Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
WAS lead DAL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DAL 2P — 3P —
WAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 182 attempts

DAL DAL Shot-making Δ

Williams 6/16 -5.8
Flagg 6/15 -3.4
Marshall Hard 9/14 +7.4
Christie 4/14 -5.5
Russell Hard 3/10 -4.7
Washington 4/8 +0.3
Gafford Open 4/5 +2.3
Hardy 3/5 +1.7
Cisse Open 2/3 +0.3
Powell Open 1/2 -0.6

WAS WAS Shot-making Δ

McCollum 9/19 +0.8
Sarr 6/16 -5.4
Whitmore 7/13 +2.8
Johnson Hard 4/13 -3.1
George Hard 3/9 -1.8
Carrington Hard 2/7 -0.2
Bagley III Open 4/7 -1.3
Kispert Hard 1/3 -0.1
Branham 1/2 -0.5
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DAL
WAS
42/93 Field Goals 37/89
45.2% Field Goal % 41.6%
6/24 3-Pointers 11/35
25.0% 3-Point % 31.4%
21/30 Free Throws 20/23
70.0% Free Throw % 87.0%
52.3% True Shooting % 53.0%
61 Total Rebounds 54
16 Offensive 12
35 Defensive 32
26 Assists 17
2.00 Assist/TO Ratio 0.94
13 Turnovers 18
15 Steals 7
6 Blocks 7
17 Fouls 21
66 Points in Paint 44
33 Fast Break Pts 13
23 Points off TOs 16
21 Second Chance Pts 22
59 Bench Points 44
14 Largest Lead 8
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Naji Marshall
30 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 31.0 MIN
+35.68
2
Alex Sarr
17 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 30.7 MIN
+17.95
3
CJ McCollum
25 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 33.3 MIN
+17.86
4
P.J. Washington
14 PTS · 9 REB · 5 AST · 36.6 MIN
+15.61
5
Brandon Williams
14 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST · 25.6 MIN
+14.24
6
Cam Whitmore
19 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 29.2 MIN
+14.18
7
Max Christie
12 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 30.5 MIN
+13.05
8
Cooper Flagg
12 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 33.7 MIN
+8.81
9
Marvin Bagley III
10 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 17.3 MIN
+8.79
10
Dwight Powell
2 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 5.6 MIN
+6.83
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 N. Marshall REBOUND (Off:3 Def:5) 111–105
Q4 0:04 MISS T. Johnson pullup 3PT 111–105
Q4 0:11 P. Washington Free Throw 2 of 2 (14 PTS) 111–105
Q4 0:11 P. Washington Free Throw 1 of 2 (13 PTS) 110–105
Q4 0:11 C. McCollum personal FOUL (3 PF) (Washington 2 FT) 109–105
Q4 0:11 P. Washington REBOUND (Off:2 Def:7) 109–105
Q4 0:13 MISS T. Johnson 26' pullup 3PT 109–105
Q4 0:17 N. Marshall Free Throw 2 of 2 (30 PTS) 109–105
Q4 0:17 TEAM offensive REBOUND 108–105
Q4 0:17 MISS N. Marshall Free Throw 1 of 2 108–105
Q4 0:17 K. George personal FOUL (6 PF) (Marshall 2 FT) 108–105
Q4 0:21 N. Marshall REBOUND (Off:3 Def:4) 108–105
Q4 0:23 MISS B. Williams 7' fadeaway Shot 108–105
Q4 0:45 T. Johnson 11' pullup bank Jump Shot (9 PTS) 108–105
Q4 0:53 T. Johnson REBOUND (Off:1 Def:8) 108–103

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

WAS Washington Wizards
S CJ McCollum 33.3m
25
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.5

Methodical shot creation and exploiting drop coverage kept the offense humming during crucial stretches. He balanced his scoring punch with surprisingly stout positional defense, fighting over screens to contest shooters. The veteran savvy to hunt favorable matchups drove a highly productive shift.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 57.8%
USG% 29.3%
Net Rtg -15.5
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Scoring +17.2
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +4.7
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 45.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 3
S Alex Sarr 30.7m
17
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+9.6

Transformed the game entirely through elite rim protection and erasing defensive mistakes from his teammates. While his shot selection was erratic, his sheer physical dominance in the paint manufactured second-chance opportunities. Bouncing back from a recent slump, his defensive intimidation alone swung the momentum.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 45.6%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +0.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +4.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 2
S Kyshawn George 28.8m
10
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.6

Bleeding points at the point of attack and getting routinely beaten off the dribble cratered his overall rating. Forcing contested perimeter jumpers early in the shot clock only compounded his defensive struggles. A highly damaging two-way shift defined by poor decision-making and slow lateral movement.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -1.6
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Tre Johnson 26.2m
9
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.4

A brutal combination of forced isolation looks and bricked perimeter shots tanked his offensive value. Despite showing decent resistance on the defensive end, his inability to finish through contact resulted in empty possessions. The offense ground to a halt whenever he tried to create off the bounce.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 34.6%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg +1.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +10.5
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
0
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

A stark departure from his recent scoring tear, rendering himself completely passive on the offensive end. Failing to register a single shot attempt allowed defenders to freely double-team the primary ball-handlers. The lack of offensive gravity severely bogged down the second unit's spacing.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +47.7
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +5.4
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Cam Whitmore 29.2m
19
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.9

