April 01, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
PHI
2P —
3P —
WAS
2P —
3P —
PHI
WAS
PHI
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Washington Wizards
A strong scoring output drove a solid +12.1 box score rating. Yet, his overall impact plummeted to -7.4, indicating that a pattern of defensive liabilities and likely live-ball turnovers completely negated his offensive contributions.
High-volume playmaking and solid hustle (+3.1) generated positive base metrics. Unfortunately, poor shooting efficiency and a massive drop-off in total impact suggest a pattern of costly turnovers heavily penalized his overall rating.
A brutal shooting night defined by heavy missed attempts completely cratered his box score impact. Compounded by negative defensive metrics and likely turnovers, his performance was a massive drain, resulting in a -17.3 total.
Solid defensive metrics (+3.6) highlighted a decent effort on that end of the floor, defined by his active perimeter contests. However, a lack of shooting efficiency and hidden negative plays dragged his overall impact into the negative.
Incredible shooting efficiency in limited minutes fueled a massive +13.3 box score rating, defined by his flawless perimeter execution. He avoided major mistakes, allowing his offensive outburst to translate directly into a highly positive +9.5 total impact.
Near-perfect shooting efficiency resulted in a massive +25.1 box score rating, defined by an unstoppable scoring surge well above his season averages. While hidden costs like turnovers ate into his final number, his sheer offensive dominance and solid defense (+2.5) kept him firmly in the positive.
Severe shooting struggles and poor shot selection tanked his offensive value. Despite decent defensive metrics (+2.6), the sheer volume of missed perimeter shots and likely turnovers drove his total impact down to a dismal -12.4.
Generated decent offensive value and hustle during his time on the floor. However, a steep drop from his box metrics to a -5.7 total implies that a pattern of poor ball security or defensive breakdowns erased his positive plays.
Highly efficient scoring and elite defensive metrics (+5.3) defined a phenomenal two-way performance. He minimized mistakes well enough to ensure his strong rim-protection and shot-making translated into a robust +10.0 overall impact.
Strong hustle (+3.6) and efficient, low-volume shooting kept his base metrics positive, defined by his active off-ball movement. He managed the game well enough to avoid major negative swings, finishing with a slightly positive total impact.
Philadelphia 76ers
Relentless offensive creation and solid hustle (+3.8) kept his base metrics incredibly high. Despite the heavy scoring load, a pattern of defensive lapses and likely ball-security issues dragged his final impact down significantly from his raw production.
High-level playmaking and an aggressive scoring surge created a massive +22.6 box score rating. However, his overall impact was heavily diluted down to +3.0, suggesting a pattern of costly live-ball turnovers gave much of that value right back to the opponent.
An absolute offensive masterclass generated a colossal +35.6 box score impact, defined by a massive scoring surge well above his usual averages. Combined with elite defensive metrics (+8.3), his scoring volume easily overcame any negative plays to post a massive +27.8 overall rating.
Perfect shooting from the field generated positive base metrics, but a massive gap between his box score and a -6.2 Total indicates severe hidden costs. A pattern of live-ball turnovers and poor rotational defense completely erased his flawless offensive execution.
Flawless interior finishing drove a highly efficient offensive showing that far exceeded his typical scoring output. He supplemented this perfect rim-running pattern with strong defensive positioning (+4.8) to lock in a double-digit positive impact.
Dominant rebounding and elite defensive metrics (+6.7) anchored his positive impact on the floor. His ability to secure extra possessions and protect the paint defined his stint, driving a solid +4.2 overall rating despite low offensive volume.
Exceptional effort plays generated a team-high +5.0 hustle rating, defined by his relentless pursuit of loose balls. Unfortunately, those extra possessions couldn't fully offset the hidden costs of turnovers or defensive breakdowns, leaving him with a slightly negative final score.
Decent shooting efficiency wasn't enough to keep his overall impact out of the red. A lack of high-end defensive playmaking and a pattern of hidden negative events like off-ball fouls or turnovers pushed his final score to -4.7.
Struggled to find any rhythm offensively, with a pattern of missed perimeter shots tanking his box score impact. A negative defensive rating further compounded his struggles, leading to a -5.0 total in limited minutes.
Poor shot selection and missed attempts severely limited his offensive value during a brief rotation stint. Coupled with negative defensive metrics, his time on the floor resulted in a steady drain on the team's overall performance.
Converted his only attempt during a short stint on the floor, providing a quick burst of clean offense. Minimal mistakes and a clean sheet kept his overall impact mildly in the green.
Made the most of a very brief appearance by hitting all his shots in a quick offensive burst. This perfect efficiency in a tiny sample size was enough to secure a slightly positive overall impact.
Failed to register any offensive stats, leading to a negative box score rating during his brief rotation minutes. His time on the floor was characterized by empty possessions, resulting in a -3.1 total impact.
