December 31, 2025
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
ORL
2P —
3P —
IND
2P —
3P —
ORL
IND
ORL
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Indiana Pacers
Ability to live at the foul line artificially inflated his scoring totals, but his overall impact (-4.2) suffered due to defensive lapses and likely a high turnover rate. The raw point production masked a fundamentally disjointed performance where he gave back points in transition.
Shouldered a massive offensive burden, using his versatile scoring package to generate a strong box impact. However, the sheer volume of missed jumpers slightly suppressed his overall net rating despite a highly engaged defensive effort (+4.7) against opposing wings.
Masterfully orchestrated the offense, combining surgical midrange execution with elite hustle (+6.2) to dominate his matchup. His ability to consistently break down the defense without turning the ball over drove a stellar overall rating.
Entirely ineffective as a floor-spacer, bricking all his perimeter looks and failing to bend the defense. While he offered mild rim protection (+2.8), his offensive dead weight severely penalized his overall impact.
Failed to leave any tangible mark during his brief cameo, offering nothing in terms of scoring or playmaking. A slight negative defensive impact further dragged down a completely empty offensive shift.
Salvaged a brutal shooting night by turning into an absolute terror on the defensive end (+7.7). His relentless energy and elite hustle (+8.1) disrupted opponent sets and generated crucial extra possessions, proving his value goes far beyond shot-making.
Flashed some intriguing offensive versatility, but his inability to consistently defend in space or secure the glass dragged his net rating into the red. The points he generated via pick-and-pop action were largely given right back on the other end of the floor.
Thrived as a low-maintenance floor spacer, punishing defensive rotations with timely perimeter shooting. However, his near-total lack of defensive or hustle contributions meant his overall impact barely crept above neutral despite the hot hand.
Provided a highly efficient two-way spark, picking his spots carefully on offense while utilizing his length to disrupt passing lanes (+4.2 defense). His disciplined shot selection ensured he was a steadying positive force for the second unit.
Usually reliable playmaking was offset by an inability to pressure the rim, allowing defenders to sag off and clog passing lanes. Even a pesky defensive effort (+3.1) couldn't rescue a stint defined by stagnant offensive flow and missed bunnies in the paint.
Struggled to establish any interior presence, missing his few looks in the paint and failing to anchor the rebounding battle. A decent hustle score (+2.5) kept his impact from totally cratering, but his inability to finish through contact made him a net negative.
Orlando Magic
Anchored the frontcourt with a commanding defensive presence (+8.8) that paired perfectly with his highly efficient interior scoring. His ability to bully mismatches in the paint drove a stellar box impact, proving he can dominate without relying on the three-point shot.
A heavy diet of contested pull-up jumpers suppressed his efficiency and dragged down his overall net rating. While he generated offensive volume, defensive breakdowns on the perimeter erased much of the value he created.
Defensive tenacity (+7.2) and a constant motor (+5.5 hustle) set the tone on the perimeter. He capitalized on smart cuts and transition opportunities rather than forcing bad shots, resulting in a highly efficient two-way performance.
Operated primarily as a dirty-work big, generating strong hustle (+4.0) and defensive (+3.7) metrics through physical screen-setting and rim deterrence. However, his nearly invisible offensive footprint and poor finishing around the basket dragged his net impact into the red.
Compensated for a frigid shooting night by transforming into an absolute menace on the margins, logging an elite +8.8 hustle score. His relentless ball pressure and willingness to dive for loose balls completely overshadowed his offensive struggles.
Struggled to find any rhythm, bleeding value through poor shot selection and an inability to generate his usual playmaking gravity. A lack of defensive resistance at the point of attack compounded his offensive woes, resulting in a steep negative overall impact.
An absolute wrecking ball in his limited minutes, converting almost every look around the rim to post a monstrous +18.0 box score impact. His decisive rolls to the basket and flawless finishing created a massive positive swing for the second unit.
A disastrous stint defined by a total inability to find the bottom of the net, which cratered his offensive value. He failed to offset the missed shots with any meaningful defensive or hustle contributions, making him a severe liability during his minutes.
Maximized every second of his floor time with hyper-efficient scoring and decisive off-ball movement. His ability to instantly inject offense via baseline cuts without needing heavy usage fueled a massive box impact in a very short window.
Provided a brief, steadying presence by simply executing his role without forcing the issue. A couple of timely finishes in the paint kept his box impact positive, though his overall footprint remained small.
Ghosted offensively during his stint, failing to record a single shot attempt or generate any gravity. His inability to impact the game on either end of the floor left the team effectively playing 4-on-5, driving a sharp negative net score.
