BKN

2025-26 Season

NOLAN TRAORE

Brooklyn Nets | Guard | 6-3
Nolan Traore
8.5 PPG
1.7 RPG
3.8 APG
22.3 MPG
-6.2 Impact

Traore produces at an poor rate for a 22-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.2
Scoring +4.0
Points 8.5 PPG × +1.00 = +8.5
Missed 2PT 3.1/g × -0.78 = -2.4
Missed 3PT 2.1/g × -0.87 = -1.8
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.4
Assists 3.8/g × +0.50 = +1.9
Off. Rebounds 0.4/g × +1.26 = +0.5
Turnovers -4.5
Turnovers 2.3/g × -1.95 = -4.5
Defense +0.7
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 1.3/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.7
Contested Shots 3.6/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.3/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Raw Impact +4.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.5
Net Impact
-6.2
1st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 47th
8.8 PPG
Efficiency 9th
45.1% TS
Playmaking 74th
3.9 APG
Rebounding 11th
1.8 RPG
Rim Protection 19th
0.09/min
Hustle 25th
0.08/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 6th
0.10/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Nolan Traore's first twenty games were defined by crippling indecision and erratic shot selection. Even when his jumper caught fire, hidden costs ruined his minutes. During a 16-point outburst on 01/18 vs CHI, a disastrous turnover rate dragged his overall impact down to a -2.7. The structural flaws in his game were even more glaring on 01/04 vs DEN, where he hoisted highly contested perimeter looks early in the clock to earn a brutal -12.5 impact score. He occasionally found ways to contribute without filling the box score, scratching out a +0.2 impact on 10/22 vs CHA by abandoning his offense to relentlessly hound opposing ball-handlers. Hunted in pick-and-roll coverage and prone to stalling the offense, Traore desperately needs to simplify his approach before his minutes vanish completely.

Nolan Traore’s elevation to the starting lineup was defined by a brutal slump of forced offense and cratering overall value. Too often, the young guard chased empty statistics that actively harmed his team. Look no further than 02/05 vs ORL, where a massive 21-point scoring surge was completely negated by a -5.1 impact score due to underlying defensive liabilities. He repeated this hollow production on 02/11 vs IND, dropping 20 points but bleeding value to the tune of a -7.5 impact because of severe issues outside of his individual scoring. Conversely, when he stopped hunting his own shot, his actual worth emerged. During his 02/09 vs CHI outing, Traore scored a modest 13 points but still managed a +0.7 impact by relying on elite table-setting and 13 assists to manipulate pick-and-roll coverages. To survive as a primary initiator, he must realize that jacking up contested shots will only keep his squad in the red.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Traore has posted negative impact in 87% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 34% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Traore locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

In a rough stretch — 10 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 57 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Daniels 62.6 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
D. Mitchell 51.6 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 15
B. Carrington 39.9 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
M. Sasser 37.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
C. Wallace 35.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 7
A. Simons 30.4 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 14
J. McCain 28.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 10
B. Williams 28.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
A. Reaves 27.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
R. Sheppard 26.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Mitchell 48.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
D. Daniels 35.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
B. Carrington 29.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
C. McCollum 29.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 12
A. Wiggins 29.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Sheppard 28.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 7
A. Simons 27.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7
J. Harden 26.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5
D. Robinson 25.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 10
L. Ball 25.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 10

SEASON STATS

52
Games
8.5
PPG
1.7
RPG
3.8
APG
0.8
SPG
0.4
BPG
37.5
FG%
32.1
3P%
78.0
FT%
22.3
MPG

GAME LOG

52 games played