DET

2025-26 Season

TOBIAS HARRIS

Detroit Pistons | Forward | 6-8
Tobias Harris
13.1 PPG
5.2 RPG
2.6 APG
28.0 MPG
-0.4 Impact

Harris produces at an average rate for a 28-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.4
Scoring +8.2
Points 13.1 PPG × +1.00 = +13.1
Missed 2PT 3.3/g × -0.78 = -2.6
Missed 3PT 2.3/g × -0.87 = -2.0
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.9
Assists 2.6/g × +0.50 = +1.3
Off. Rebounds 1.3/g × +1.26 = +1.6
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 1.0/g × -1.95 = -1.9
Defense +1.5
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 3.9/g × +0.30 = +1.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Contested Shots 3.9/g × +0.20 = +0.8
Deflections 1.4/g × +0.65 = +0.9
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +12.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −13.3
Net Impact
-0.4
45th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 69th
13.1 PPG
Efficiency 55th
57.1% TS
Playmaking 74th
2.6 APG
Rebounding 65th
5.2 RPG
Rim Protection 56th
0.15/min
Hustle 11th
0.07/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 78th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tobias Harris spent the first twenty games of the season riding a maddening seesaw of offensive execution, alternating between surgical mismatch hunting and disastrous shot selection. His worst habits surfaced on 11/01 vs DAL. During that brutal outing, a steady diet of contested jumpers resulted in an abysmal -16.2 impact score. Yet, when he actively eliminated those forced looks, his value skyrocketed. Look no further than the 11/22 vs MIL contest, where Harris posted a massive +7.3 impact score by leaning into hyper-efficient shot selection to score 18 points on just nine field goal attempts. Scoring totals rarely dictated his actual worth. He even managed to stay in the green on 10/22 vs CHI with a +1.4 impact despite scoring only 10 points on clunky 4-of-12 shooting. His relentless defensive effort (+24.6 def) salvaged that performance, anchoring the lineup when his jumper completely abandoned him.

A maddening pendulum swing of offensive engagement and shot selection defined this mid-season stretch for Tobias Harris. When he actively hunted mismatches, the veteran forward was highly effective, as seen on 01/27 vs DEN when he attacked the interior for 22 points and a stellar +14.1 impact score. Yet, just a week later on 02/03 vs DEN, he completely abandoned that aggressive blueprint. Despite reaching double figures with 11 points in that rematch, a brutal combination of bricked mid-range jumpers and staggering defensive apathy tanked his value to a horrific -16.4 impact. He frequently settled for heavily contested perimeter looks during this span, neutralizing his own offensive rhythm. Fortunately, Harris eventually found ways to contribute when his jumper failed him late in the stretch. During a clunky 11-point shooting night on 02/27 vs CLE, he still posted a +8.0 impact score by transforming into a defensive menace and piling up hustle plays to salvage his on-court value.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Harris's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Harris consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 59 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Johnson 113.1 poss
FG% 40.7%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.24
PTS 27
B. Ingram 80.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 7
J. Brown 76.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.16
PTS 12
D. White 62.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 17
K. Durant 49.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
D. DeRozan 48.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 14
P. Banchero 41.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
J. Champagnie 41.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Avdija 40.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
J. Hart 39.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.25
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Brown 132.8 poss
FG% 29.7%
3P% 12.5%
PPP 0.23
PTS 31
B. Ingram 73.0 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 19
E. Mobley 70.2 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 24
J. Johnson 60.9 poss
FG% 41.2%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 20
P. Banchero 60.7 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
M. Bridges 55.3 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
N. Clowney 46.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
S. Bey 45.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12
D. Brooks 42.5 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 12
M. Turner 42.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7

SEASON STATS

59
Games
13.1
PPG
5.2
RPG
2.6
APG
0.8
SPG
0.4
BPG
46.2
FG%
34.9
3P%
87.0
FT%
28.0
MPG

GAME LOG

59 games played