DAL

2025-26 Season

KHRIS MIDDLETON

Dallas Mavericks | Forward | 6-7
Khris Middleton
10.4 PPG
3.8 RPG
2.9 APG
23.3 MPG
-3.8 Impact

Middleton produces at an below average rate for a 23-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.8
Scoring +5.9
Points 10.4 PPG × +1.00 = +10.4
Missed 2PT 3.2/g × -0.78 = -2.5
Missed 3PT 1.9/g × -0.87 = -1.7
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.5
Assists 2.9/g × +0.50 = +1.4
Off. Rebounds 0.9/g × +1.26 = +1.1
Turnovers -3.5
Turnovers 1.8/g × -1.95 = -3.5
Defense +0.8
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 2.8/g × +0.30 = +0.9
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Contested Shots 2.6/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 1.6/g × +0.65 = +1.0
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +7.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.7
Net Impact
-3.8
3th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 60th
10.4 PPG
Efficiency 17th
50.8% TS
Playmaking 80th
2.9 APG
Rebounding 43th
3.8 RPG
Rim Protection 8th
0.08/min
Hustle 36th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 11th
0.08/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A brutal, prolonged slump defined Khris Middleton's early season, marred by lethargic offensive initiation and glaring defensive liabilities. His struggles bottomed out during the 11/21 vs TOR matchup. Forced perimeter jumpers and a total absence of rhythm resulted in a disastrous 2-point outing and a massive -13.1 impact score. Even when his shot started falling, hidden costs frequently dragged his overall value into the red. During the 12/04 vs BOS game, a highly efficient 16-point performance was completely undone by defensive lapses and a lack of hustle, yielding a -4.8 impact. Opponents relentlessly targeted his fading lateral quickness in isolation. Yet, he occasionally salvaged his worth without relying on his jumper, as seen in the 11/25 vs ATL contest. Middleton managed a +3.5 impact despite scoring just 10 points by pivoting to elite playmaking with 12 assists and tremendous hustle.

A crippling mid-winter shooting slump defined this brutal twenty-game stretch for Khris Middleton, rendering the veteran wing an active liability on most nights. He operated as an absolute offensive black hole on 12/31 vs MIL, missing all six of his field goal attempts to crater his value with a miserable -8.4 impact score. Empty calories plagued him even when his jumper briefly returned. On 01/17 vs DEN, he efficiently poured in 16 points, yet his overall impact slipped to a -3.0 because a string of sluggish defensive errors completely wiped out his scoring contributions. He eventually found ways to survive without a hot hand, grinding out a +3.6 impact score on 01/19 vs LAC despite scoring just 11 points on ugly 3-for-10 shooting. In that matchup, veteran playmaking and timely defensive reads salvaged his night and kept his value in the green. Middleton can still pick apart coverages in isolated moments, but relying on his aging legs for consistent two-way production is becoming a dangerous gamble.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Middleton has posted negative impact in 76% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 43% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Middleton locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

In a rough stretch — 9 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 63 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

P. Banchero 57.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
M. Bridges 56.9 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
K. Kuzma 55.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Walker 52.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 9
B. Ingram 51.9 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
J. Randle 50.7 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 12
G. Antetokounmpo 49.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
A. Edwards 48.2 poss
FG% 72.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 18
Z. Risacher 48.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
J. Harden 37.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Randle 76.2 poss
FG% 21.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 9
M. Bridges 70.7 poss
FG% 18.2%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.14
PTS 10
N. Clowney 63.9 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
J. Walker 50.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 11
M. Turner 46.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Jones 44.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
P. Banchero 43.2 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 16
G. Trent Jr. 40.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
P. Achiuwa 38.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 14
P. Washington 37.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

58
Games
10.4
PPG
3.8
RPG
2.9
APG
0.7
SPG
0.2
BPG
42.0
FG%
35.1
3P%
86.7
FT%
23.3
MPG

GAME LOG

58 games played