. He needed a staggering 16 field goal attempts to get those points, dragging down the entire unit with forced, contested jumpers. Yet, when he reined in his worst impulses, he was wildly effective. During the 01/24 vs CHA matchup, Watkins posted a massive +14.5 Impact despite scoring a modest 11 points. That stellar rating stemmed directly from his relentless rebounding, smart ball movement, and suffocating perimeter effort rather than raw scoring volume. He capped off the stretch on 03/14 vs BOS with a highly efficient 15 points on 11 shots, generating a +11.2 Impact. If he can stop hijacking the offense and focus on gritty hustle, he might actually survive in this league.
Jamir Watkins spent the late winter oscillating wildly between invaluable rotational glue guy and outright offensive liability. He occasionally found ways to tilt games without filling the cup. Look directly at his performance on 03/19 vs DET. Despite scoring a modest 9 points, he generated a massive +11.5 Impact by crashing the glass for 6 rebounds and playing suffocating perimeter defense. However, erratic shot selection frequently dragged his overall value into the red. During the 04/07 vs CHI matchup, Watkins reached double figures with 13 points but still posted a frustrating -2.5 Impact. That negative score stemmed entirely from brutal 1-for-7 chucking from beyond the arc, wasting possessions that completely stalled the offense. He finally put the puzzle together as a starter on 04/12 vs CLE, dropping 24 points with a +11.5 Impact by simply taking better, in-rhythm shots.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Inconsistent. Watkins has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.
Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 39% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Watkins locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -5.2, second-half: +0.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 10 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 50 days ago
Based on 50 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
50 games played