Orlando Magic

Eastern Conference

Orlando
Magic

45-37
L1

ROSTER — IMPACT RANKINGS

Franz Wagner
Forward Yr 4 34G (32S)
+11.2
20.6 pts
5.2 reb
3.3 ast
30.0 min

This twenty-game stretch was defined by a fascinating tug-of-war between Franz Wagner's relentless downhill aggression and his bouts of erratic shot selection. Heavy offensive volume occasionally masked the hidden costs of his game, perfectly illustrated on 11/14 vs BKN. Despite dropping 25 points, his impact score slipped to -1.4 because ten missed shots and forced interior drives actively harmed the offense. Yet, Wagner possesses a rare ability to salvage value when his jumper abandons him. During the 11/09 vs BOS matchup, he endured a dreadful 5-for-17 shooting night but still managed a +7.3 impact by relentlessly attacking the glass and generating extra possessions. When his decision-making finally aligns with his physical tools, he becomes utterly unguardable. He delivered an absolute masterclass on 11/22 vs NYK, pairing 37 points with a towering +17.4 impact score driven by hyper-efficient 13-of-19 shooting. He remains a highly volatile engine, capable of either breaking a defense apart or stalling out his own team's momentum.

Paolo Banchero
Forward Yr 3 72G (72S)
+10.9
22.2 pts
8.4 reb
5.2 ast
34.7 min

A maddening tug-of-war between unstoppable bully-ball and stagnant perimeter isolation defined this volatile stretch of Paolo Banchero's campaign. You can see the exact cost of his worst habits in the 02/21 vs PHX matchup. Despite pouring in 26 points and grabbing 14 rebounds, his high-volume inefficiency—missing 17 shots from the floor—dragged his net rating into the red for a -1.4 impact. Conversely, when he actually leveraged his physical advantages inside, the results were devastating. During a 03/03 vs WAS clinic, Banchero abandoned the contested jumpers to score 37 points, generating a monstrous +18.2 impact driven entirely by elite shot selection and interior force. He even found ways to salvage his nightly value when his jumper completely broke down. Look at the 03/21 vs LAL contest; he shot a miserable 4-for-14 for just 16 points, yet posted a +6.0 impact because his phenomenal defensive engagement completely bailed out his brutal offensive decisions.

Desmond Bane
Guard Yr 5 82G (82S)
+10.9
20.1 pts
4.1 reb
4.1 ast
33.6 min

Desmond Bane's late-season stretch was defined by a maddening inconsistency, swinging wildly between masterful two-way dominance and catastrophic shot selection. During the Mar 08 vs MIL matchup, he generated a massive +15.1 impact score despite scoring a modest 18 points. He achieved this elite rating by providing immense non-scoring value, utilizing relentless ball pressure and brilliant navigation of off-ball screens to suffocate the opposition. He paired that defensive intensity with an offensive explosion on Mar 11 vs CLE, punishing drop coverages with pristine shot selection to rack up 35 points and a +15.3 impact rating. However, that discipline quickly vanished. On Mar 14 vs MIA, Bane tallied 21 points but posted a dismal -8.7 impact score. A barrage of forced, missed looks from deep and general perimeter struggles inflicted hidden costs that heavily weighed down the offense. When Bane picked his spots, he looked like an elite wing, but his tendency to settle for clunky jumpers too often sabotaged his own production.

Wendell Carter Jr.
Center-Forward Yr 7 78G (78S)
+5.0
11.8 pts
7.4 reb
2.0 ast
29.3 min

Wendell Carter Jr.'s midseason stretch was defined by a maddening tug-of-war between passive offensive invisibility and sudden bursts of physical dominance. He routinely posted empty numbers when his aggression waned, perfectly illustrated on 02/22 vs LAC. Despite grabbing 14 rebounds and scoring 15 points, a surprising dip in interior finishing cratered his actual value, dragging him down to a bleak -7.3 impact score. Conversely, Carter could completely control a game without ever looking at the basket. During a quiet seven-point outing on 02/05 vs BKN, he anchored the paint with elite rim deterrence and textbook screen-setting to post a stellar +6.7 impact. When he actually combined those physical tools with offensive decisiveness, he was virtually unstoppable. He ruthlessly punished smaller defenders with dominant interior positioning on 01/30 vs TOR, pouring in 23 points to drive a massive +13.6 impact score. His ceiling remains tantalizingly high, but only when he stops settling for being a passive spectator in his own offense.