Explosive scoring bursts were heavily offset by tunnel vision and a failure to rotate defensively. He hunted his own offense effectively but surrendered easy back-door cuts that gave the points right back. The raw production masked a lack of connective tissue in his overall floor game.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.4%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg -14.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-14.1

Disastrous offensive orchestration highlighted by stagnant ball movement and late-clock desperation heaves. He struggled mightily to navigate perimeter pressure, routinely putting the offense in disadvantageous situations. A complete lack of defensive playmaking offered no redemption for his offensive woes.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.1%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg -25.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
4
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.2

Extreme offensive passivity neutralized his value as a floor spacer. By refusing to let it fly when given daylight, he allowed the defense to pack the paint against the drivers. Solid defensive rotations weren't enough to overcome his failure to stretch the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 6.6%
Net Rtg -3.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
10
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.8

Capitalized on deep post position to generate high-percentage looks around the basket. He sealed his man effectively in early transition, though his defensive impact was largely pedestrian. A solid, mistake-free shift that provided reliable interior scoring without giving up too much ground.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg -22.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
2
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.1

Struggled to stay in front of quicker guards, bleeding penetration during his brief stint. While he moved the ball adequately on offense, being targeted in pick-and-roll actions kept his overall impact slightly negative. Failed to leave a lasting positive imprint on either end.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.7m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +4.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.6

Logged only a fleeting moment of garbage time. Insufficient run to generate any meaningful statistical footprint or impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +300.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.5m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +3.4
Defense -2.1
Turnovers -2.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DAL Dallas Mavericks
S P.J. Washington 36.6m
14
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+12.4

High-level defensive versatility and timely weak-side rotations kept his impact firmly in the green. He played excellent positional basketball, punishing defensive lapses with decisive cuts rather than forcing his own offense. A highly efficient complementary shift that stabilized the frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 13.7%
Net Rtg +15.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Scoring +11.0
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +11.4
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Cooper Flagg 33.7m
12
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+3.7

Offensive inefficiency completely tanked his overall value despite elite rim-protection metrics. Settling for heavily contested midrange looks disrupted the team's halfcourt rhythm and led to empty possessions. The stark drop-off from his usual scoring dominance forced others into uncomfortable playmaking roles.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +7.9
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Max Christie 30.5m
12
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.9

Elite perimeter defense and constant disruption at the point of attack salvaged a brutal shooting night. Clanking open spot-up looks severely capped his offensive ceiling, but his relentless screen navigation kept his overall impact above water. He found ways to contribute through sheer effort when the jumper abandoned him.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.2%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +18.0
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.5m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +2.1
Defense +5.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Daniel Gafford 18.6m
8
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.3

Vertical spacing and disciplined rim-running generated highly efficient interior offense. He anchored the paint effectively during his minutes, using his length to alter shots without committing cheap fouls. Maintained his streak of hyper-efficient finishing by strictly taking what the defense surrendered.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -7.9
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.6m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
6
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.7

Horrendous shot selection from beyond the arc created long rebounds that ignited opponent transition opportunities. A complete lack of defensive resistance compounded the damage of his empty offensive trips. The offense stalled out repeatedly when he tried to shoot himself out of the slump.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 27.6%
USG% 26.2%
Net Rtg -45.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring -0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
30
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+40.4

Absolute offensive domination fueled by decisive downhill drives and punishing mismatches in isolation. He read the defense perfectly, exploiting drop coverage with a lethal scoring barrage that broke the game open. His two-way engagement was flawless, pairing a scoring explosion with suffocating on-ball defense.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 79.6%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg +7.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +26.1
Creation +3.1
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +9.2
Defense +6.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
14
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+4.5

A masterclass in generating extra possessions through relentless ball pressure and diving for loose balls. Even with a subpar shooting clip, his ability to blow up dribble hand-offs and force live-ball turnovers tilted the math heavily in his team's favor. The sheer volume of hustle plays completely overshadowed his missed jumpers.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.5%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg +41.5
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +6.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
Moussa Cisse 19.0m
5
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.6

Brought immediate physical presence to the interior with aggressive box-outs and rim deterrence. He embraced a low-usage enforcer role, setting bruising screens that freed up the guards. His defensive discipline against pick-and-roll actions was the hidden engine of his positive rating.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.5%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg +11.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.0m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +10.5
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 2
Jaden Hardy 13.8m
8
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.5

Defensive lapses and poor rotational awareness dragged down a highly efficient scoring stint. He bled points on the perimeter by getting caught ball-watching on back-door cuts. The inability to string together stops negated the value of his quick-trigger shot-making.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +16.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-14.9

Completely invisible during his brief stint, failing to initiate any meaningful offensive sets. A lack of aggression allowed the opposing defense to entirely ignore him off the ball, destroying the team's spacing. He was a net negative simply by being a non-threat.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -38.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.1m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.8

Maximized a tiny rotation window by executing flawless pick-and-roll coverages and sealing off the paint. His veteran positioning forced multiple ball-handlers to abort their drives and reset the offense. Delivered a highly concentrated burst of defensive stability.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +2.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.6m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0