Washington Wizards

Eastern Conference

Washington
Wizards

17-65
L10

ROSTER — IMPACT RANKINGS

Alex Sarr
Center Yr 1 48G (48S)
+8.5
16.3 pts
7.4 reb
2.7 ast
27.2 min

Alex Sarr’s midseason stretch was defined by a volatile shift from a rebounding terror to an erratic volume shooter. He initially looked unstoppable. During a monstrous outing on 01/28 vs POR, he racked up 29 points and 12 rebounds. Despite needing a staggering 29 shot attempts to get his points, his relentless effort on the boards earned him a massive +28.5 Impact score. The very next night on 01/29 vs MIL, Sarr took a backseat offensively with just 16 points. He still generated a stellar +17.1 Impact simply by swallowing up 17 rebounds and completely controlling the glass to create extra possessions. By March, however, the wheels completely fell off his offensive game. During an abysmal showing on 03/19 vs DET, his disastrous shot selection yielded just 2 points on 1-of-12 shooting, dragging him down to a brutal -23.3 Impact score and highlighting the hidden costs of his cold spells.

CJ McCollum
Guard Yr 12 35G (35S)
+7.4
18.8 pts
3.5 reb
3.6 ast
30.9 min

A swift promotion from the second unit to a permanent starting role defined this late-season stretch for CJ McCollum. When his perimeter stroke caught fire, he was an absolute offensive wrecking ball. During the 03/14 vs MIL matchup, he erupted for 30 points on blistering 7-for-10 shooting from beyond the arc, earning a massive +20.6 impact score through sheer shot-making brilliance. Yet, he also found ways to tilt the floor when his scoring volume dipped. In his first start of this run on 02/22 vs BKN, McCollum scored a modest 16 points but still drove a +10.1 impact by aggressively crashing the glass for eight rebounds and making smart passes. That veteran green light is a double-edged sword, however. Despite generating 14 points and six assists on 03/30 vs BOS, his impact plummeted to -5.4 because he needed 17 field goal attempts to get there, stalling the offense with forced, inefficient looks. He remains a lethal scorer, but his erratic shot selection makes him a highly volatile asset.

Julian Reese
Forward Yr 0 13G (10S)
+5.6
11.8 pts
10.5 reb
1.8 ast
30.9 min
Alondes Williams
Guard Yr 3 4G
+5.0
11.0 pts
6.2 reb
3.0 ast
25.2 min
Kadary Richmond
Guard Yr 0 3G
+4.6
8.3 pts
3.3 reb
2.7 ast
22.3 min
Marvin Bagley III
Forward Yr 7 38G (8S)
+1.8
10.1 pts
5.7 reb
1.5 ast
19.2 min

Marvin Bagley III's late-season stretch was defined by maddening volatility, oscillating wildly between hyper-efficient bench scoring binges and completely invisible spot starts. When engaged as a reserve, he was a wrecking ball. During the 03/28 vs POR matchup, he erupted for 26 points and 9 rebounds on blistering 11-for-14 shooting, generating a massive +26.2 Impact score through flawless shot selection and sheer offensive force. He flashed similar value on 02/20 vs MIN, logging a +17.0 Impact score by bullying his way to 13 boards and generating crucial second-chance opportunities in the paint. Yet, thrust into the starting lineup on 02/26 vs SAC, Bagley managed a respectable 10 points and 9 rebounds but still posted a -4.3 Impact score. That negative mark stemmed from the hidden costs of his floor time, as defensive lapses and poor rotational awareness dragged down his overall effectiveness despite the decent counting stats. As an energetic backup, he remains a potent weapon, but heavier starting responsibilities quickly expose his glaring fundamental limitations.