Anthony Black
Guard Yr 2 64G (40S)
+3.5
15.0 pts
3.8 reb
3.7 ast
29.8 min

Anthony Black’s midseason stretch was defined by a maddening Jekyll-and-Hyde routine, oscillating violently between suffocating two-way brilliance and total offensive ineptitude. The ugliness peaked early on 01/22 vs CHA. He posted a catastrophic -18.3 impact score that night. That massive negative rating stemmed directly from atrocious shot selection, as he forced heavily contested looks to finish an abysmal 1-for-11 from the floor. Yet, he completely flipped the script on 01/28 vs MIA by racking up 26 points and generating a stellar +17.2 impact. Relentless point-of-attack defensive pressure and highly efficient finishing drove that dominant rating. Unfortunately, those flashes were repeatedly undone by apathetic outings like 02/22 vs LAC. Despite a respectable 11 points, he logged a brutal -16.9 impact because his invisible defensive effort and empty offensive possessions actively dragged the entire lineup down.

Jalen Suggs
Guard Yr 4 57G (56S)
+2.6
13.8 pts
3.9 reb
5.5 ast
27.6 min

A maddening pendulum swing of erratic shot selection and defensive brilliance defined this chaotic stretch for Jalen Suggs. Even when his scoring totals looked respectable, hidden costs often dragged his overall value into the gutter. During the 01/28 vs MIA matchup, he tallied 16 points but posted a dismal -7.8 impact score because his reckless 1-for-7 chucking from beyond the arc completely stalled out the offensive rhythm. Yet, when he dialed back the hero ball, his underlying value skyrocketed despite quiet scoring nights. He managed a mere 7 points on 02/09 vs MIL, but generated a stellar +10.6 impact by dismantling Milwaukee's offensive sets with suffocating ball pressure and dishing out 10 assists. When his decision-making finally caught up to his physical tools, the results were terrifying. He orchestrated an absolute masterclass on 02/05 vs BKN, logging 15 points, 11 rebounds, and 11 assists for a towering +18.9 impact fueled by flawless execution and relentless two-way hustle.

Tristan da Silva
Forward Yr 1 77G (34S)
+0.8
9.9 pts
3.7 reb
1.6 ast
24.7 min

This mid-season stretch was a turbulent transition into the starting lineup, defined by wild swings between offensive brilliance and complete passivity. Early on, da Silva was an absolute liability off the bench. He posted a devastating -11.3 impact score on 02/03 vs OKC, disappearing entirely while clanking open spot-up looks. Thrust into the starting five later in the month, his erratic jumper continued to haunt him, resulting in a brutal -11.9 impact mark on 02/26 vs HOU. When his shot failed to fall, his tendency to become passive completely tanked his overall value despite occasional defensive hustle. Yet, when he finally found his rhythm, his two-way ceiling was undeniable. He poured in 26 points and 7 rebounds in 41 minutes on 03/12 vs WAS, generating a stellar +12.7 impact score because his suffocating perimeter defense completely disrupted the opponent's flow. He also delivered a flawless 7-for-7 shooting night off the bench on 03/05 vs DAL, riding elite spatial awareness to a massive +17.0 impact score.

Goga Bitadze
Center-Forward Yr 6 64G (3S)
-0.6
5.9 pts
5.0 reb
1.3 ast
15.2 min

Extreme micro-efficiency defined this stretch for Goga Bitadze, as he routinely squeezed maximum value out of microscopic rotation windows. Look no further than his absurd four-minute cameo on Mar 07 vs MIN, where he tallied just four points and four rebounds but posted a staggering +7.7 impact score. That massive rating stemmed entirely from dominating the paint on both ends with relentless per-minute production. He stretched his legs a bit more on Mar 21 vs LAL, racking up nine points, seven boards, and five assists in 18 minutes to earn a +7.1 impact mark. Decisive, hard rolls to the basket shattered the defense and allowed him to capitalize on every single offensive touch. However, his interior presence wasn't completely bulletproof. During a 20-minute stint on Mar 23 vs IND, he grabbed seven rebounds and dished four assists but still suffered a -3.5 impact score. He struggled to secure the paint against physical bigs in that matchup, bleeding costly second-chance opportunities that dragged his overall rating into the red despite his decent box score numbers.

