Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
ORL lead HOU lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
HOU 2P — 3P —
ORL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 170 attempts

HOU HOU Shot-making Δ

Durant Hard 14/28 +3.8
Sengun 8/15 +0.2
Sheppard Hard 7/11 +8.0
Smith Jr. 6/7 +6.0
Okogie 2/7 -2.0
Thompson 3/5 +1.2
Eason Hard 1/5 -3.2
Finney-Smith Hard 1/3 -0.4
Capela Open 1/1 +0.6

ORL ORL Shot-making Δ

Bane Hard 12/19 +10.5
Banchero Open 6/16 -6.5
Black Hard 3/12 -4.4
Carter Hard 5/10 +4.5
Carter Jr. Open 6/8 +3.6
da Silva Hard 2/8 -2.5
Suggs 1/6 -3.7
Wagner Open 3/4 +0.7
Howard 2/3 +0.7
Isaac Hard 0/2 -1.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
HOU
ORL
43/82 Field Goals 40/88
52.4% Field Goal % 45.5%
11/29 3-Pointers 15/37
37.9% 3-Point % 40.5%
16/20 Free Throws 13/21
80.0% Free Throw % 61.9%
62.2% True Shooting % 55.5%
47 Total Rebounds 52
10 Offensive 15
31 Defensive 25
24 Assists 25
1.85 Assist/TO Ratio 2.08
13 Turnovers 11
7 Steals 11
9 Blocks 4
17 Fouls 16
50 Points in Paint 44
13 Fast Break Pts 11
20 Points off TOs 20
7 Second Chance Pts 30
33 Bench Points 27
7 Largest Lead 19
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Kevin Durant
40 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 39.6 MIN
+34.08
2
Desmond Bane
30 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 37.7 MIN
+30.28
3
Reed Sheppard
20 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 30.7 MIN
+24.0
4
Paolo Banchero
19 PTS · 8 REB · 9 AST · 37.5 MIN
+18.29
5
Wendell Carter Jr.
16 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 27.1 MIN
+12.42
6
Moritz Wagner
6 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 15.1 MIN
+12.05
7
Jevon Carter
14 PTS · 2 REB · 3 AST · 22.2 MIN
+11.99
8
Jabari Smith Jr.
13 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 29.1 MIN
+10.02
9
Clint Capela
4 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 16.6 MIN
+9.16
10
Alperen Sengun
16 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 30.9 MIN
+6.7
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 113–108
Q4 0:00 MISS D. Bane 30' pullup 3PT 113–108
Q4 0:04 K. Durant Free Throw 2 of 2 (40 PTS) 113–108
Q4 0:04 K. Durant Free Throw 1 of 2 (39 PTS) 112–108
Q4 0:04 P. Banchero take personal FOUL (1 PF) (Durant 2 FT) 111–108
Q4 0:05 A. Black 26' 3PT pullup (8 PTS) (P. Banchero 9 AST) 111–108
Q4 0:10 K. Durant Free Throw 2 of 2 (38 PTS) 111–105
Q4 0:10 K. Durant Free Throw 1 of 2 (37 PTS) 110–105
Q4 0:10 W. Carter Jr. personal FOUL (3 PF) (Durant 2 FT) 109–105
Q4 0:11 W. Carter Jr. 26' 3PT (16 PTS) (P. Banchero 8 AST) 109–105
Q4 0:15 TEAM offensive REBOUND 109–102
Q4 0:18 MISS D. Bane 25' pullup 3PT 109–102
Q4 0:22 R. Sheppard 27' 3PT (20 PTS) (A. Sengun 5 AST) 109–102
Q4 0:42 A. Black bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (2 TO) 106–102
Q4 0:51 P. Banchero REBOUND (Off:1 Def:7) 106–102

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ORL Orlando Magic
S Desmond Bane 37.7m
30
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+28.3

An absolute flamethrower from the perimeter whose elite shot-making broke the opposing defense. His ability to hit contested looks off the dribble fueled a dominant +12.7 overall impact.

