GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DET Detroit Pistons
S Cade Cunningham 44.6m
46
pts
12
reb
11
ast
Impact
+18.4

Shouldered an absolutely historic offensive burden, relentlessly attacking the teeth of the defense despite a brutal shooting percentage. His sheer volume of drives compromised the defensive shell, creating endless rotation breakdowns and trips to the foul line. Paired with shockingly elite point-of-attack defense, he willed his team to success through sheer attrition.

Shooting
FG 14/45 (31.1%)
3PT 2/11 (18.2%)
FT 16/18 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 43.5%
USG% 44.0%
Net Rtg +11.8
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 44.6m
Offense +27.7
Hustle +5.8
Defense +12.7
Raw total +46.2
Avg player in 44.6m -27.8
Impact +18.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 5
BLK 2
TO 2
S Jalen Duren 39.8m
19
pts
14
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.2

Dominated the painted area through sheer physicality and relentless effort on the glass. His ability to seal off defenders early in the clock created high-percentage looks and stabilized the offense. A true foundational performance built on setting bone-crushing screens and protecting the rim.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 7/11 (63.6%)
Advanced
TS% 64.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.8m
Offense +13.6
Hustle +7.0
Defense +9.4
Raw total +30.0
Avg player in 39.8m -24.8
Impact +5.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 42.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Javonte Green 38.0m
11
pts
11
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.0

Brought tremendous chaotic energy to the defensive end, blowing up several handoffs and generating extra possessions. Unfortunately, he gave all that value right back by clanking wide-open spot-up looks and forcing wild drives into traffic. The relentless motor is commendable, but the offensive execution was a heavy anchor.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.3%
USG% 13.9%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Offense +7.8
Hustle +5.7
Defense +9.3
Raw total +22.8
Avg player in 38.0m -23.8
Impact -1.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 52.9%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Duncan Robinson 37.8m
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.6

Opposing guards ruthlessly hunted him in pick-and-roll switches, bleeding points and neutralizing his spacing value. While he managed to knock down a few movement jumpers, the sheer volume of missed perimeter looks hurt the offensive flow. You cannot survive being both a defensive target and an inefficient shooter on the same night.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 59.1%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg +1.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.8m
Offense +9.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense +3.1
Raw total +14.1
Avg player in 37.8m -23.7
Impact -9.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 68.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.4

Looked completely overwhelmed by the speed of the game, resulting in a disastrous net rating. A string of poor decisions in the half-court offense short-circuited multiple possessions and led to easy transition buckets the other way. Needs to simplify his approach and stop trying to force plays that aren't there.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg -27.8
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Offense -0.7
Hustle +2.3
Defense +0.8
Raw total +2.4
Avg player in 23.6m -14.8
Impact -12.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
24
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+14.5

Sliced through the perimeter defense with surgical precision, punishing every lazy closeout with decisive action. His two-way clinic was highlighted by aggressive ball pressure that completely disrupted the opponent's offensive timing. An absolute revelation of a performance where every decision seemed to yield a positive result.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.1%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg +10.7
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Offense +20.5
Hustle +5.3
Defense +9.8
Raw total +35.6
Avg player in 34.0m -21.1
Impact +14.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 2
Chaz Lanier 26.5m
8
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.8

Flashed some intriguing shot-making ability, but struggled mightily with defensive processing speed. Late closeouts and missed tags on the weak side allowed the opponent to generate clean looks from the corner. The offensive flashes are there, but the defensive awareness needs a major overhaul.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -3.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Offense +8.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense +3.0
Raw total +12.7
Avg player in 26.5m -16.5
Impact -3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Paul Reed 13.5m
8
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+11.3

Injected pure adrenaline into the frontcourt rotation with a hyper-efficient, high-motor stint. His knack for keeping plays alive with second-effort tips demoralized the opposing interior defense. A textbook example of a backup big maximizing every single second of floor time.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg +25.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Offense +10.9
Hustle +3.5
Defense +5.4
Raw total +19.8
Avg player in 13.5m -8.5
Impact +11.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.2

Rushed his offensive processing during a brief rotational window, forcing a couple of contested looks early in the clock. Failed to establish a physical presence on the defensive glass, allowing second-chance opportunities. Needs to let the game come to him rather than pressing for impact.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg -39.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.1m
Offense +2.1
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.4
Raw total +3.2
Avg player in 7.1m -4.4
Impact -1.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
WAS Washington Wizards
S CJ McCollum 42.8m
42
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.7

An absolute offensive clinic defined by lethal shot-making off the dribble and excellent shot selection. He consistently punished drop coverage in the pick-and-roll, generating high-value looks that kept the offense humming at an elite level. While his defensive resistance was merely passable, the sheer volume of efficient scoring easily outweighed any lapses.