Trae Young
Guard Yr 7 5G (5S)
+1.6
15.2 pts
3.0 reb
6.2 ast
20.7 min
Justin Champagnie
Guard-Forward Yr 4 69G (19S)
+1.5
8.7 pts
5.6 reb
1.2 ast
20.0 min

Justin Champagnie spent this middle stretch of the season oscillating wildly between vital energy guy and offensive liability. When dialed in, he punished mismatches and crashed the glass with reckless abandon. He peaked early on 02/07 vs BKN, pairing 21 points with nine rebounds to generate a massive +15.8 Impact. He did not always need to fill the basket to shift the momentum, however. During the 02/11 vs CLE matchup, he managed just 12 points but posted a stellar +16.4 Impact because his relentless rebounding and aggressive defensive rotations suffocated the opposition. Yet, his erratic shot profile could quickly turn him into a detriment. Look no further than 04/12 vs CLE, where he scored 13 points but finished with a -0.7 Impact because brutal shot selection dragged down his overall value. He clanked his way to a 5-for-14 shooting night while forcing ten three-pointers, actively shooting his team out of rhythm.

Kyshawn George
Forward Yr 1 48G (48S)
+1.1
14.8 pts
5.1 reb
4.5 ast
29.0 min

Kyshawn George’s mid-season stretch was a volatile rollercoaster, defined by early two-way brilliance that rapidly devolved into a brutal shooting slump. He was an absolute menace on 01/23 vs DEN, posting a massive +14.6 impact despite an ugly 6-for-17 shooting night. He salvaged his value in that contest by crashing the glass for 12 rebounds and dishing out 7 assists, generating crucial extra possessions through sheer hustle. The heavy workload eventually broke his rhythm. On 01/30 vs LAL, he managed a respectable 15 points but dragged the lineup down with a -6.7 impact. That negative rating stemmed directly from hidden costs on the floor; his forced perimeter jumpers and lazy defensive rotations routinely killed his team's momentum. By the time the 02/19 vs IND game arrived, his confidence was entirely gone. He logged just 6 points on 3-for-10 shooting, yielding a dismal -8.5 impact because his stagnant off-ball movement completely stalled the offense.

Bilal Coulibaly
Guard Yr 2 56G (56S)
+1.0
11.7 pts
4.3 reb
2.6 ast
26.2 min

Bilal Coulibaly’s late-season stretch was defined by a maddening pendulum swing between aggressive offensive mastery and absolute shooting futility. When his jumper abandoned him, the results were disastrous. During the 03/08 vs NOP matchup, he forced terrible looks all night to finish with just 5 points on an abysmal 1-for-12 from the field, resulting in a brutal -11.5 Impact score. Yet, just four days later on 03/12 vs ORL, he flipped the script entirely by pouring in 29 points on 21 shot attempts. That relentless scoring aggression, paired with 5 assists, drove a stellar +15.5 Impact score as he single-handedly kept the offense afloat. Even when his shot volume dipped, as it did on 03/14 vs BOS, he still found ways to influence winning. Despite scoring only 12 points in that contest, he earned a +4.6 Impact score by locking down defensively and generating crucial hustle plays. He remains a highly volatile weapon.

Cam Whitmore
Forward Yr 2 21G
-1.3
9.2 pts
2.8 reb
0.7 ast
16.9 min

Cam Whitmore’s latest stretch off the bench was a maddening rollercoaster of microwave scoring and offensive black holes. When his jumper was falling, he looked like an elite spark plug. He erupted for 20 points and seven rebounds on 7-of-10 shooting on 11/23 vs CHI, earning a massive +12.3 impact score through sheer offensive efficiency. On 11/26 vs ATL, however, Whitmore completely vanished. He failed to record a single point, rebound, or assist in 10 minutes, sleepwalking to a -9.1 impact mark because he simply stopped engaging with the action. His shot selection devolved entirely by 12/05 vs BOS. He forced up terrible looks to finish a miserable 2-of-11 from the field, punishing his own team with a -9.7 impact score. Until he stops shooting his team out of games on cold nights, his minutes will remain a chaotic gamble.