Moritz Wagner
Forward-Center Yr 7 36G
-3.2
6.9 pts
3.2 reb
0.8 ast
11.8 min

Moritz Wagner spent this twenty-game stretch weaponizing his energy, turning short rotation stints into high-impact wrecking ball sessions. He thrives on pure, unadulterated chaos. When his offensive touch aligns with that motor, he is downright lethal. He completely dismantled a contender on 02/09 vs MIL, logging an elite +13.4 impact driven by an explosive scoring surge and relentless interior finishing. Even when his shot volume vanishes, he finds ways to tilt the floor. He managed a positive +0.7 impact on 01/28 vs MIA despite scoring just 3 points because he brought essential spacing as a trail big and kept his feet moving defensively. Living on the edge of chaos carries hidden costs, though. Quicker guards ruthlessly targeted him in space on 01/30 vs TOR, bleeding points in drop coverage to saddle him with a rapid -3.1 impact in just three minutes.

Jevon Carter
Guard Yr 7 30G (1S)
-3.4
7.2 pts
2.1 reb
2.3 ast
20.4 min

This mid-season stretch was defined by a maddening Jekyll-and-Hyde offensive identity where trigger-happy shot selection frequently sabotaged Carter's defensive hustle. Look at the 02/21 vs PHX game as a prime example of his flaws. He scored 15 points in 33 minutes, but his -1.8 impact score reflected the hidden cost of jacking up 11 three-point attempts with highly erratic results. Things hit rock bottom during the 03/08 vs MIL matchup, where he posted a brutal -8.8 impact score because his habit of settling for contested, early-clock jumpers completely derailed the team's rhythm. He did find brief moments of two-way harmony, like on 02/19 vs SAC. In that contest, an unexpected scoring surge of 14 points on an efficient 5-of-8 from the floor provided a crucial spark, yielding a massive +6.0 impact score. Unfortunately, those efficient flashes were rare anomalies in a block of games where his penchant for excessive chucking routinely bogged down the second unit.

Jamal Cain
Forward Yr 3 40G (1S)
-3.8
5.4 pts
1.9 reb
0.7 ast
12.2 min

Jamal Cain’s late-season stretch was defined by a wildly erratic pendulum swing between game-wrecking hustle and total offensive invisibility. When fully engaged, he was a two-way terror. Despite scoring a modest 12 points on Mar 31 vs PHX, he generated an astronomical +24.4 overall impact score by pairing flawless shot selection with suffocating perimeter pressure that yielded a +16.3 defensive rating. Yet, that discipline routinely vanished, dragging down his value even when the ball went through the hoop. During Mar 21 vs LAL, Cain tallied 10 points but posted a -2.7 impact because he stubbornly settled for contested midrange jumpers early in the shot clock. His floor completely fell out on Mar 29 vs TOR, where a disastrously out-of-sync offensive performance resulted in zero points and a brutal -18.2 impact score in just eight minutes of action. Until he stops letting extreme passivity and tunnel vision sabotage his elite finishing ability, coaches will struggle to trust him on a nightly basis.

