2025-26 Season
MALAKI BRANHAM
2025-26 Season
MALAKI BRANHAM
Branham produces at an poor rate for a 10-minute workload.
Branham produces at an poor rate for a 10-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 20 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Malaki Branham’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 season was defined by a desperate struggle to stay on the floor and stop bleeding value. He spent most nights as an erratic, empty-calorie gunner. Look at his 11/22 vs TOR appearance. He poured in 9 points in merely 5 minutes, yet still posted a -0.4 Impact score because his rapid-fire offense lacked any defensive resistance or playmaking to anchor it. He finally flipped the script during the 12/03 vs PHI matchup. By crashing the glass for 5 rebounds and moving the ball for 2 assists, he generated a stellar +6.8 Impact to go with a highly efficient 8 points. Unfortunately, those well-rounded flashes were rare anomalies. He frequently bottomed out when his jumper failed, sinking to an abysmal -12.2 Impact on 11/26 vs ATL after missing all three of his field goals and offering zero rebounding presence.
Malaki Branham’s mid-winter stretch was defined by a rapid descent into rotation irrelevance. The slide began on 12/07 vs ATL, where he stumbled through 14 empty minutes, missing all three of his shots to post a brutal -19.3 Impact due to hesitant shot selection and a failure to generate any offensive flow. Even when he managed to find the basket, the underlying metrics painted a bleak picture. During the 12/22 vs SAS matchup, Branham scored a stretch-high 9 points on 4-of-8 shooting, but still dragged the team down with a -4.8 Impact. His complete lack of playmaking—failing to record a single assist in 16 minutes—combined with sluggish defensive rotations meant his scoring was entirely hollow. By the time he logged a mere three minutes on 01/07 vs ORL, his role had completely evaporated. He recorded zero points and a staggering -10.1 Impact in that brief cameo, aimlessly floating through possessions without making a single tangible play to justify his floor time.
Malaki Branham’s mid-January stretch was defined by extreme rotational whiplash, oscillating wildly between core playmaker and end-of-bench afterthought. Given a massive 31-minute leash on 01/08 vs PHI, he dished out eight assists but still registered a -1.0 Impact due to abysmal 3-for-10 shooting from the floor. When his jumper vanished, so did his overall value. This bottomed out during a brief eight-minute stint on 01/24 vs CHA, where empty possessions and poor defensive effort resulted in a catastrophic -12.2 Impact. He finally caught fire on 01/30 vs LAL, pouring in 17 points on sharp perimeter shooting. However, that outburst only yielded a modest +2.3 Impact. Because he contributed zero assists and grabbed just a single rebound against Los Angeles, his floor value was entirely dependent on his scoring. Branham operates strictly as a one-dimensional microwave scorer right now, carrying too many hidden costs to be trusted with consistent minutes.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Branham has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Average defender. Branham doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 39 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
28 games played