Shooting
FG 12/19 (63.2%)
3PT 6/10 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.9%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg +7.4
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.7m
Scoring +24.8
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +8.5
Hustle +4.7
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Paolo Banchero 37.5m
19
pts
8
reb
9
ast
Impact
+16.1

Heavy isolation usage resulted in clunky shooting, but elite playmaking salvaged his night. Drawing double teams and spraying passes to shooters kept the offense afloat despite his individual inefficiency.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 7/10 (70.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.6%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg -9.6
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +10.5
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +10.2
Defense +2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 57.9%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
8
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.3

A brutal shooting slump from the perimeter completely tanked his value. Without his usual offensive rhythm, his lack of secondary playmaking was glaringly exposed.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.6m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
16
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.8

Bully-ball interior finishing and high-motor hustle plays anchored a highly effective shift. He consistently sealed his man in the paint, generating easy looks that drove his positive rating.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.2%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -7.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +7.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Anthony Black 23.1m
8
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.4

Disastrous shot selection and a barrage of missed jumpers severely handicapped the offense. The sheer volume of empty possessions completely overshadowed his passable perimeter defense.

Shooting
FG 3/12 (25.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.2%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -18.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Jevon Carter 22.2m
14
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.0

Aggressive perimeter defense and timely spot-up shooting sparked a massive surge in value. He capitalized on open looks generated by the primary ball-handlers while hounding opposing guards.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg +1.2
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.9

A pure defensive masterclass where scoring was entirely optional. Elite rim deterrence and disruptive hustle plays (+3.1) completely overshadowed a scoreless night to drive a positive impact.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -25.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.7m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.5

Highly efficient interior touches and excellent spatial awareness maximized his value in short minutes. He consistently found the soft spots in the defense to generate easy points.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.1m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +4.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Jett Howard 13.7m
4
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.0

Mistake-free execution and solid defensive positioning yielded a modest positive impact. He stayed strictly within his role, taking only high-value shots and avoiding costly turnovers.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -34.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jalen Suggs 13.3m
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-16.9

Offensive rhythm completely evaporated, leading to forced attempts and stalled possessions. Elite point-of-attack defense (+5.6) was the only thing preventing his score from completely bottoming out.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 21.8%
USG% 32.4%
Net Rtg -36.7
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.3m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +4.3
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
HOU Houston Rockets
S Kevin Durant 39.6m
40
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+38.2

A massive volume-driven offensive load offset a surprisingly cold night from beyond the arc. Elite defensive engagement (+6.7) on the wing prevented his missed triples from sinking his overall value.

Shooting
FG 14/28 (50.0%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 10/10 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.7%
USG% 38.6%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.6m
Scoring +29.5
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +8.2
Hustle +9.2
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Tari Eason 32.7m
2
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.1

An absolute offensive crater (-82% scoring drop) destroyed his baseline value. However, relentless hustle (+4.3) and disruptive on-ball defense kept him playable during ugly stretches.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg +24.2
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.7m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
S Alperen Sengun 30.9m
16
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.0

Efficient interior scoring was completely undone by hidden costs like live-ball turnovers and foul trouble. Despite solid hustle metrics, those empty possessions fueled opponent transition opportunities and dragged his total impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.4%
USG% 29.2%
Net Rtg +10.3
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
13
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.1

Near-perfect shooting efficiency was overshadowed by glaring defensive liabilities. Opponents consistently targeted him in pick-and-roll coverages, bleeding away the value he created on the offensive end.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 92.9%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg -3.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +12.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Amen Thompson 28.2m
9
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.4

Passivity and costly turnovers derailed what could have been an efficient outing. His reluctance to attack the basket in the half-court stalled the offense, resulting in a steep negative impact despite solid defensive metrics.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -26.3
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +4.4
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
20
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+16.7

Lethal perimeter shot-making and pristine shot selection fueled a massive positive score. He paired that offensive explosion with surprisingly stout point-of-attack defense (+8.4) to dominate his minutes.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 5/7 (71.4%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 84.2%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +18.5
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Scoring +16.2
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense +5.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 61.1%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
Josh Okogie 20.6m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.1

Clunky offensive possessions and forced shots negated his trademark energy. While he provided decent hustle, the sheer volume of empty offensive trips dragged his rating down.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg +46.8
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Clint Capela 16.6m
4
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.1

Elite rim deterrence defined this brief stint on the floor. He didn't need offensive touches to swing the game, relying entirely on a dominant +8.1 defensive rating to anchor the second unit.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 106.4%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg +6.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.6m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +3.7
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 4
TO 1
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.0

Invisible on the offensive end and a step slow on defensive rotations. The lack of two-way engagement caused a steady bleed of value whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -56.5
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0