Tristan Vukcevic
Forward Yr 2 49G (12S)
-1.5
9.0 pts
3.0 reb
1.1 ast
13.7 min

Tristan Vukcevic’s midseason stretch was defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between lethal perimeter shot-making and glaring lapses in effort that temporarily cost him his starting job. When his jumper caught fire, he looked completely unstoppable. He erupted for 22 points on 6-of-7 shooting from deep during the 03/14 vs BOS matchup, generating a massive +15.4 Impact score through pure offensive firepower. However, his scoring totals frequently masked hidden costs on the glass. During the 03/22 vs NYK game, he tallied an efficient 13 points in just 15 minutes, but still posted a -1.9 Impact score because he grabbed a meager single rebound and offered little interior resistance. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to contribute when his offensive touches were limited. He scored just 11 points in the 03/12 vs ORL contest, yet managed a positive +1.2 Impact score by aggressively attacking the glass to secure 11 rebounds. This wild unpredictability makes him a fascinating, albeit frustrating, rotation piece.

Jamir Watkins
Forward Yr 0 50G (7S)
-2.2
7.4 pts
3.9 reb
1.3 ast
20.6 min

Jamir Watkins spent the late winter oscillating wildly between invaluable rotational glue guy and outright offensive liability. He occasionally found ways to tilt games without filling the cup. Look directly at his performance on 03/19 vs DET. Despite scoring a modest 9 points, he generated a massive +11.5 Impact by crashing the glass for 6 rebounds and playing suffocating perimeter defense. However, erratic shot selection frequently dragged his overall value into the red. During the 04/07 vs CHI matchup, Watkins reached double figures with 13 points but still posted a frustrating -2.5 Impact. That negative score stemmed entirely from brutal 1-for-7 chucking from beyond the arc, wasting possessions that completely stalled the offense. He finally put the puzzle together as a starter on 04/12 vs CLE, dropping 24 points with a +11.5 Impact by simply taking better, in-rhythm shots.

Corey Kispert
Forward Yr 4 19G (2S)
-2.4
9.2 pts
2.3 reb
1.7 ast
19.5 min

Corey Kispert's late-season stretch was defined by a spectacular opening fireworks display followed by a grueling, month-long shooting hangover. He erupted out of the gates on 02/26 vs WAS, torching the nets for 33 points on 6-of-11 three-point shooting to post a staggering +25.4 Impact score. But the magic faded instantly. Once his jumper abandoned him, his lack of secondary playmaking severely punished his team. This offensive futility peaked on 03/28 vs SAC, where a brutal 0-for-3 night from beyond the arc and zero assists resulted in a dismal -14.1 Impact score. Even when he managed to scrape together double-digit scoring, hidden costs dragged him down. During his 10-point outing on 03/18 vs DAL, a complete lack of playmaking—evidenced by zero assists—and empty-calorie possessions handed him a -5.4 Impact score.

Anthony Gill
Forward Yr 5 55G (8S)
-2.5
5.8 pts
2.9 reb
1.3 ast
17.3 min

Anthony Gill’s late-season stretch was defined by a dramatic role elevation, morphing from a bench afterthought into a hyper-efficient spot starter. Even when his shot refused to fall, he found ways to alter games, generating a +3.6 Impact on 03/16 vs GSW despite scoring just four points because he aggressively attacked the glass for eight crucial rebounds. Once his offensive touch caught fire, he became a genuine weapon. He absolutely torched the nets on 04/01 vs PHI, pouring in 21 points and dishing six assists on near-perfect 8-for-9 shooting to earn a massive +15.0 Impact. That stellar rating stemmed entirely from his flawless shot selection and secondary playmaking, giving his team an enormous offensive spark without wasting possessions. However, heavier minutes occasionally exposed his limitations against top-tier athletes. During a grueling 35-minute shift on 04/10 vs MIA, he managed an efficient 10 points, but his -3.0 Impact revealed the hidden costs of an otherwise empty floor game where he grabbed just three rebounds and provided virtually no playmaking to keep the offense flowing.