Jett Howard
Guard Yr 2 55G
-5.0
5.5 pts
1.6 reb
0.8 ast
12.6 min

Jett Howard spent this stretch oscillating wildly between an instant-offense sparkplug and an actively detrimental shot-chucker. When his stroke was pure, he looked untouchable. He captured that ceiling on 02/19 vs SAC, drilling all six of his field goals for 16 points to earn a massive +8.4 impact score through flawless shooting mechanics. Yet, that pristine marksmanship frequently vanished, leaving behind a player who hijacked possessions by forcing heavily contested looks. Look no further than the 01/09 vs PHI disaster, where he bricked all six of his attempts to post a catastrophic -10.3 impact score in just nine minutes. Even when he managed to score 9 points on 03/07 vs MIN, poor mid-range shot selection dragged his rating down to a -4.3. He did occasionally find ways to generate value without scoring, such as his quiet 4-point outing on 02/26 vs HOU where 6 rebounds and mistake-free defensive positioning yielded a +2.0 impact. Until Howard stops forcing terrible looks when his jumper abandons him, trusting him with rotation minutes will remain a terrifying gamble.

Jase Richardson
Guard Yr 0 54G
-5.4
4.4 pts
1.2 reb
1.1 ast
10.9 min

This brutal twenty-game stretch was defined by erratic swings between fleeting offensive flashes and catastrophic defensive lapses that rendered Richardson a massive liability. He actually found a scoring rhythm on 01/04 vs IND with 12 points and 4 assists, yet still posted a miserable -6.6 impact score because opposing ball-handlers completely shredded his defensive coverages. He briefly flipped the script two nights later on 01/06 vs WAS. Riding an unexpected explosion of perimeter shot-making, he poured in 20 points and generated a +3.0 impact rating. Sadly, that momentum quickly evaporated into a string of unplayable performances, bottoming out on 01/22 vs CHA. During that contest, poor shot selection and a total lack of playmaking severely handicapped the offense, dragging him down to a disastrous -12.2 impact score with just 2 points in 23 minutes. Even when his on-ball defensive effort stabilized later in the winter, his utter inability to generate gravity or hit open looks kept his overall value firmly in the red.

Jonathan Isaac
Forward Yr 8 52G
-6.0
2.6 pts
2.5 reb
0.4 ast
10.0 min

Jonathan Isaac’s midseason stretch was defined by a bizarre tightrope act where his terrifying defensive intimidation constantly battled his total offensive invisibility. When he fully engaged on the less glamorous end of the floor, his disruption drove massive value without him needing to hunt shots. During a highly condensed ten-minute stint on 12/27 vs DEN, he scored just five points but posted a staggering +17.9 impact score by utterly terrorizing the opposition with a defensive masterclass. Yet, his complete lack of scoring gravity often crippled the second unit. On 01/30 vs TOR, defenders freely sagged off him to double-team primary ball-handlers, resulting in a brutal -9.0 impact score even though he chipped in four points and four rebounds. He found a fleeting two-way balance on 01/06 vs WAS, leveraging elite rim protection and hyper-efficient finishing to post a +12.4 impact score in just 12 minutes. Ultimately, when Isaac actively protected the paint, he was a game-wrecking force, but when he settled into the background, he functioned as a zero-gravity liability who actively hindered his own teammates.

Noah Penda
Guard-Forward Yr 0 59G (2S)
-6.2
3.8 pts
3.2 reb
1.2 ast
12.8 min

Noah Penda’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between brilliant bursts of energy and completely unplayable stints. Against CHA on 01/22, he looked like a legitimate rotation weapon. He posted a staggering +9.1 impact score on the back of flawless offensive execution and a highly efficient 13 points. Yet, when given a starting nod and 38 minutes against NOP on 01/11, his overall value plummeted to a brutal -9.1 impact rating. Even though he scored nine points in that contest, poor shot quality and careless offensive fouls actively dragged down his team. Conversely, Penda found ways to salvage his minutes even when his jumper completely abandoned him. During a scoreless six-minute run against PHX on 02/21, he still scratched out a +1.7 impact by relying entirely on high-energy hustle plays to keep possessions alive. To survive in this league, he must realize his worth lies in relentless grit rather than forced half-court creation.

