ATL

2025-26 Season

DYSON DANIELS

Atlanta Hawks | Guard | 6-7
Dyson Daniels
11.8 PPG
6.7 RPG
5.9 APG
33.1 MPG
+3.0 Impact

Daniels produces at an above average rate for a 33-minute workload. Elite defensive value (+4.6/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+3.0
Scoring +7.3
Points 11.8 PPG × +1.00 = +11.8
Missed 2PT 3.7/g × -0.78 = -2.9
Missed 3PT 1.2/g × -0.87 = -1.0
Missed FT 0.6/g × -1.00 = -0.6
Creation +5.1
Assists 5.9/g × +0.50 = +3.0
Off. Rebounds 1.7/g × +1.26 = +2.1
Turnovers -3.5
Turnovers 1.8/g × -1.95 = -3.5
Defense +4.6
Steals 2.0/g × +2.30 = +4.6
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 5.0/g × +0.30 = +1.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +5.4
Contested Shots 5.5/g × +0.20 = +1.1
Deflections 4.1/g × +0.65 = +2.7
Loose Balls 1.0/g × +0.60 = +0.6
Screen Assists 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.2/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.6
Raw Impact +18.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −15.9
Net Impact
+3.0
92th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 62th
11.8 PPG
Efficiency 41th
53.8% TS
Playmaking 90th
5.9 APG
Rebounding 97th
6.7 RPG
Rim Protection 94th
0.20/min
Hustle 92th
0.15/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 53th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Dyson Daniels spent the first twenty games of the season operating as a chaotic, high-variance defensive terror whose offensive passivity often sabotaged his relentless hustle. Even when his jumper completely abandoned him, his elite point-of-attack disruption kept him afloat. On 11/07 vs TOR, suffocating perimeter ball pressure dragged his impact score to a positive +1.1 despite an ugly 7-point performance on 2-for-10 shooting. When he actually found his offensive rhythm, the results were phenomenal. During a two-way masterclass on 10/31 vs IND, Daniels generated a massive +13.1 impact score by pairing 18 points with a staggering +8.9 hustle rating. Yet, sloppy decision-making frequently ruined his most prolific playmaking nights. Despite dishing out 13 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds on 11/08 vs LAL, a brutal string of live-ball turnovers and defensive gambles dragged his overall impact down to a disappointing -3.0. He remains a brilliant defensive disruptor, but until he curtails the careless giveaways, his nightly value will continue to swing wildly.

A volatile tug-of-war between suffocating defensive disruption and glaring offensive limitations defined this twenty-game stretch for Dyson Daniels. When his execution faltered, the hidden costs were devastating. Despite scoring a respectable 15 points during the 12/05 vs DEN matchup, defensive miscommunications and struggles navigating screens severely damaged his overall impact, dragging him to a -5.1 mark. Conversely, he frequently found ways to dictate games without filling the scoring column. His 01/13 vs LAL outing yielded just 8 points, yet he drove a +4.5 impact by completely short-circuiting the opponent through elite point-of-attack defense. When both ends of the floor synchronized, the results were an absolute nightmare for opposing guards. During the 01/09 vs DEN game, Daniels erupted for a triple-double of 17 points, 11 rebounds, and 10 assists, generating a massive +19.7 impact fueled by relentless on-ball pressure and elite defensive event-creation.

This midseason stretch was defined by a wildly volatile two-way pendulum, with Dyson Daniels swinging between offensive passivity and absolute defensive terrorization. His unique archetype allowed him to completely hijack games without ever looking at the basket. During a 01/29 vs HOU matchup, he shot a horrific 2-for-12 from the floor for just 4 points, but still dragged his impact to a +3.4 by generating a +8.2 hustle score and locking down his assignments. Conversely, his hidden mistakes could easily sabotage decent scoring nights. Look at his 02/05 vs UTA performance, where he managed 11 points but posted a dismal -7.7 impact score because sloppy half-court ball-handling triggered easy transition buckets for the opponent. When his elite connective passing and defensive disruption finally synced up with confident shooting, the results were devastating. He put on an absolute masterclass on 01/28 vs BOS, posting a staggering +18.8 impact score while tallying 15 points, 6 rebounds, and 9 assists through relentless point-of-attack pressure.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Daniels has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~6 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 69% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Daniels consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +0.9, second-half: +5.1. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 7 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Barrett 102.7 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 18
J. Giddey 80.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 4
C. Cunningham 76.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
F. Wagner 64.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5
R. Kalkbrenner 63.1 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 13
J. Harden 62.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Robinson 60.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
J. Brunson 58.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 7
B. Ingram 48.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
A. Sengun 45.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. Cunningham 102.2 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 20
T. Maxey 101.8 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 19
J. Brunson 90.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.3
PTS 27
B. Ingram 88.4 poss
FG% 72.2%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.36
PTS 32
L. Dončić 83.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.22
PTS 18
P. Siakam 80.9 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 19
D. Mitchell 80.1 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 71.4%
PPP 0.31
PTS 25
J. Giddey 76.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 12
R. Rollins 75.8 poss
FG% 56.2%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 20
F. Wagner 71.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 10

SEASON STATS

73
Games
11.8
PPG
6.7
RPG
5.9
APG
2.0
SPG
0.4
BPG
51.9
FG%
18.2
3P%
62.3
FT%
33.1
MPG

GAME LOG

73 games played