Khris Middleton
Forward Yr 13 34G (34S)
-3.0
10.3 pts
3.9 reb
3.3 ast
24.3 min

This brutal late-season stretch was defined by a jarring demotion to the bench as Khris Middleton's offensive consistency completely evaporated. He opened March looking entirely lost in the starting lineup, posting a miserable -11.4 Impact score on 03/01 vs OKC due to poor shot selection that yielded just four points on an abysmal 2-of-10 from the floor. The coaching staff mercifully pulled him from the first unit shortly after, which briefly unlocked a bizarre, fleeting anomaly. Catching absolute fire on 03/12 vs MEM, Middleton poured in 35 points on 8-of-10 shooting from beyond the arc, generating a massive +34.8 Impact score purely through sheer, unadulterated shot-making efficiency. That explosive outburst was a complete mirage. He quickly reverted to being a heavy negative on the floor, bottoming out on 04/03 vs ORL with a staggering -21.3 Impact score. During that scoreless 12-minute disaster, his forced jumpers and total lack of defensive effort actively bled points for his team. Aside from one random night of vintage marksmanship, this was a grim stretch for a declining veteran struggling to find his footing.

Will Riley
Forward Yr 0 74G (18S)
-3.0
10.3 pts
2.9 reb
2.0 ast
22.1 min

Will Riley’s late-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between explosive offensive outbursts and brutal, offense-killing slumps. When his shot selection tightened up, he looked like a genuine star. He erupted on 04/04 vs MIA for 31 points on pristine 12-of-17 shooting, generating a staggering +34.0 Impact score. Yet, his insistence on forcing bad jumpers often dragged his team down, even when his raw point totals looked respectable. He dropped 20 points on 03/30 vs LAL, but the hidden cost of his inefficient volume resulted in a -0.7 Impact after he bricked six of his seven three-point attempts and tallied just two assists. The bottom completely fell out on 04/07 vs CHI. Relegated back to the bench, he clanked his way to a miserable 1-of-13 shooting night, registering a disastrous -17.8 Impact.

Skal Labissiere
Forward-Center Yr 5 3G
-3.1
4.3 pts
3.0 reb
1.0 ast
12.5 min
Leaky Black
Forward Yr 1 15G (9S)
-3.3
7.1 pts
5.0 reb
1.5 ast
28.9 min
Tre Johnson
Guard Yr 0 60G (42S)
-3.5
12.2 pts
2.8 reb
2.0 ast
24.1 min

Tre Johnson spent this twenty-game stretch trapped in a brutal offensive deep-freeze that routinely sabotaged his team on the floor. His shot selection was completely erratic. Look no further than the 03/12 vs ORL disaster. Johnson managed just 3 points on an abysmal 1/11 from the field, resulting in a catastrophic -24.3 Impact score because his forced, clanking jumpers constantly fueled Orlando's transition game. Even when his attempts actually fell, his hollow floor game dragged down his overall value. During the 03/10 vs MIA matchup, he scored a respectable 17 points on 7/12 shooting, yet still posted a -2.0 Impact due to empty-calorie isolation tendencies and a failure to facilitate for his teammates. He did find a fleeting rhythm on 03/08 vs NOP, stretching the defense with four made threes en route to 20 points and a +8.0 Impact. Unfortunately, that brief spark was quickly swallowed by a sea of inefficient chucking.

