April 04, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
WAS
2P —
3P —
MIA
2P —
3P —
WAS
MIA
WAS
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Miami Heat
Lethal spot-up shooting and decisive cuts to the rim fueled a highly efficient offensive showcase. His ability to consistently punish late rotations from the perimeter was the defining catalyst for his strong +5.5 net rating.
Offensive initiation was solid, but his overall value tanked due to an inability to navigate screens effectively on the other end. Opposing guards relentlessly targeted him in pick-and-roll actions, bleeding points and driving his impact score into the red.
Shifted entirely into a facilitation and rim-protection role, sacrificing his own scoring volume to anchor the defensive scheme (+4.6 Def). His ability to seamlessly blow up dribble hand-offs on the perimeter defined his night and kept his impact slightly positive despite the passive offensive approach.
Despite extending his streak of highly efficient shooting nights, his overall footprint fell into the negative. Costly live-ball turnovers and a tendency to over-help on defense created easy transition lanes for the opposition, erasing his offensive contributions.
Found his stroke offensively to nearly double his recent scoring output, yet struggled to translate that into a positive net rating. He was frequently caught out of position in transition defense, allowing run-out layups that negated his efficient spot-up shooting.
Completely dominated the painted area with a breakout performance that featured elite rim-running and suffocating drop coverage (+7.8 Def). His sheer physical imposition during a pivotal third-quarter stretch overwhelmed the opposing frontcourt and cemented a stellar impact rating.
A masterclass in exploiting mismatches in the mid-post drove a massive offensive surge compared to his normal output. He compounded this scoring clinic with incredibly disruptive passing-lane defense (+5.5 Def), swinging the game's momentum entirely in his team's favor.
A dramatic spike in facilitation yielded offensive flow, but masked a reckless approach to ball security. Careless live-ball turnovers fueled opponent fast breaks, completely tanking his net impact (-6.7) despite noticeable hustle.
Struggled to find any rhythm during his minutes, forcing contested looks that led to long rebounds and opponent transition opportunities. His lack of physical engagement on the defensive glass further compounded a highly detrimental stint on the floor.
Earned his positive rating almost entirely through tenacious on-ball pressure (+4.6 Def) during a gritty second-half rotation. While his offensive game remains limited, his ability to blow up opposing set plays at the point of attack provided a crucial spark.
Logged less than a minute of garbage-time action, making virtually no imprint on the game's outcome. A single quick rotation on the glass was enough to register a nominally positive score in an otherwise invisible outing.
Washington Wizards
Absolute dominance across all phases of the game yielded a massive +19.7 net impact. He punished defensive closeouts with elite shot selection and paired that offensive explosion with suffocating weak-side rim protection during a crucial second-half run.
Despite bringing commendable energy and disruption on the defensive end (+4.0 Def), his overall footprint was heavily negative due to offensive inefficiency. A pattern of forcing contested mid-range pull-ups derailed the team's half-court rhythm and offset his hustle.
Poor shot selection from beyond the arc cratered his overall value, dragging his net rating into the abyss. Settling for contested early-clock jumpers allowed the opponent to easily dictate the transition pace against him.
Elite point-of-attack defense and active hands (+7.2 Def) completely salvaged an otherwise rough offensive outing. His overall impact flatlined due to forced drives and clanking multiple perimeter looks, continuing a recent trend of inconsistent scoring efficiency.
A sharp regression from his recent highly efficient stretch, as a lack of offensive aggression severely limited his utility. Defensive lapses in rotation compounded the issue, making him a net negative whenever he was pulled into pick-and-roll coverage.
An aggressive downhill scoring mentality doubled his usual production, yet his net impact barely broke even. The offensive surge was heavily mitigated by defensive breakdowns at the point of attack, allowing opposing guards to match his output blow-for-blow.
High-volume perimeter execution kept the half-court offense afloat, but his overall impact still slipped into the red. A recurring tendency to get lost on back-door cuts and late closeouts gave back much of the value he created from behind the arc.
Relentless activity on the glass and high-motor hustle plays (+3.4) drove a highly positive overall rating. He consistently generated second-chance opportunities by winning the physical battle in the paint, masking a slightly pedestrian shooting night.
Capitalized on defensive mismatches to double his usual scoring average via highly efficient interior finishes. While his offensive execution was sharp, a lack of weak-side defensive awareness kept his overall net impact relatively modest.
Completely abandoned his usual scoring role but managed to stay above water through sheer rebounding volume. He anchored the interior defense effectively during a gritty second-quarter stretch, proving he can contribute even when his touch is absent.
A brief, ineffective stint saw him completely vanish from the offensive flow, failing to register any meaningful stats. He was repeatedly targeted in isolation during his short run, resulting in a quick hook from the coaching staff.
