MIA

2025-26 Season

SIMONE FONTECCHIO

Miami Heat | Forward | 6-7
Simone Fontecchio
8.4PPG
3.0RPG
1.4APG
16.6MPG
-3.7 Impact

Fontecchio produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.7
Scoring +7.4
Points Scored 8.4 PPG = +8.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.1
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 1.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -1.5
Turnovers 0.7/g (live + dead blend) = -1.5
Defense -0.2
Steals 0.5/g = +1.1
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.4
Hustle & Effort +2.4
Rebounds 3.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.2
Contested Shots 2.0/g = +0.4
Deflections 0.9/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +8.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.3
Net Impact
-3.7
26th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 52th
9.2 PPG
Efficiency 35th
54.5% TS
Playmaking 49th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 30th
3.3 RPG
Defense 49th
+7.1/g
Hustle 32th
+10.2/g
Creation 20th
+1.56/g
Shot Making 60th
+6.63/g
TO Discipline 64th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Simone Fontecchio’s early season was defined by a brief hot streak that rapidly deteriorated into a frustrating, volume-heavy shooting slump. He initially thrived as a bench spark plug, logging a +6.2 Impact score on 10/26 vs NYK by drilling three triples and playing efficiently within the flow of the offense. The wheels quickly fell off as his jumper abandoned him, leading to disastrous outings where poor shot selection actively punished his team. Look no further than 11/22 vs CHI, where he bricked nine of his ten three-point attempts to post a dismal -9.4 Impact. Even when he managed decent scoring totals, hidden costs dragged him down. During his 13-point outing on 11/13 vs CLE, he still recorded a -2.5 Impact because his complete lack of playmaking—registering zero assists—rendered his offensive contribution hollow. He finally snapped out of the malaise on 12/07 vs SAC, generating a massive +8.9 Impact by pairing 20 points with seven rebounds to actively crash the glass rather than just hunting his shot.

Simone Fontecchio’s midseason stretch was defined by a swift demotion to the bench and a frustratingly volatile jump shot. Even when he managed to reach double figures early on, as he did on 12/20 vs BOS with 12 points, his inefficient 4-for-13 chucking actively stalled the offense and resulted in a -5.2 Impact. He eventually found his rhythm as a reserve during a sudden late-January surge. His peak arrived on 01/28 vs ORL, where he poured in 23 points on a blistering 6-of-9 from beyond the arc. That elite perimeter shot-making warped the defense and created massive spacing, earning him a stellar +11.8 Impact. Yet the momentum evaporated the very next night on 01/29 vs CHI. Fontecchio went scoreless on four attempts, registering a catastrophic -20.9 Impact because his defensive limitations and empty offensive trips left his unit completely exposed when the jumpers stopped falling.

Simone Fontecchio’s late-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between lethal floor-spacer and unplayable liability. When his jumper abandoned him, the results were catastrophic. On 02/28 vs HOU, he dragged the second unit into the mud with a brutal -15.7 Impact score, bricking all five of his shot attempts and wasting crucial offensive possessions. Yet he occasionally salvaged his utility without needing a scoring barrage. During the 02/08 vs WAS matchup, Fontecchio posted a stellar +10.5 Impact score despite recording just 12 points. He generated that hidden value through active rebounding and timely defensive rotations to keep the bench unit afloat. When his outside stroke finally caught fire, however, he became a genuine game-wrecker. He absolutely torched the nets on 04/10 vs WAS for 24 points on 8-for-10 shooting, earning a massive +17.8 Impact score purely through elite, highly efficient shotmaking.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Fontecchio has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 47% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Fontecchio doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -5.3, second-half: -2.2. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 15 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. da Silva 56.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 16
J. Clarkson 38.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 9
S. Hauser 37.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Monk 33.8 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.24
PTS 8
L. Shamet 32.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
A. Dosunmu 32.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Durant 30.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
O. Agbaji 26.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Dončić 23.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5
B. Sensabaugh 22.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. da Silva 54.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
J. Clarkson 46.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
S. Hauser 40.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Okoro 27.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 7
A. Dosunmu 26.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 8
A. Bailey 25.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
N. Clifford 25.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
O. Agbaji 24.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Shamet 23.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 9
J. Phillips 22.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

71
Games
8.4
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
41.1
FG%
37.4
3P%
84.3
FT%
16.6
MPG

GAME LOG

71 games played