Sharife Cooper
Guard Yr 1 41G (1S)
-4.8
8.1 pts
2.1 reb
3.0 ast
17.1 min

Sharife Cooper's late-season stretch as a backup floor general was defined by sheer volatility. He opened this run looking completely lost on 03/21 vs OKC, managing just three points on 1-for-6 shooting to post a disastrous -14.8 impact score. Poor shot selection and an inability to generate meaningful rhythm effectively stalled the second unit whenever he touched the ball. Even when his shot started falling later in the month, his overall value remained highly suspect, as seen on 04/07 vs CHI. Despite pouring in 17 points on an efficient 6-of-10 from the floor in that contest, he still registered a -4.7 impact score because his empty-calorie scoring came with severe defensive lapses that bled points on the other end. He finally found the right balance of aggression and control on 04/12 vs CLE. Carving up the defense for 20 points and six assists on 8-of-11 shooting, Cooper earned a +5.3 impact mark by generating high-quality looks and actually competing in transition.

Malaki Branham
Forward Yr 3 28G
-5.0
4.6 pts
1.6 reb
0.8 ast
9.8 min

Malaki Branham’s mid-January stretch was defined by extreme rotational whiplash, oscillating wildly between core playmaker and end-of-bench afterthought. Given a massive 31-minute leash on 01/08 vs PHI, he dished out eight assists but still registered a -1.0 Impact due to abysmal 3-for-10 shooting from the floor. When his jumper vanished, so did his overall value. This bottomed out during a brief eight-minute stint on 01/24 vs CHA, where empty possessions and poor defensive effort resulted in a catastrophic -12.2 Impact. He finally caught fire on 01/30 vs LAL, pouring in 17 points on sharp perimeter shooting. However, that outburst only yielded a modest +2.3 Impact. Because he contributed zero assists and grabbed just a single rebound against Los Angeles, his floor value was entirely dependent on his scoring. Branham operates strictly as a one-dimensional microwave scorer right now, carrying too many hidden costs to be trusted with consistent minutes.

Jaden Hardy
Guard Yr 3 23G
-5.2
12.6 pts
1.7 reb
1.3 ast
20.4 min

Jaden Hardy’s late-season stretch was defined by empty-calorie scoring and maddening inconsistency as a one-dimensional bench gunner. When his jumper caught fire, he looked like a legitimate spark plug, erupting for 25 points on 03/22 vs NYK to generate a +7.3 Impact score. But that same trigger-happy approach frequently sabotaged his team. Just three days later on 03/25 vs UTA, he poured in 21 points but dragged the lineup down with a dismal -9.3 Impact score. That negative rating stemmed directly from his extreme tunnel vision and selfish shot selection, as he hoisted 18 attempts without recording a single assist. His floor completely collapsed when he wasn't actively hunting baskets. During a bizarre stint on 03/16 vs GSW, Hardy logged 12 cardio-filled minutes without attempting a single field goal or grabbing a rebound, resulting in a catastrophic -18.8 Impact score due to his total lack of off-ball engagement and defensive apathy.

Bub Carrington
Guard Yr 1 82G (48S)
-5.7
10.7 pts
3.4 reb
4.6 ast
27.7 min

Bub Carrington’s late-season promotion to the starting lineup was defined by empty-calorie scoring and catastrophic defensive breakdowns. Look no further than the Mar 21 vs OKC matchup. His 19 points completely masked the defensive breakdowns and spacing issues that tanked his overall impact to a dismal -17.0. Even when he caught fire from deep during a 30-point eruption on Mar 17 vs DET, his defensive apathy (-3.3 defensive impact) kept his total score at a barely positive +0.2. Ironically, his most valuable contribution came off the bench on Mar 12 vs ORL. Despite scoring just 12 points, he generated a +5.8 impact score by relying on relentless energy and securing 50/50 balls rather than forcing bad shots. Too often, however, Carrington bogged down the offense with erratic shot selection and live-ball turnovers. Until he learns to apply pressure at the point of attack, his flashy box scores will continue to ring hollow.