Colin Castleton
Center Yr 2 4G
-7.3
1.2 pts
2.0 reb
0.2 ast
5.3 min
Orlando Robinson
Center Yr 3 4G (1S)
-7.6
1.8 pts
1.0 reb
0.8 ast
6.2 min
Tyus Jones
Guard Yr 10 48G (8S)
-7.7
3.0 pts
1.1 reb
2.4 ast
15.7 min

Complete offensive passivity and glaring defensive liabilities defined a brutal midseason stretch for Tyus Jones. Even when he racked up nine assists off the bench on 01/28 vs MIA, his distinct lack of size created issues on the other end of the floor, dragging his overall impact down to a -4.2. The bottom completely fell out on 03/06 vs NYK. He posted an abysmal -10.1 impact score that night because his uncharacteristic inability to organize the offense resulted in stagnant, late-clock possessions. He briefly flipped the script during a spot start on 02/20 vs MIN. Masterful orchestration and an aggressive 6-for-10 shooting night yielded 13 points and a positive +0.8 impact score. Unfortunately, that spark was a total anomaly. For the vast majority of these matchups, opposing defenders simply sagged off his non-existent scoring threat to clog passing lanes, rendering him a massive on-court liability.

Alex Morales
Guard Yr 0 4G
-10.2
2.0 pts
0.8 reb
1.0 ast
5.9 min

GAME LOG

L
ORL ORL 108
113 BOS BOS
Apr 12 Analysis available
-5
W
ORL ORL 127
103 CHI CHI
Apr 10 Analysis available
+24
W
MIN MIN 120
132 ORL ORL
Apr 8 Analysis available
+12
W
DET DET 107
123 ORL ORL
Apr 6 Analysis available
+16
W
ORL ORL 112
108 NOP NOP
Apr 5 Analysis available
+4
W
ORL ORL 138
127 DAL DAL
Apr 3 Analysis available
+11
L
ATL ATL 130
101 ORL ORL
Apr 1 Analysis available
-29
W
PHX PHX 111
115 ORL ORL
Mar 31 Analysis available
+4
L
ORL ORL 87
139 TOR TOR
Mar 29 Analysis available
-52
W
SAC SAC 117
121 ORL ORL
Mar 26 Analysis available
+4
L
ORL ORL 131
136 CLE CLE
Mar 24 Analysis available
-5
L
IND IND 128
126 ORL ORL
Mar 23 Analysis available
-2
L
LAL LAL 105
104 ORL ORL
Mar 21 Analysis available
-1
L
ORL ORL 111
130 CHA CHA
Mar 19 Analysis available
-19
L
OKC OKC 113
108 ORL ORL
Mar 17 Analysis available
-5
L
ORL ORL 112
124 ATL ATL
Mar 16 Analysis available
-12
W
ORL ORL 121
117 MIA MIA
Mar 14 Analysis available
+4
W
WAS WAS 131
136 ORL ORL
Mar 12 Analysis available
+5
W
CLE CLE 122
128 ORL ORL
Mar 11 Analysis available
+6
W
ORL ORL 130
91 MIL MIL
Mar 8 Analysis available
+39
W
ORL ORL 119
92 MIN MIN
Mar 7 Analysis available
+27
W
DAL DAL 114
115 ORL ORL
Mar 5 Analysis available
+1
W
WAS WAS 109
126 ORL ORL
Mar 3 Analysis available
+17
L
DET DET 106
92 ORL ORL
Mar 1 Analysis available
-14
L
HOU HOU 113
108 ORL ORL
Feb 26 Analysis available
-5
W
ORL ORL 110
109 LAL LAL
Feb 24 Analysis available
+1
W
ORL ORL 111
109 LAC LAC
Feb 22 Analysis available
+2
L
ORL ORL 110
113 PHX PHX
Feb 21 Analysis available
-3
W
ORL ORL 131
94 SAC SAC
Feb 19 Analysis available
+37
L
MIL MIL 116
108 ORL ORL
Feb 11 Analysis available
-8
W