Shooting
FG 14/25 (56.0%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 70.4%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg +7.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.8m
Offense +26.4
Hustle +4.6
Defense +2.5
Raw total +33.5
Avg player in 42.8m -26.8
Impact +6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 36.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Alex Sarr 37.3m
15
pts
15
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.0

Anchored the interior beautifully with elite rim-deterrence that drove a massive defensive rating. However, his insistence on floating to the perimeter resulted in low-quality, bricked threes that functioned as live-ball turnovers and fueled opponent transition. If he cuts out the ill-advised deep shots, his two-way impact will skyrocket.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.9%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg -7.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.3m
Offense +7.0
Hustle +1.8
Defense +9.5
Raw total +18.3
Avg player in 37.3m -23.3
Impact -5.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
S Kyshawn George 29.2m
14
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-7.2

Despite solid overall shooting efficiency inside the arc, his perimeter shot selection dragged down his overall value. A pattern of forced looks from deep stalled offensive momentum during key stretches, acting as empty possessions. Defensive rotations were adequate, but not nearly enough to overcome the offensive dead ends.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg +0.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Offense +7.1
Hustle +2.6
Defense +1.3
Raw total +11.0
Avg player in 29.2m -18.2
Impact -7.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 27
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Khris Middleton 26.5m
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.9

Strong defensive positioning and active hands in the passing lanes couldn't salvage a brutal offensive outing. Clanking every attempt from beyond the arc cratered his spacing value, allowing defenders to sag and clog the paint. His veteran presence showed up in the hustle metrics, but the missed jumpers were too costly to overcome.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -12.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Offense +0.4
Hustle +3.5
Defense +6.7
Raw total +10.6
Avg player in 26.5m -16.5
Impact -5.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
S Tre Johnson 23.2m
10
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.6

Flashed smooth scoring mechanics, but his overall utility plummeted due to a lack of off-ball engagement. Bleeding value on the defensive end through missed rotations and slow closeouts completely erased his efficient shooting. He needs to show more resistance at the point of attack to stay on the floor.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.2%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -1.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Offense +8.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.9
Raw total +9.9
Avg player in 23.2m -14.5
Impact -4.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
-10.6

Sloppy ball security completely derailed an otherwise highly efficient scoring night. A brutal stretch of careless passes in traffic fueled opponent transition opportunities and absolutely tanked his net rating. The hustle was evident, but you cannot survive coughing up the ball at that rate.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.6%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg -11.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Offense +6.7
Hustle +4.6
Defense -0.2
Raw total +11.1
Avg player in 34.8m -21.7
Impact -10.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 52.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Cam Whitmore 29.3m
20
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.6

Bullied his way to the rim with sheer physical force, generating immense pressure on the interior defense. That downhill aggression was nearly offset by a stubborn refusal to stop launching contested perimeter jumpers. Trimming the fat from his shot profile would turn this marginal positive into a dominant showing.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 68.9%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +6.2
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Offense +13.3
Hustle +1.4
Defense +4.2
Raw total +18.9
Avg player in 29.3m -18.3
Impact +0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.2

Executed his role perfectly by capitalizing on every open look generated by the primary creators. His floor-spacing gravity opened up driving lanes, even when he wasn't touching the ball. A low-mistake, highly efficient shift that provided exactly the stabilizing presence the second unit needed.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 133.3%
USG% 5.7%
Net Rtg +18.4
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Offense +11.5
Hustle +1.0
Defense +2.0
Raw total +14.5
Avg player in 22.9m -14.3
Impact +0.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.5

Completely changed the complexion of the game during his brief stint with surprisingly elite rim protection. Altering shots at the basket and securing contested boards fueled a massive defensive rating spike. This was a masterclass in maximizing limited minutes through high-energy interior play.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg +5.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.7m
Offense +4.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense +11.3
Raw total +18.3
Avg player in 15.7m -9.8
Impact +8.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 3
BLK 3
TO 3
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.0

Barely broke a sweat during a forgettable garbage-time cameo. Failed to register any meaningful hustle stats or defensive stops in his brief window. Simply took up space on the floor without altering the geometry of the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -119.4
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Offense -2.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.2
Raw total -2.2
Avg player in 2.9m -1.8
Impact -4.0
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Stepped onto the hardwood for a fleeting final possession. There was no time to make any measurable impact on either end of the floor. A literal placeholder appearance to close out the clock.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.5m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 0.5m -0.3
Impact -0.3
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0