AJ Johnson
Guard Yr 1 25G
-8.0
2.8 pts
1.2 reb
0.9 ast
8.6 min

A catastrophic shooting slump defined AJ Johnson's late-season stretch, relegating him to the deep end of the bench as a severe offensive liability. He opened this bleak run on 02/27 vs MEM by forcing up terrible looks, bricking his way to a 3-for-13 shooting night and a -6.9 Impact score. His minutes quickly evaporated. The shot selection completely bottomed out on 04/08 vs PHX, where an abysmal 1-for-11 shooting performance yielded a -8.7 Impact score. Even when the ball finally went through the hoop on 04/12 vs CHI, the underlying metrics painted an ugly picture. Despite pouring in a stretch-high 20 points, Johnson registered a brutal -10.5 Impact score. Those empty-calorie buckets came with massive hidden costs, as poor defensive rotations and a stubborn 0-for-3 night from beyond the arc actively hurt the team while he was on the floor.

Keshon Gilbert
Guard Yr 0 3G
-11.5
2.0 pts
1.7 reb
1.0 ast
16.1 min
L
@ CLE CLE
117 WAS CLE 130
CLE @ CLE
117 130
Sun, Apr 12
Analysis
-13
L
vs MIA MIA
140 MIA WAS 117
MIA vs MIA
117 140
Fri, Apr 10
Analysis
-23
L
vs CHI CHI
119 CHI WAS 108
CHI vs CHI
108 119
Thu, Apr 9
Analysis
-11
L
vs CHI CHI
129 CHI WAS 98
CHI vs CHI
98 129
Tue, Apr 7
Analysis
-31
L
@ BKN BKN
115 WAS BKN 121
BKN @ BKN
115 121
Sun, Apr 5
Analysis
-6
L
@ MIA MIA
136 WAS MIA 152
MIA @ MIA
136 152
Sat, Apr 4
Analysis
-16
L
vs PHI PHI
153 PHI WAS 131
PHI vs PHI
131 153
Wed, Apr 1
Analysis
-22
L
@ LAL LAL
101 WAS LAL 120
LAL @ LAL
101 120
Mon, Mar 30
Analysis
-19
L
@ POR POR
88 WAS POR 123
POR @ POR
88 123
Sun, Mar 29
Analysis
-35
L
@ GSW GSW
126 WAS GSW 131
GSW @ GSW
126 131
Sat, Mar 28
Analysis
-5
W
@ UTA UTA
133 WAS UTA 110
UTA @ UTA
133 110
Wed, Mar 25
Analysis
+23
L
@ NYK NYK
113 WAS NYK 145
NYK @ NYK
113 145
Sun, Mar 22
Analysis
-32
L
vs OKC OKC
132 OKC WAS 111
OKC vs OKC
111 132
Sat, Mar 21
Analysis
-21
L
vs DET DET
117 DET WAS 95
DET vs DET
95 117
Thu, Mar 19
Analysis
-22
L
vs DET DET
130 DET WAS 117
DET vs DET
117 130
Tue, Mar 17
Analysis
-13
L
vs GSW GSW
125 GSW WAS 117
GSW vs GSW
117 125
Mon, Mar 16
Analysis
-8
L
@ BOS BOS
100 WAS BOS 111
BOS @ BOS
100 111
Sat, Mar 14
Analysis
-11
L
@ ORL ORL
131 WAS ORL 136
ORL @ ORL
131 136
Thu, Mar 12
Analysis
-5
L
