WAS

2025-26 Season

LEAKY BLACK

Washington Wizards | Forward | 6-6
Leaky Black
8.1 PPG
5.9 RPG
1.9 APG
31.2 MPG
-5.4 Impact

Black produces at an poor rate for a 31-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.4
Scoring +4.8
Points 8.1 PPG × +1.00 = +8.1
Missed 2PT 2.0/g × -0.78 = -1.6
Missed 3PT 1.8/g × -0.87 = -1.6
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +2.8
Assists 1.9/g × +0.50 = +0.9
Off. Rebounds 1.5/g × +1.26 = +1.9
Turnovers -1.4
Turnovers 0.7/g × -1.95 = -1.4
Defense +1.9
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.8/g × +0.90 = +0.7
Def. Rebounds 4.4/g × +0.30 = +1.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.4
Contested Shots 3.4/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.0/g × +0.30 = +0.3
Raw Impact +10.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −15.9
Net Impact
-5.4
0th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Black has posted negative impact in 89% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 29% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Black consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -7.3, second-half: -4.0. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 8 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

B. Mbeng 31.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
P. Banchero 29.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 7
J. Konchar 25.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
G. Santos 20.0 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
C. Williams 19.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
A. Bailey 19.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.31
PTS 6
D. Bane 18.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Kispert 15.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 4
Z. Williamson 15.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. da Silva 15.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Bailey 35.6 poss
FG% 77.8%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 17
C. Williams 29.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
J. Konchar 24.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
P. Banchero 21.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 4
B. Mbeng 21.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Santos 19.9 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 8
N. Penda 17.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Green 17.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Bane 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Z. Williamson 15.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.51
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

9
Games
8.1
PPG
5.9
RPG
1.9
APG
0.8
SPG
0.8
BPG
44.3
FG%
42.9
3P%
87.5
FT%
31.2
MPG