ATL

2025-26 Season

DYSON DANIELS

Atlanta Hawks | Guard | 6-7
Dyson Daniels
11.5PPG
6.8RPG
5.8APG
32.7MPG
+7.3 Impact

Daniels produces at an elite rate for a 33-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+7.3
Scoring +9.7
Points Scored 11.5 PPG = +11.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -4.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.2
Creation +1.2
Assists & Self-Creation 5.8 AST/g + self-creation = +1.2
Turnovers -4.1
Turnovers 1.8/g (live + dead blend) = -4.1
Defense +2.9
Steals 2.0/g = +4.6
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.1
Hustle & Effort +6.7
Rebounds 6.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.3
Contested Shots 4.9/g = +1.0
Deflections 3.6/g = +2.4
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.9/g = +0.5
Screen Assists 1.4/g = +0.4
Raw Impact +16.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
+7.3
85th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 61th
11.5 PPG
Efficiency 36th
52.6% TS
Playmaking 89th
5.8 APG
Rebounding 97th
6.8 RPG
Defense 95th
+12.0/g
Hustle 94th
+16.5/g
Creation 78th
+3.86/g
Shot Making 48th
+6.50/g
TO Discipline 53th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Dyson Daniels opened the 2025-26 campaign by transforming from a tentative offensive afterthought into a relentless, multi-tool Swiss Army knife. Even when his jumper completely abandoned him, his sheer willpower on the glass and as a facilitator kept his floor remarkably high. During the 11/08 vs TOR matchup, he managed just 7 points on dismal shooting, yet walked away with a +5.7 Impact because his 8 rebounds and 8 assists constantly generated extra possessions and open looks for teammates. When his scoring touch actually aligned with that high-revving motor, he was an absolute menace. Look no further than the 11/23 vs CHA tilt, where he bullied his way to 22 points, 9 boards, and 6 assists to post a massive +22.1 Impact. However, his aggressive new mindset occasionally backfired into costly inefficiency. On 12/07 vs WAS, Daniels forced ill-advised attempts to shoot a ghastly 4-for-16 from the floor, dragging his overall footprint down to a -0.6 Impact despite finishing with 12 points. He remains a deeply flawed shooter, but his hustle and playmaking make him an essential, chaotic engine.

This mid-season stretch was defined by Daniels morphing into the ultimate connective puzzle piece, a relentless Swiss Army knife who dictated winning basketball without needing a reliable jump shot. Look at his 12/21 vs CHI performance, where he generated a +4.9 Impact despite scoring just eight points. That positive rating stemmed entirely from his relentless hustle plays and elite court vision, allowing his nine rebounds and nine assists to keep the offense humming. He reached his absolute peak on 01/10 vs DEN, logging a massive +24.6 Impact by bullying the glass for 11 rebounds and dishing out 10 assists in a brilliant triple-double effort. However, his utter lack of spacing occasionally crippled his overall effectiveness on the floor. During an ugly 01/22 vs MEM tilt, an abysmal 1-for-9 shooting night completely tanked his value. He posted a -7.3 Impact in that contest because poor shot selection and offensive hesitation ultimately erased his playmaking contributions. When he attacks the rim and defends with energy, he is an invaluable starter, but his glaring offensive limitations still require careful management.

Dyson Daniels spent the final stretch of the season morphing into the ultimate connective tissue, dictating the rhythm of games without needing to dominate the ball. Look at his brilliant outing on 02/24 vs WAS. He scored a mere 6 points on seven shots, yet he generated a massive +14.0 Impact. That value stemmed entirely from his relentless hustle and unselfish playmaking, crashing the glass for 8 rebounds and dishing out 7 assists to create easy looks for teammates. When the offense actually demanded him to score, the results were devastating, peaking on 03/21 vs GSW. He torched them for 28 points, 7 rebounds, and 6 assists on 12-for-17 shooting, posting an astronomical +36.5 Impact because of his hyper-efficient shot selection. He occasionally faded into the background, like on 03/20 vs HOU when a passive 1-for-5 shooting performance yielded just 3 points and a -6.2 Impact, actively stalling the offense with his hesitation. Still, those quiet nights were rare anomalies for a versatile wing who has mastered the art of winning in the margins.

A relentless commitment to suffocating point-of-attack defense and erratic offensive aggression defined this late-season stretch for Dyson Daniels. He reached his absolute ceiling during a Mar 21 vs GSW matchup, pouring in 28 points and generating a massive +24.1 impact score through sheer two-way dominance. He later morphed into a pure floor general on Apr 10 vs CLE, logging 13 points, 10 rebounds, and 12 assists for a +21.0 impact driven by masterful offensive orchestration and perimeter disruption. Even when his shot abandoned him, his defensive instincts kept him highly valuable. During a Mar 27 vs BOS tilt, Daniels managed a mere 6 points but still posted a +5.9 impact by stifling opposing ball-handlers. However, his extreme reluctance to shoot occasionally hurt the team. On Apr 18 vs NYK, severe offensive passivity dragged his impact down to a -1.7, completely neutralizing the value of his 11 assists and 9 rebounds.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Daniels posts positive impact in 77% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 65% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Daniels consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +6.0, second-half: +8.6. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 11 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Barrett 102.7 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 18
J. Giddey 80.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 4
C. Cunningham 76.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
F. Wagner 64.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5
R. Kalkbrenner 63.1 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 13
J. Harden 62.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Robinson 60.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
J. Brunson 58.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 7
B. Ingram 48.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
A. Sengun 45.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. Cunningham 102.2 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 20
T. Maxey 101.8 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 19
J. Brunson 90.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.3
PTS 27
B. Ingram 88.4 poss
FG% 72.2%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.36
PTS 32
L. Dončić 83.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.22
PTS 18
P. Siakam 80.9 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 19
D. Mitchell 80.1 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 71.4%
PPP 0.31
PTS 25
J. Giddey 76.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 12
R. Rollins 75.8 poss
FG% 56.2%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 20
F. Wagner 71.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 10

SEASON STATS

82
Games
11.5
PPG
6.8
RPG
5.8
APG
2.0
SPG
0.4
BPG
51.3
FG%
19.8
3P%
61.7
FT%
32.7
MPG

GAME LOG

82 games played