@ MIA MIA
129 WAS MIA 150
MIA @ MIA
129 150
Tue, Mar 10
Analysis
-21
L
@ NOP NOP
118 WAS NOP 138
NOP @ NOP
118 138
Sun, Mar 8
Analysis
-20
L
vs UTA UTA
122 UTA WAS 112
UTA vs UTA
112 122
Thu, Mar 5
Analysis
-10
L
@ ORL ORL
109 WAS ORL 126
ORL @ ORL
109 126
Tue, Mar 3
Analysis
-17
L
vs HOU HOU
123 HOU WAS 118
HOU vs HOU
118 123
Mon, Mar 2
Analysis
-5
L
vs TOR TOR
134 TOR WAS 125
TOR vs TOR
125 134
Sat, Feb 28
Analysis
-9
L
@ ATL ATL
96 WAS ATL 126
ATL @ ATL
96 126
Thu, Feb 26
Analysis
-30
L
@ ATL ATL
98 WAS ATL 119
ATL @ ATL
98 119
Tue, Feb 24
Analysis
-21
L
vs CHA CHA
129 CHA WAS 112
CHA vs CHA
112 129
Sun, Feb 22
Analysis
-17
W
vs IND IND
118 IND WAS 131
IND vs IND
131 118
Fri, Feb 20
Analysis
+13
W
vs IND IND
105 IND WAS 112
IND vs IND
112 105
Thu, Feb 19
Analysis
+7
L
@ CLE CLE
113 WAS CLE 138
CLE @ CLE
113 138
Wed, Feb 11
Analysis
-25
L
vs MIA MIA
132 MIA WAS 101
MIA vs MIA
101 132
Sun, Feb 8
Analysis
-31
L
@ BKN BKN
113 WAS BKN 127
BKN @ BKN
113 127
Sat, Feb 7
Analysis
-14
W
@ DET DET
126 WAS DET 117
DET @ DET
126 117
Thu, Feb 5
Analysis
+9
L
vs NYK NYK
132 NYK WAS 101
NYK vs NYK
101 132
Tue, Feb 3
Analysis
-31
W
vs SAC SAC
112 SAC WAS 116
SAC vs SAC
116 112
Sun, Feb 1
Analysis
+4
L
vs LAL LAL
142 LAL WAS 111
LAL vs LAL
111 142
Fri, Jan 30
Analysis
-31
W
vs MIL MIL
99 MIL WAS 109
MIL vs MIL
109 99
Thu, Jan 29
Analysis
+10
W
vs POR POR
111 POR WAS 115
POR vs POR
115 111
Wed, Jan 28
Analysis
+4
L
@ CHA CHA
115 WAS CHA 119
CHA @ CHA
115 119
Sat, Jan 24
Analysis
-4
L
vs DEN DEN
107 DEN WAS 97
DEN vs DEN
97 107
Fri, Jan 23
Analysis
-10
L
vs LAC LAC
110 LAC WAS 106
LAC vs LAC
106 110
Mon, Jan 19
Analysis
-4
L
@ DEN DEN
115 WAS DEN 121
DEN @ DEN
115 121
Sun, Jan 18
Analysis
-6
L
@ SAC SAC
115 WAS SAC 128
SAC @ SAC
115 128
Sat, Jan 17
Analysis
-13
L
@ LAC LAC
105 WAS LAC 119
LAC @ LAC
105 119
Thu, Jan 15
Analysis
-14
L
@ PHX PHX
93 WAS PHX 112
PHX @ PHX
93 112
Mon, Jan 12
Analysis
-19
L
vs NOP NOP
128 NOP WAS 107
NOP vs NOP
107 128
Sat, Jan 10
Analysis
-21
L
@ PHI PHI
110 WAS PHI 131
PHI @ PHI
110 131
Thu, Jan 8
Analysis
-21
W
vs ORL ORL
112 ORL WAS 120
ORL vs ORL
120 112
Wed, Jan 7
Analysis
+8
L
vs MIN MIN
141 MIN WAS 115
MIN vs MIN
115 141
Sun, Jan 4
Analysis
-26
W
vs BKN BKN
99 BKN WAS 119
BKN vs BKN
119 99
Sat, Jan 3
Analysis
+20