MIL MIL 99
118 ORL ORL
Feb 9 Analysis available
+19
W
UTA UTA 117
120 ORL ORL
Feb 7 Analysis available
+3
W
BKN BKN 98
118 ORL ORL
Feb 5 Analysis available
+20
L
ORL ORL 92
128 OKC OKC
Feb 3 Analysis available
-36
L
ORL ORL 103
112 SAS SAS
Feb 1 Analysis available
-9
W
TOR TOR 120
130 ORL ORL
Jan 30 Analysis available
+10
W
ORL ORL 133
124 MIA MIA
Jan 28 Analysis available
+9
L
ORL ORL 98
114 CLE CLE
Jan 27 Analysis available
-16
L
CLE CLE 119
105 ORL ORL
Jan 25 Analysis available
-14
L
CHA CHA 124
97 ORL ORL
Jan 23 Analysis available
-27
L
ORL ORL 109
126 MEM MEM
Jan 18 Analysis available
-17
W
MEM MEM 111
118 ORL ORL
Jan 15 Analysis available
+7
W
NOP NOP 118
128 ORL ORL
Jan 11 Analysis available
+10
L
PHI PHI 103
91 ORL ORL
Jan 10 Analysis available
-12
W
ORL ORL 104
103 BKN BKN
Jan 8 Analysis available
+1
L
ORL ORL 112
120 WAS WAS
Jan 7 Analysis available
-8
W
IND IND 127
135 ORL ORL
Jan 4 Analysis available
+8
L
ORL ORL 114
121 CHI CHI
Jan 3 Analysis available
-7
W
ORL ORL 112
110 IND IND
Dec 31 Analysis available
+2
L
ORL ORL 106
107 TOR TOR
Dec 30 Analysis available
-1
W
DEN DEN 126
127 ORL ORL
Dec 28 Analysis available
+1
L
CHA CHA 120
105 ORL ORL
Dec 27 Analysis available
-15
W
ORL ORL 110
106 POR POR
Dec 24 Analysis available
+4
L
ORL ORL 97
120 GSW GSW
Dec 23 Analysis available
-23
W
ORL ORL 128
127 UTA UTA
Dec 21 Analysis available
+1
L
ORL ORL 115
126 DEN DEN
Dec 19 Analysis available
-11
L
NYK NYK 132
120 ORL ORL
Dec 13 Analysis available
-12
W
MIA MIA 108
117 ORL ORL
Dec 9 Analysis available
+9
L
ORL ORL 100
106 NYK NYK
Dec 7 Analysis available
-6
W
MIA MIA 105
106 ORL ORL
Dec 6 Analysis available
+1
L
SAS SAS 114
112 ORL ORL
Dec 4 Analysis available
-2
W
CHI CHI 120
125 ORL ORL
Dec 2 Analysis available
+5
W
ORL ORL 112
109 DET DET
Nov 29 Analysis available
+3
W
ORL ORL 144
103 PHI PHI
Nov 26 Analysis available
+41
L
ORL ORL 129
138 BOS BOS
Nov 23 Analysis available
-9
W
NYK NYK 121
133 ORL ORL
Nov 22 Analysis available
+12
W
LAC LAC 101
129 ORL ORL
Nov 21 Analysis available
+28
W
GSW GSW 113
121 ORL ORL
Nov 19 Analysis available
+8
L
ORL ORL 113
117 HOU HOU
Nov 17 Analysis available
-4
W
BKN BKN 98
105 ORL ORL
Nov 15 Analysis available
+7
W
ORL ORL 124
107 NYK NYK
Nov 13 Analysis available
+17
W
POR POR 112
115 ORL ORL
Nov 11 Analysis available
+3
L
BOS BOS 111
107 ORL ORL
Nov 9 Analysis available
-4
W
BOS BOS 110
123 ORL ORL
Nov 8 Analysis available
+13
L
ORL ORL 112
127 ATL ATL
Nov 5 Analysis available
-15
W
ORL ORL 125
94 WAS WAS
Nov 1 Analysis available
+31
W
ORL ORL 123
107 CHA CHA
Oct 30 Analysis available
+16
L
ORL ORL 116
135 DET DET
Oct 29 Analysis available
-19
L
ORL ORL 124
136 PHI PHI
Oct 27 Analysis available
-12
L
CHI CHI 110
98 ORL ORL
Oct 25 Analysis available
-12
L
ATL ATL 111
107 ORL ORL
Oct 24 Analysis available
-4
W
MIA MIA 121
125 ORL ORL
Oct 22 Analysis available
+4