WAS

2025-26 Season

MALAKI BRANHAM

Washington Wizards | Forward | 6-4
Malaki Branham
4.6PPG
1.6RPG
0.8APG
9.8MPG
-5.0 Impact

Branham produces at an poor rate for a 10-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.0
Scoring +4.4
Points Scored 4.6 PPG = +4.6
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.0
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 0.8 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.4
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.4
Defense +0.2
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -0.8
Hustle & Effort +1.3
Rebounds 1.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.5
Contested Shots 1.6/g = +0.3
Deflections 0.4/g = +0.3
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +4.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.9
Net Impact
-5.0
16th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 23th
5.9 PPG
Efficiency 20th
51.4% TS
Playmaking 30th
1.2 APG
Rebounding 8th
2.2 RPG
Defense 30th
+5.7/g
Hustle 5th
+5.4/g
Creation 19th
+1.54/g
Shot Making 32th
+4.51/g
TO Discipline 35th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Malaki Branham’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 season was defined by a desperate struggle to stay on the floor and stop bleeding value. He spent most nights as an erratic, empty-calorie gunner. Look at his 11/22 vs TOR appearance. He poured in 9 points in merely 5 minutes, yet still posted a -0.4 Impact score because his rapid-fire offense lacked any defensive resistance or playmaking to anchor it. He finally flipped the script during the 12/03 vs PHI matchup. By crashing the glass for 5 rebounds and moving the ball for 2 assists, he generated a stellar +6.8 Impact to go with a highly efficient 8 points. Unfortunately, those well-rounded flashes were rare anomalies. He frequently bottomed out when his jumper failed, sinking to an abysmal -12.2 Impact on 11/26 vs ATL after missing all three of his field goals and offering zero rebounding presence.

Malaki Branham’s mid-winter stretch was defined by a rapid descent into rotation irrelevance. The slide began on 12/07 vs ATL, where he stumbled through 14 empty minutes, missing all three of his shots to post a brutal -19.3 Impact due to hesitant shot selection and a failure to generate any offensive flow. Even when he managed to find the basket, the underlying metrics painted a bleak picture. During the 12/22 vs SAS matchup, Branham scored a stretch-high 9 points on 4-of-8 shooting, but still dragged the team down with a -4.8 Impact. His complete lack of playmaking—failing to record a single assist in 16 minutes—combined with sluggish defensive rotations meant his scoring was entirely hollow. By the time he logged a mere three minutes on 01/07 vs ORL, his role had completely evaporated. He recorded zero points and a staggering -10.1 Impact in that brief cameo, aimlessly floating through possessions without making a single tangible play to justify his floor time.

Malaki Branham’s mid-January stretch was defined by extreme rotational whiplash, oscillating wildly between core playmaker and end-of-bench afterthought. Given a massive 31-minute leash on 01/08 vs PHI, he dished out eight assists but still registered a -1.0 Impact due to abysmal 3-for-10 shooting from the floor. When his jumper vanished, so did his overall value. This bottomed out during a brief eight-minute stint on 01/24 vs CHA, where empty possessions and poor defensive effort resulted in a catastrophic -12.2 Impact. He finally caught fire on 01/30 vs LAL, pouring in 17 points on sharp perimeter shooting. However, that outburst only yielded a modest +2.3 Impact. Because he contributed zero assists and grabbed just a single rebound against Los Angeles, his floor value was entirely dependent on his scoring. Branham operates strictly as a one-dimensional microwave scorer right now, carrying too many hidden costs to be trusted with consistent minutes.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Branham has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Branham doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 39 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. McCain 17.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
J. Goodwin 13.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
L. Kennard 13.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
H. González 12.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
T. Maxey 10.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Simons 10.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 2
J. Edwards 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. George 9.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 4
V. Krejčí 9.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Z. Risacher 8.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

P. George 12.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.39
PTS 5
J. Vanderbilt 12.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. McCain 12.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
L. Kennard 12.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 3
H. González 11.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Hawkins 10.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Q. Grimes 10.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Goodwin 10.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 4
Z. Risacher 9.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. McGowens 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

28
Games
4.6
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.8
APG
0.4
SPG
0.1
BPG
47.3
FG%
37.8
3P%
82.4
FT%
9.8
MPG

GAME LOG

28 games played