W
@ MIL MIL
114 WAS MIL 113
MIL @ MIL
114 113
Thu, Jan 1
Analysis
+1
L
vs PHX PHX
115 PHX WAS 101
PHX vs PHX
101 115
Tue, Dec 30
Analysis
-14
W
vs MEM MEM
112 MEM WAS 116
MEM vs MEM
116 112
Sun, Dec 28
Analysis
+4
W
vs TOR TOR
117 TOR WAS 138
TOR vs TOR
138 117
Sat, Dec 27
Analysis
+21
L
@ CHA CHA
109 WAS CHA 126
CHA @ CHA
109 126
Wed, Dec 24
Analysis
-17
L
vs SAS SAS
124 SAS WAS 113
SAS vs SAS
113 124
Mon, Dec 22
Analysis
-11
W
@ MEM MEM
130 WAS MEM 122
MEM @ MEM
130 122
Sun, Dec 21
Analysis
+8
L
@ SAS SAS
94 WAS SAS 119
SAS @ SAS
94 119
Fri, Dec 19
Analysis
-25
W
@ IND IND
108 WAS IND 89
IND @ IND
108 89
Sun, Dec 14
Analysis
+19
L
vs CLE CLE
130 CLE WAS 126
CLE vs CLE
126 130
Sat, Dec 13
Analysis
-4
L
vs ATL ATL
131 ATL WAS 116
ATL vs ATL
116 131
Sun, Dec 7
Analysis
-15
L
vs BOS BOS
146 BOS WAS 101
BOS vs BOS
101 146
Fri, Dec 5
Analysis
-45
L
@ PHI PHI
102 WAS PHI 121
PHI @ PHI
102 121
Wed, Dec 3
Analysis
-19
W
vs MIL MIL
126 MIL WAS 129
MIL vs MIL
129 126
Tue, Dec 2
Analysis
+3
L
@ IND IND
86 WAS IND 119
IND @ IND
86 119
Sat, Nov 29
Analysis
-33
W
vs ATL ATL
113 ATL WAS 132
ATL vs ATL
132 113
Wed, Nov 26
Analysis
+19
L
@ CHI CHI
120 WAS CHI 121
CHI @ CHI
120 121
Sun, Nov 23
Analysis
-1
L
@ TOR TOR
110 WAS TOR 140
TOR @ TOR
110 140
Sat, Nov 22
Analysis
-30
L
@ MIN MIN
109 WAS MIN 120
MIN @ MIN
109 120
Thu, Nov 20
Analysis
-11
L
vs BKN BKN
129 BKN WAS 106
BKN vs BKN
106 129
Sun, Nov 16
Analysis
-23
L
@ HOU HOU
112 WAS HOU 135
HOU @ HOU
112 135
Thu, Nov 13
Analysis
-23
L
@ DET DET
135 WAS DET 137
DET @ DET
135 137
Tue, Nov 11
Analysis
-2
L
vs DAL DAL
111 DAL WAS 105
DAL vs DAL
105 111
Sun, Nov 9
Analysis
-6
L
vs CLE CLE
148 CLE WAS 115
CLE vs CLE
115 148
Sat, Nov 8
Analysis
-33
L
@ BOS BOS
107 WAS BOS 136
BOS @ BOS
107 136
Thu, Nov 6
Analysis
-29
L
@ NYK NYK
102 WAS NYK 119
NYK @ NYK
102 119
Tue, Nov 4
Analysis
-17
L
vs ORL ORL
125 ORL WAS 94
ORL vs ORL
94 125
Sat, Nov 1
Analysis
-31
L
@ OKC OKC
108 WAS OKC 127
OKC @ OKC
108 127
Fri, Oct 31
Analysis
-19
L
vs PHI PHI
57 PHI WAS 63
PHI vs PHI
63 57
Tue, Oct 28
Analysis
+6
L
vs CHA CHA
139 CHA WAS 113
CHA vs CHA
113 139
Sun, Oct 26
Analysis
-26
W
@ DAL DAL
117 WAS DAL 107
DAL @ DAL
117 107
Fri, Oct 24
Analysis
+10
L
@ MIL MIL
120 WAS MIL 133
MIL @ MIL
120 133
Wed, Oct 22
Analysis
-13