BOS

2025-26 Season

SAM HAUSER

Boston Celtics | Forward | 6-7
Sam Hauser
9.1PPG
3.9RPG
1.4APG
24.6MPG
+0.2 Impact

Hauser produces at an average rate for a 25-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.2
Scoring +8.2
Points Scored 9.1 PPG = +9.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.7
Creation +0.2
Assists & Self-Creation 1.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.2
Turnovers -1.1
Turnovers 0.4/g (live + dead blend) = -1.1
Defense -0.1
Steals 0.5/g = +1.1
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.5
Hustle & Effort +2.7
Rebounds 3.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.0
Contested Shots 3.3/g = +0.7
Deflections 1.1/g = +0.7
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.6/g = +0.2
Raw Impact +9.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.7
Net Impact
+0.2
54th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 51th
9.2 PPG
Efficiency 46th
55.9% TS
Playmaking 41th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 46th
3.9 RPG
Defense 24th
+5.2/g
Hustle 32th
+10.2/g
Creation 2th
+0.83/g
Shot Making 94th
+9.73/g
TO Discipline 99th
0.02/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Sam Hauser’s early season was defined by an ice-cold shooting slump that severely tested the limits of his spot-up role. When the perimeter jumper abandons him, his overall value completely plummets. He bottomed out on 12/12 vs MIL, missing all nine of his three-point attempts. That brick-fest generated a disastrous -18.5 Impact score because a few rebounds couldn't possibly offset the sheer volume of wasted offensive possessions. He still has nights where the basket looks like an ocean, such as his blistering 21-point barrage on 10/29 vs CLE, where burying seven threes yielded a massive +13.7 Impact score. Yet, his most fascinating performance came when the shot wasn't his main weapon. On 11/19 vs BKN, Hauser managed just eight points but posted a robust +9.5 Impact score by crashing the glass for seven rebounds and keeping the offense flowing with three assists. If he wants to survive the cold spells, he must bring that exact kind of blue-collar effort every single night.

Sam Hauser’s mid-season stretch was defined by a permanent promotion to the starting lineup, fueled by moments of absolutely nuclear perimeter shooting. Before making the leap to the first unit, he torched the nets on 12/27 vs IND, pouring in 23 points on a blistering 7-of-8 from beyond the arc to generate a massive +20.6 Impact score in just 17 minutes. He reached an even higher peak as a starter on 01/18 vs ATL, launching a staggering 21 three-point attempts and hitting 10 of them for 30 points and a +21.7 Impact score. But Hauser wasn't just a one-dimensional gunner. During the 01/13 vs IND matchup, his shot abandoned him as he managed just 8 points on 2-of-7 shooting, yet he still clawed out a +3.5 Impact score by crashing the glass for 8 rebounds and giving relentless defensive effort. When the jumper completely vanished, however, his overall value plummeted. Look no further than 02/06 vs MIA, where a brutal 0-for-6 night from deep yielded an abysmal -9.3 Impact score, revealing the glaring offensive costs when his primary weapon misfires.

Sam Hauser’s late-season run was defined by violent swings between absolute perimeter invisibility and blistering net-shredding dominance. During a brutal mid-March freeze, he became an active liability, perfectly captured on 03/20 vs MEM when he posted a dismal -10.4 Impact score while laying a goose egg with zero points on three attempts. When his jumper vanishes, his value plummets because defenders simply ignore him to clog the paint. Conversely, he warped opposing defenses on 04/01 vs MIA by racking up 23 points on wildly efficient 9-for-11 shooting. That performance generated a massive +14.5 Impact score, driven entirely by flawless shot selection and lethal floor spacing. Yet, he doesn't always need a hot hand to tilt the floor. During the 03/10 vs SAS contest, Hauser managed just 11 points but still recorded an excellent +9.1 Impact because he crashed the glass for seven rebounds and kept the offensive flow alive with smart passing.

A brutal, prolonged shooting slump and bouts of extreme offensive passivity defined this late-season stretch for Sam Hauser. His floor-spacing utility completely vanished during the Mar 16 vs PHX matchup, where a severe lack of involvement and bricked perimeter looks cratered his impact to a staggering -14.8. He compounded these struggles by abandoning his usual role and forcing contested shots early in the clock during a dismal Mar 25 vs OKC outing that yielded a -11.1 impact score. Eventually, his quick-trigger confidence returned. He exploded for 24 points on 8-of-12 shooting from deep on Apr 10 vs NOP, yet his overall impact was a surprisingly modest +1.8. Despite warping the opposition with his lethal gravity, poor execution on the other end of the floor—resulting in a -4.2 defensive impact—severely dragged down his overall value. When Hauser simply moves off the ball and takes what the defense gives him, he is a lethal weapon, but forcing the issue turns him into a massive liability.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Hauser's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 35% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Hauser locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 10 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 72 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. McCollum 79.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 18
J. Furphy 61.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 17
M. Porter Jr. 58.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
T. Maxey 49.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
C. Kispert 43.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
D. Robinson 42.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
S. Fontecchio 40.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Green 39.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
T. da Silva 36.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
D. Mitchell 35.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Johnson 68.1 poss
FG% 29.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 13
M. Porter Jr. 53.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 23
K. Oubre Jr. 51.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
C. Flagg 43.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 12
S. Fontecchio 37.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Green 34.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Barrett 32.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.31
PTS 10
O. Okongwu 32.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9
J. Furphy 31.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
J. Harden 29.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

86
Games
9.1
PPG
3.9
RPG
1.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
41.9
FG%
39.4
3P%
85.0
FT%
24.6
MPG

GAME LOG

86 games played